Peroral endoscopic myotomy is effective and safe in non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders: an international multicenter study

Abstract

Background and study aims The efficacy of per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders such as esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE) has not been well demonstrated. The aim of this international multicenter study was to assess clinical outcomes of POEM in patients with non-achalasia disorders, namely DES, JE, and EGJOO, in a large cohort of patients.

Patients and methods This was a retrospective study at 11 centers. Consecutive patients who underwent POEM for EGJOO, DES, or JE between 1/2014 and 9/2016 were included. Rates of technical success (completion of myotomy), clinical response (symptom improvement/Eckardt score ≤ 3), and adverse events (AEs, severity per ASGE lexicon) were ascertained.

Results Fifty patients (56 % female; mean age 61.7 years) underwent POEM for EGJOO (n = 15), DES (n = 17), and JE (n = 18). The majority of patients (68 %) were treatment-naïve. Technical success was achieved in all patients with a mean procedural time of 88.4 ± 44.7 min. Mean total myotomy length was 15.1 ± 4.7 cm. Chest pain improved in 88.9 % of EGJOO and 87.0 % of DES/JE (P = 0.88). Clinical success was achieved in 93.3 % of EGJOO and in 84.9 % of DES/JE (P = 0.41) with a median follow-up of 195 and 272 days, respectively. Mean Eckardt score decreased from 6.2 to 1.0 in EGJOO (P < 0.001) and from 6.9 to 1.9 in DES/JE (P < 0.001). A total of 9 (18 %) AEs occurred and were rated as mild in 55.6 % and moderate in 44.4 %.

Conclusion POEM is effective and safe in management of non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders, which include DES, JE, and EGJOO.

• References

• 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 2 Khashab MA, El Zein M, Kumbhari V. et al. Comprehensive analysis of efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed by a gastroenterologist in the endoscopy unit: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 117-125
• 3 Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Kalloo AN. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a 4-step approach to a challenging procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 997-998
• 4 Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. Peroral endoscopic myotomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 496-509
• 5 Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Chiu PW. et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 927-933.e2
• 6 Bechara R, Onimaru M, Ikeda H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy, 1000 cases later: pearls, pitfalls, and practical considerations. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 330-338
• 7 Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanstrom LL. et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Gut 2016; 65: 899-906
• 8 Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD. et al. Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 967-978
• 9 Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Onimaru M. et al. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1170-1177
• 10 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D. et al. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3322-3338
• 11 Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J. et al. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 37-45
• 12 Drenth JP, Bos LP, Engels LG. Efficacy of diltiazem in the treatment of diffuse oesophageal spasm. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1990; 4: 411-416
• 13 Vanuytsel T, Bisschops R, Farre R. et al. Botulinum toxin reduces Dysphagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1115-1121 e1112
• 14 Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Jackhammer esophagus: to cut or not to cut the lower esophageal sphincter. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E585-E588
• 15 Haito-Chavez Y, Inoue H, Beard KW. et al. Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy in 1826 patients: an international multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 1267-1276
• 16 Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Onimaru M. et al. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1170-1177
• 17 Perbtani YB, Mramba LK, Yang D. et al. Life after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: long-term outcomes of quality of life and their association with Eckardt scores. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 6: 1415-1420.e1
• 18 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 19 Committee NPWP, Stavropoulos SN, Desilets DJ. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 1-15
• 20 Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE. et al. Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three yearsʼ experience with 1161 patients. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 593-597
• 21 Mujica VR, Mudipalli RS, Rao SS. Pathophysiology of chest pain in patients with nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1371-1377
• 22 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motility 2015; 27: 160-174
• 23 Roman S, Gyawali CP, Xiao Y. et al. The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2014; 24: 545-561