Reliability of Transient Elastography-Based Liver Stiffness for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis with Specific Cut-Off Values

Jinzhen Song; Zida Ma; Jianbo Huang; Yan Luo; Romanas Zykus; Ashish Kumar; Matthew Kitson; Qiang Lu

doi:10.1055/a-0731-0178

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents

Ultraschall Med 2020; 41(01): 60-68
DOI: 10.1055/a-0731-0178

Original Article

Reliability of Transient Elastography-Based Liver Stiffness for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis with Specific Cut-Off Values

Reliabilität der auf transienter Elastografie basierten Lebersteifigkeit in der Diagnose der portalen Hypertension bei Patienten mit alkoholischer Lebererkrankung: Eine diagnostische Meta-Analyse mit bestimmten Cut-off-Werten

Jinzhen Song

¹Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

,

Zida Ma

²West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

,

Jianbo Huang

³Laboratory of Clinical Ultrasound Imaging Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

,

Yan Luo

¹Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

,

Romanas Zykus

⁴Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

,

Ashish Kumar

⁵Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir-Ganga-Ram-Hospital, New Delhi, India

,

Matthew Kitson

⁶Gastroenterology, Alfred-Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

,

Qiang Lu

¹Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Transient elastography-based liver stiffness value (TE-LSV) has been studied for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Liver stiffness is influenced by the disease etiology. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine the performance of TE-LSV for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD).

Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane library. A bivariate model was used to compute sensitivity and specificity. A random effects model was used to pool diagnostic odds ratios.

Results 9 studies with 679 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity based on a cut-off value around 21.8 kPa for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) were 0.89 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.83–0.93) and 0.71(95 % CI, 0.64–0.78), respectively. For severe portal hypertension (SPH), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off value around 29.1 kPa were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.83–0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.67–0.81), respectively.

Conclusion TE-LSV showed good performance for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with ALD. The optimal cut-off value for CSPH and SPH was around 21.8 kPa and 29.1 kPa, respectively, and these two cut-off values showed good sensitivity and modest specificity. The etiology should be clear before using TE-LSV for portal hypertension.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Der diagnostische Wert der Bestimmung der auf transienter Elastografie basierten Lebersteifigkeit (TE-LSV) wurde bei portaler Hypertension untersucht. Die Lebersteifigkeit wird durch die Erkrankungsursache beeinflusst. Unser Ziel war die Durchführung einer Meta-Analyse zur Ermittlung der diagnostischen Aussagekraft der TE-LSV für die Diagnose von portaler Hypertension bei Patienten mit alkoholischer Lebererkrankung (alcoholic liver disease, ALD).

Methoden Wir durchsuchten PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid und die Cochrane-Bibliothek. Ein bivariates Modell wurde für die Berechnung von Sensitivität und Spezifität verwendet. Ein Random-Effects-Modell wurde angewandt, um die diagnostischen Odds-Ratios zu poolen.

Ergebnisse Es wurden 9 Studien mit 679 Patienten eingeschlossen. Für eine klinisch signifikante portale Hypertension (CSPH) basierend auf einem Cut-off-Wert von etwa 21,8 kPa betrugen die gepoolte Sensitivität 0,89 (95 % Konfidenzintervall (CI), 0,83–0,93) und die gepoolte Spezifität 0,71 (95 % CI, 0,64–0,78). Bei schwerer portaler Hypertension (SPH) betrugen die gepoolte Sensitivität 0,88 (95 % CI, 0,83–0,92) und die Spezifität 0,74 (95 % CI, 0,67–0,81) für einen Cut-off-Wert um 29,1 kPa.

Schlussfolgerung TE-LSV zeigte eine gute diagnostische Leistung bezüglich der portalen Hypertension bei Patienten mit ALD. Der optimale Cut-off-Wert für CSPH betrug etwa 21,8 kPa und der für SPH 29,1 kPa; beide Werte zeigten eine gute Sensitivität und mäßige Spezifität. Eine Abklärung der Ätiologie vor Durchführung der TE-LSV bei portaler Hypertonie sollte erfolgen.

Key words

portal hypertension - alcoholic liver disease - elastography - abdomen

Full Text

References

References
1 D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 217-231
2 Jansen C, Bogs C, Verlinden W. et al. Shear-wave elastography of the liver and spleen identifies clinically significant portal hypertension: A prospective multicentre study. Liver Int 2017; 37: 396-405
3 Berzigotti A. Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography. J Hepatol 2017; 67: 399-411
4 Targownik LE, Spiegel BM, Dulai GS. et al. The cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient monitoring in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1306-1315
5 Pavlov CS, Casazza G, Nikolova D. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography for staging of fibrosis in people with alcoholic liver disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2016; 43: 575-585
6 Franchis RD. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension : Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743-752
7 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: e16-e47
8 Thiele M, Madsen BS, Hansen JF. et al. Accuracy of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test vs Fibrotest, Elastography and Indirect Markers in Detection of Advanced Fibrosis in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1369-1379
9 You MW, Kim KW, Pyo J. et al. A Meta-analysis for the Diagnostic Performance of Transient Elastography for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43: 59-68
10 Kim G, Kim MY, Baik SK. Transient elastography versus hepatic venous pressure gradient for diagnosing portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017; 23: 34-41
11 Shi KQ, Fan YC, Pan ZZ. et al. Transient elastography: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in evaluation of portal hypertension in chronic liver disease. Liver Int 2013; 33: 62-71
12 Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME. et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011; 155: 529-536
13 Hametner S, Ferlitsch A, Ferlitsch M. et al. The VITRO Score (Von Willebrand Factor Antigen/Thrombocyte Ratio) as a New Marker for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Comparison to Other Non-Invasive Parameters of Fibrosis Including ELF Test. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0149230
14 Salzl P, Reiberger T, Ferlitsch M. et al. Evaluation of portal hypertension and varices by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the liver compared to transient elastography and AST to platelet ratio index. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35: 528-533
15 Procopet B, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG. et al. Real-time shear-wave elastography: applicability, reliability and accuracy for clinically significant portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 62: 1068-1075
16 Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Arena U. et al. Elastography, spleen size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 102-111.e1
17 Llop E, Berzigotti A, Reig M. et al. Assessment of portal hypertension by transient elastography in patients with compensated cirrhosis and potentially resectable liver tumors. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 103-108
18 Kumar A, Khan NM, Anikhindi SA. et al. Correlation of transient elastography with hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension: A study of 326 patients from India. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 687-696
19 Zykus R, Jonaitis L, Petrenkiene V. et al. Liver and spleen transient elastography predicts portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 183
20 Schwabl P, Bota S, Salzl P. et al. New reliability criteria for transient elastography increase the number of accurate measurements for screening of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Liver Int 2015; 35: 381-390
21 Kitson MT, Roberts SK, Colman JC. et al. Liver stiffness and the prediction of clinically significant portal hypertension and portal hypertensive complications. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 462-469
22 Hong WK, Kim MY, Baik SK. et al. The usefulness of non-invasive liver stiffness measurements in predicting clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients: Korean data. Clin Mol Hepatol 2013; 19: 370-375
23 Reiberger T, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA. et al. Noninvasive screening for liver fibrosis and portal hypertension by transient elastography--a large single center experience. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2012; 124: 395-402
24 Lemoine M, Katsahian S, Ziol M. et al. Liver stiffness measurement as a predictive tool of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus or alcohol-related cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 1102-1110
25 Bureau C, Metivier S, Peron JM. et al. Transient elastography accurately predicts presence of significant portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1261-1268
26 Cho EJ, Kim MY, Lee JH. et al. Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of Noninvasive Predictors of Portal Hypertension in Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0133935
27 Mueller S. Does pressure cause liver cirrhosis? The sinusoidal pressure hypothesis. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 10482-10501
28 Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG. et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 45: 1290-1297
29 Mueller S, Sandrin L. Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease. Hepat Med 2010; 2: 49-67
30 Pinzani M, Rombouts K. Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36: 231-242
31 Song J, Ma Z, Huang J. et al. Comparison of three cut-offs to diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension by liver stiffness in chronic viral liver diseases: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2018; online-publication:
32 Tsochatzis EA, Gurusamy KS, Ntaoula S. et al. Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Hepatology 2011; 54: 650-659
33 Piscaglia F, Salvatore V, Mulazzani L. et al. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 1-5
34 Piscaglia F, Salvatore V, Mulazzani L. et al. Differences in liver stiffness values obtained with new ultrasound elastography machines and Fibroscan: A comparative study. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49: 802-808

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material