Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-0838-5180
Mid- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for submucosal esophageal cancer types pT1b-SM1 and pT1b-SM2
Publication History
submitted 15 June 2018
accepted after revision 27 December 2018
Publication Date:
17 May 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/201906/lookinside/thumbnails/1284_10-1055-a-0838-5180-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are promising therapeutic options for early esophageal cancer (EC). The factors that can affect mid- and long-term survival in patients with submucosal EC (SM1 and SM2) have not been described in the literature. We aim to describe clinicopathological outcomes and factors that can affect the mid- and long-term survival in patients with resected submucosal tumors.
Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for submucosal tumors over a 20-year period. The final study population included 119 cases with 137 lesions. Information was collected according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 11-edition and factors affecting survival for 2 and 5 years after ER were analyzed.
Results EMR was performed in 99 cases (72.3 %), ESD in 38 cases (27.7 %). There were no significant complications. Two- and 5-year survival rates were 91 % and 82 %, respectively. Mean age was 67.22 years (± 9.49 years), mortality caused by EC occurred in 13 cases (11 %). Factors that had a significant impact on long-term survival were age > 65 years (P = 0.0026), number of resected specimens (P = 0.0031), presence of another progressive disease (not EC) (P ≤ 0.001), recurrence (P = 0.0002), and relation between histopathological positive vertical margin and recurrence (P = 0.0112).
Conclusions ER is viable treatment for esophageal submucosal cancer, selection between ESD/EMR can depend on tumor size and patient condition, and en bloc ER is the recommended technique for submucosal tumors. Long-term survival factors were identified.
-
References
- 1 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: E359-386
- 2 Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A. et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 45: 884-891
- 3 Rizvi QU, Balachandran A, Koay D. et al. Endoscopic Management of Early Esophagogastric Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017; 26: 179-191
- 4 Nishizawa T, Yahagi N. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: technique and new directions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33: 315-319
- 5 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1066-1072
- 6 Kawano T, Kamata K, Fujiwara N. et al. History of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 30: 129-136
- 7 Japan Esophageal S. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus 2017; 14: 1-36
- 8 Committee AT, Maple JT, Abu Dayyeh BK. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1311-1325
- 9 Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Oyama T. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 2015; 12: 1-30
- 10 Japan Esophageal S. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part II and III. Esophagus 2017; 14: 37-65
- 11 Kawano T, Endo M. [Diagnosis and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma]. Nihon Rinsho 1989; 47: 1102-1106
- 12 Kawano T, Miyake S, Yasuno M. et al. A New technique for endoscopic esophageal mucosectomy using a transparent overtube with intraluminal negative pressure (np‐EEM). Digest Endosc 1991; 3: 159-168
- 13 Inoue H, Endo M, Takeshita K. et al. A new simplified technique of endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC). Surg Endosc 1992; 6: 264-265
- 14 Mora A, Nakajima Y, Okada T. et al. Comparative study of predictive mortality scores in esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection in patients with esophageal cancer. Dig Surg 2019; 36: 67-75
- 15 Qi ZP, Chen T, Li B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer in elderly patients with relative indications for endoscopic treatment. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 839-845
- 16 Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Tokairin Y. et al. Prognostic factors for post-recurrence survival in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection. Dig Surg 2016; 33: 136-145
- 17 Kawano T, Nakajima Y, Suzuki T. et al. [Esophageal carcinoma – from the viewpoint of surgery]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2007; 34: 824-830
- 18 Lee HJ, Lee H, Park JC. et al. Treatment strategy after endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution experience. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 714-719
- 19 Ishii N, Uchida S, Itoh T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for superficial esophageal neoplasia. Is it safe for elderly patients?. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2110-2119
- 20 Kawada K, Sugimoto T, Okada R. et al. A case of simultaneous triple primary cancers of the hypopharynx, esophagus, and stomach which were dissected by endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery combined with endoscopic submucosal dissection. In. Open Journal of Gastroenterology 2018; 8: 94-102