Endoscopic biodegradable stents as a rescue treatment in the management of post bariatric surgery leaks: a case series

Abstract

Background and aims Postoperative leak is one of the most feared complications after bariatric surgery. Endoscopic stenting is used to manage leaks by decreasing the gastrointestinal intraluminal pressure. The main advantage of endoscopic management is providing healing while still allowing for oral nutrition. However, limited literature exists on whether biodegradable stents can be used to control leaks when conventional metallic stents fail.

Methods Our series consists of four patients who were found to have a leak as a complication of bariatric surgery. Two patients were initially managed by abdominal/chest drainage, and one required total parenteral nutrition. Conventional endoscopic exclusion techniques with short and long fully covered metallic stents were tried and failed in three of the four patients included in this series. Thus, biodegradable stents were used as a rescue option.

Results Biodegradable stents provided immediate improvement for all of the patients, and Gastrografin studies were leak-free 2 days after the procedure. All patients were started on oral feeding and discharged home within 5 – 6 days later. Minimum outpatient follow-up of 8 weeks was achieved with no issues. Follow-up endoscopy was performed 2 – 3 months later in three patients and showed completely resorbed stents. The only drawback was the mucosal reaction to the stent causing dysphagia in two patients, who eventually needed esophageal dilatation.

Conclusion Biodegradable stents have the potential to provide a reasonable rescue option to manage post bariatric surgery leaks in patients who fail conventional endoscopic exclusion methods. However, data from larger studies are needed to collect information on which theoretical advantages/disadvantages of degradable biomaterials apply to real practice.

• References

• 1 Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E. et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 292: 1724-1737 [Review. Erratum in: JAMA 2005; 293: 1728]
• 2 Lalor PF, Tucker ON, Szomstein S. et al. Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4: 33-38
• 3 Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A. et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 240-245
• 4 Abou Rached A, Basile M, El Masri H. Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: Review of its prevention and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 13904-13910
• 5 Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM. et al. Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 935-938 ; discussion 938–939
• 6 Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno-de-Vega V, Marín I. et al. Biodegradable stents in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 2212-2217
• 7 Csendes A, Braghetto I, León P. et al. Management of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1343-1348
• 8 Mattesini A, Secco GG, Dall’Ara G. et al. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 741-750
• 9 Han Y, Jing Q, Li Y. et al. Multi-Center Registry of EXCEL BiodegrAdable Polymer Drug EluTing Stents (CREATE) investigators. Sustained clinical safety and efficacy of a biodegradable-polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in “real-world” practice: three-year outcomes of the CREATE (Multi-Center Registry of EXCEL Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stents) study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 79: 211-216
• 10 Repici A, Vleggaar FP, Hassan C. et al. Efficacy and safety of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures: the BEST (Biodegradable Esophageal Stent) study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 927-934
• 11 Praveenraj P, Gomes RM, Kumar S. et al. Management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a tertiary care experience and design of a management algorithm. J Minim Access Surg 2016; 12: 342-349