Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2019; 127(09): 598-602
DOI: 10.1055/a-0811-9136
Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Selenoprotein P in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Stergios A. Polyzos
1   First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Jannis Kountouras
2   Second Medical Clinic, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Maria Mavrouli
3   Department of Microbiology, National Kapodestrian University, Athens, Greece
,
Panagiotis Katsinelos
2   Second Medical Clinic, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Michael Doulberis
4   Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
,
Elpida Gavana
1   First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Leonidas Duntas
5   Endocrine Unit, Evgenidion Hospital, National Kapodestrian University, Athens, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 17 October 2018
revised 11 November 2018

accepted 03 December 2018

Publication Date:
09 January 2019 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

Objective Main aim of this study was to evaluate circulating selenoprotein P (SEPP) levels in patients with simple steatosis (SS) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) compared with healthy controls.

Methods Thirty-one patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (15 with SS, 10 with borderline NASH, 6 with definite NASH) and 27 matched controls without NAFLD were enrolled. Serum SEPP levels and liver function tests plus biochemical parameters were measured with ELISA and standard methods, respectively. Homeostatic model of assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated.

Results SEPP levels were statistically different between groups (p-value for trend=0.043). In pairwise comparisons, SEPP was lower in definite NASH compared with controls (p=0.029), but not SS (p=0.18) or borderline NASH (p=0.35). SEPP was not different between controls, SS and borderline NASH. The unadjusted trend between the controls, SS and NASH patients remained essentially unchanged after adjustment for age, sex, log(ALT) and waist circumference, but it marginally lost significance when log(HOMA-IR) entered into the model. SEPP levels were not different between groups of different severity of steatosis, fibrosis, hepatocellular ballooning, lobular and portal inflammation.

Conclusions Lower SEPP levels were observed in patients with definite NASH compared with controls, a finding warranting larger studies.