Clinical impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders on esophageal muscle layer thickness

Abstract

Background and study aims Previously, we reported that esophageal muscle layer thickness was associated with technical complexity of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). However, there are no data regarding the mid-term effects of POEM procedures on esophageal muscle layer thickness. Therefore, we conducted this study to elucidate mid-term effects of POEM procedures, and to examine whether postoperative changes in esophageal muscle layer thickness were related to particular clinico-pathological features in patients with esophageal motility disorders.

Patients and methods Seventy-four consecutive patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at Kobe University Hospital from April 2015 to December 2016 were prospectively recruited into this study. First, we investigated the esophageal muscle layer thickness values obtained at 1 year after POEM. Second, we evaluated the effects of a reduction in muscle layer thickness on various clinico-pathological features.

Results At 1 year after POEM, mean thickness of the inner circular muscle at 0 cm, 5 cm, and 10 cm from the esophagogastric junction was 1.06 ± 0.45 mm, 0.99 ± 0.36 mm, and 0.97 ± 0.44 mm, respectively. Among all sites, muscle layer thickness had significantly decreased after POEM. However, univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that no clinical factors were associated with esophageal muscle layer thickness after POEM procedure.

Conclusions We demonstrated for the first time that thickness of the esophageal muscle layer was significantly decreased after POEM. This result reveals that changes in esophageal muscle layer thickness caused by esophageal motility disorders are reversible.

• References

• 1 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-174
• 2 Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B. et al. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: e256-261
• 3 Cassella RR, Brown Jr AL, Sayre GP. et al. Achalasia of the esophagus: pathologic and etiologic considerations. Annals Surg 1964; 160: 474-487
• 4 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 5 Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA 2015; 313: 1841-1852
• 6 Yoshizaki T, Toyonaga T, Tanaka S. et al. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions involving the ileocecal valve. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 639-645
• 7 Li SW, Tseng PH, Chen CC. et al. Muscular thickness of lower esophageal sphincter and therapeutic outcomes in achalasia: a prospective study using high-frequency endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 240-248
• 8 Watanabe D, Tanaka S, Ariyoshi R. et al. Muscle layer thickness affects the peroral endoscopic myotomy procedure complexity. diseases of the esophagus Dis Esophagus 2018; 31
• 9 Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 256-264
• 10 Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Kawara F. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy using FlushKnife BT: a single-center series. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E663-E669
• 11 Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology 1992; 103: 1732-1738
• 12 Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet (London, England) 2014; 383: 83-93
• 13 Tung HN, Schulze-Delrieu K, Shirazi S. et al. Hypertrophic smooth muscle in the partially obstructed opossum esophagus. The model: histological and ultrastructural observations. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 853-864
• 14 Gabella G. Hypertrophy of intestinal smooth muscle. Cell Tissue Res 1975; 163: 199-214
• 15 Ferguson TB, Woodbury JD, Roper CL. et al. Giant muscular hypertrophy of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 1969; 8: 209-218
• 16 Friesen DL, Henderson RD, Hanna W. Ultrastructure of the esophageal muscle in achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79: 319-325
• 17 Mittal RK, Kassab G, Puckett JL. et al. Hypertrophy of the muscularis propria of the lower esophageal sphincter and the body of the esophagus in patients with primary motility disorders of the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1705-1712
• 18 Sotoudehmanesh R, Mikaeli J, Daneshpajooh M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with achalasia. Esophagus 2011; 8: 187-190
• 19 Goldblum JR, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. et al. Achalasia. A morphologic study of 42 resected specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18: 327-337
• 20 Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 648-654
• 21 Van Dam J. Endosonographic evaluation of the patient with achalasia. Endoscopy 1998; 30 (Suppl. 01) A48-50
• 22 Van Dam J, Falk GW, Sivak Jr MV. et al. Endosonographic evaluation of the patient with achalasia: appearance of the esophagus using the echoendoscope. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 185-190
• 23 Miller LS, Schiano TD. The use of high frequency endoscopic ultrasonography probes in the evaluation of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995; 5: 635-647