Analysis and Evaluation of EHR Approaches

Summary

Objectives: EHR systems are core applications in any eHealth/pHealth environment and represent basic services for health telematics platforms. Standards Developing Organizations as well as national programs define EHR architectures as well as related design, implementation, and deployment processes. Claiming to meet the challenge for semantic interoperability and to offer a sustainable pathway, the resulting documents and specifications are sometimes controversial and even inconsistent.

Methods: Based on long-term experiences from national and international EHR projects, inputs from related academic groups, and active involvement at CEN, ISO, HL7, an analysis and evaluation study has been performed. Using the Generic Component Model (GCM) reference architecture, the characteristics for advanced and sustainable EHR architectures have been investigated. The dimensions of such an architectural reference model have been described, including basic principles of the underlying formal logical framework.

Results: Strengths and weaknesses of the different standards, specifications, and approaches have been studied and summarized. Migration pathways for re-using and harmonizing the available materials as well as for formally defining standards development roadmaps can be derived.

Conclusions: For providing interoperable and sustainable EHR systems, an EHR architecture reflecting all paradigms of the GCM is absolutely necessary. The resulting EHR solution represents a services architecture of distributed components. The development process shall be completely model-driven and tool-based with formalized specifications of all domains’ aspects.

Keywords

EHR - architecture - models - semantic interoperability - standards

• References

• 1 Blobel B. Introduction into Advanced eHealth – The Personal Health Challenge. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M. editors. eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge – The Global Experts Summit Textbook. Series “Studies in Health Technology and Informatics”, Vol. 134. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. pp 3-14.
• 2 Blobel B, Pharow P, Norgall T. How to Enhance Integrated Care towards the Personal Health Paradigm?. In: Kuhn KA, Warren JR, Leong T-Z. (eds.). MEDINFO 2007. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2007. pp 172-176.
• 3 ISO DTR 20514 “Health informatics – Electronic Health Record – Definition, Scope and Context”.
• 4 ISO TS 18308 “Health informatics – Requirements for an Electronic Health Record Architecture”
• 5 IEEE 1471-20000 Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems.
• 6 Blobel B. Advanced EHR Architectures – Promises or Reality. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 95-101.
• 7 Object Management Group, Inc.. http://www.omg. org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 8 Blobel B. Educational Challenge of Health Information Systems’ Interoperability. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46: 52-56.
• 9 Blobel B. Assessment of Middleware Concepts Using a Generic Component Model. Proceedings of the Conference “Toward An Electronic Health Record Europe ’97”, London: 1997. pp 221-228.
• 10 Blobel B. Application of the Component Paradigm for Analysis and Design of Advanced Health System Architectures. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2000; 60 (03) 281-301.
• 11 Blobel B. Analysis, Design and Implementation of Secure and Interoperable Distributed Health Information Systems. Series “Studies in Health Technology and Informatics” Vol. 89. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002
• 12 ISO 7498 OSI Open Systems Interconnection – Reference Model, also published as ITU-T X.200.
• 13 Siegel J. Quick CORBA 3. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001
• 14 Smith B, Brochhausen M. Establishing and Harmonizing Ontologies in an Interdisciplinary Health Care and Clinical Research Environment. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M. editors. eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge – The Global Experts Summit Textbook. Series “Studies in Health Technology and Informatics”, Vol. 134. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. pp 3-14.
• 15 ISO 10746 “Information Technology – Open Distributed Processing”.
• 16 Lopez DM, Blobel B. A development framework for semantically interoperable health information systems. Int J Med Inf 2009; 78, 2: 83-103.
• 17 Eclipse Foundation, Inc. http://www.eclipse.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 18 Blobel B. Concept Representation in Health Informatics for Enabling Intelligent Architectures. In: Hasman A, Haux R, van der Lei J, De Clercq E, Roger-France F. editors. Ubiquity: Technology for Better Health in Aging Societies. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 124. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006. pp 285-291.
• 19 García-Matos M, Väänänen J. Abstract Model Theory as a Framework for Universal Logic. In: Beziau J-Y. editor. Logica Universalis, 2nd Edition. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag AG; 2007. pp 19-33.
• 20 Weidenbach C. First-Order Tableaux with Sorts. J of the IGPL 1995; 3 (06) 887-906.
• 21 Bloe R, Kamareddine F, Nederpelt R. The Barendregt Cube with Definitions and Generalized Reduction.
• 22 Kamareddine F, Laan T, Nederpelt R. A Modern Perspective on Type Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004
• 23 Blobel B, Pharow P. Formal Policies for Flexible EHR Security. In: Bos L, Roa L, Yogesan K, O’Connell B, Marsh A, Blobel B. editors. Medical and Care Compunetics 3. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 121. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006
• 24 Health Level Seven Inc.. http://www.hl7.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 25 EN/ISO 13606 “Health Informatics – EHR Communications”.
• 26 Australian Ministry for Health and Aging: The GEHR Project: http://www.health.gov.au (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 27 openEHR Foundation. http://www.openehr.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 28 American Society for Testing and Materials. http://www.astm.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 29 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise:. www.ihe.net , see also www.rsna.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 30 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. http://www.nema.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 31 DIN INS Project.. Internal Working Document on EHR Requirements. eHCC / DIN; Germany:
• 32 EN/ISO 12967 “Health Informatics – Service Architecture”.
• 33 EHR-S Blueprint http://www.infoway-inforoute. ca (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 34 NHS National Programme for Information Technology (IT). http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs. uk (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 35 Bernstein K, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Vingtoft S, Andersen SK, Nøhr C. Modelling and Implementing Electronic Health Records in Denmark. Int J Med Inf 2005; 74 2–4 213-220.
• 36 The Eurorec Institute. http://www.eurorec.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 37 Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology. http://www.cchit.org (last accessed December 20, 2008)
• 38 German Federal Republic, Federal Ministry for Health and Social Affairs.. http://www.bmg.bund.de (last accessed December 20, 2008)