CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(02): E302-E307
DOI: 10.1055/a-0684-9563
Case report
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Endoscopic banding without resection (BWR) technique for treatment of diminutive neuroendocrine tumors in the duodenum

Harshit S. Khara
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, USA
,
Gerald J. Shovlin
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, USA
,
Amitpal S. Johal
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, USA
,
David L. Diehl
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 08 December 2016

accepted after revision 17 April 2018

Publication Date:
08 February 2019 (online)

Abstract

Endoscopic treatment of diminutive (less than 10 mm) duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended because of the risk of metastatic potential. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are alternatives to surgical management but have significant adverse event rates. We evaluated the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of the ‘banding without resection’ (BWR) technique and assessed outcomes for the treatment of diminutive duodenal NETs. Our study included eight patients referred for endoscopic treatment of incidentally discovered, biopsy proven, diminutive duodenal bulb NETs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in all patients showed duodenal bulb NETs located in the deep mucosa and submucosal layers without any nodal metastasis. The BWR technique was successfully performed in all patients with technical feasibility, with the assistance of submucosal saline lift in three patients when the lesion was smaller than 5 mm in size, without any immediate or delayed adverse events. Complete resection with no residual lesion was confirmed at short-term (median 2.3 months) and long-term (median 4.2 years) follow-up intervals by repeat endoscopy, biopsy, and EUS exam. The BWR technique appears to be a safe, feasible, and effective therapy for endoscopic treatment of diminutive duodenal bulb NETs in the absence of local and distant metastasis.

 
  • References

  • 1 Burke AP, Sobin LH, Federspiel BH. et al. Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum. A clinicopathologic study of 99 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114: 700-704
  • 2 Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95: 74-87
  • 3 Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB. et al. Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 390-396
  • 4 Min BH, Kim ER, Lee JH. et al. Management strategy for small duodenal carcinoid tumors: does conservative management with close follow-up represent an alternative to endoscopic treatment?. Digestion 2013; 87: 247-253
  • 5 Gincul R, Ponchon T, Napoleon B. et al. Endoscopic treatment of sporadic small duodenal and ampullary neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 979-986
  • 6 Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Yoshida Y. et al. Duodenal carcinoid tumors: 5 cases treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1152-1156
  • 7 Diaz-Cervantes E, De-la-Torre-Bravo A, Spechler SJ. et al. Banding without resection (endoscopic mucosal ligation) as a novel approach for the ablation of short-segment Barrett’s epithelium: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1640-1645
  • 8 Sun S, Ge N, Wang C. et al. Endoscopic band ligation of small gastric stromal tumors and follow-up by endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 574-578
  • 9 Sun S, Ge N, Wang S. et al. EUS-assisted band ligation of small duodenal stromal tumors and follow-up by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 492-496
  • 10 Lee SH, Hong YS, Lee JM. et al. Duodenal gastrinoma treated with endoscopic band ligation. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 964-967
  • 11 Sun S, Jin Y, Chang G. et al. Endoscopic band ligation without electrosurgery: a new technique for excision of small upper-GI leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 218-222
  • 12 Ibáñez-Sanz G, Gornals JB, Rivas L. et al. Endoscopic band ligation without resection in selected patients for small and superficial upper gastrointestinal tract lesions. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2016; 108: 250-256
  • 13 Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT. et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman TF, Carneiro F, Hruban RH. et al., eds. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edn. Lyon: International Agency for Research on cancer (IARC); 2010: 13
  • 14 Gress DM, Edge SB, Gershenwald JE. et al. Principles of cancer staging. In: Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL. et al., eds. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York: Springer; 2017: 3-30
  • 15 Soga J. Endocrinocarcinomas (carcinoids and their variants) of the duodenum. An evaluation of 927 cases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2003; 22: 349-363
  • 16 Yoshikane H, Tsukamoto Y, Niwa Y. et al. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 375-383
  • 17 Siyu S, Sheng W, Guoxin W. et al. Gastric perforations after ligation of GI stromal tumors in the gastric fundus. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 615-616