CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(05): E664-E671
DOI: 10.1055/a-0848-8048
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in management of colorectal tumors near or involving a diverticulum: a retrospective case series

Victoria Alejandra Jimenez-Garcia
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Masayoshi Yamada
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hiroaki Ikematsu
2   National Cancer Center Hospital East, Division of Endoscopy and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Kashiwa, Japan
,
Hiroyuki Takamaru
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Seiichiro Abe
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Taku Sakamoto
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takeshi Nakajima
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takahisa Matsuda
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yutaka Saito
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 29 June 2018

accepted after revision 27 December 2018

Publication Date:
03 May 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Surgery is the standard treatment for colon tumors associated with diverticulum. Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat such tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of ESD in treating superficial colorectal tumors situated near or involving diverticulum.

Patients and methods Consecutive patients from two referral centers who had colorectal tumors near or involving diverticulum treated by ESD were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results Of the 12 patients studied, six had tumors near diverticulum and six had tumors involving diverticulum. The overall en-bloc R0 resection rate, median tumor size and procedure time were 67 %, 26.5 mm (range, 15 – 80 mm) and 110 minutes (range, 50 – 220 minutes), respectively. For tumors near diverticulum group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was 100 % and no adverse events (AEs) or residual/recurrent tumors were observed. In contrast, for intradiverticular tumors group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was low at 33 %, and one AE (perforation) was observed. The diverticula were ≥ 6 mm in diameter in the patients with incomplete resection. However, all but one diverticulum was unrecognized before ESD. Two residual tumors were detected at the 12-month surveillance and one required surgery.

Conclusions This case series indicates that ESD is safe and feasible for treating colorectal tumors near a diverticulum and might be feasible for tumors involving a diverticulum smaller than 6 mm. Selection for smaller diverticulum size may contribute to higher en-bloc R0 resection rates.

 
  • References

  • 1 Prescott RJ, Haboubi NY, Dunaway DJ. et al. Carcinoma arising in a diverticulum of sigmoid colon. Histopathology 1992; 21: 387-389
  • 2 Kobayashi N, Hirabayashi K, Matsui T. et al. Depressed-type colon cancer in a patient with diverticulosis. Endoscopy 2008; 40 (Suppl. 02) E44
  • 3 Cohn KH, Weimar JA, Fani K. et al. Adenocarcinoma arising within a colonic diverticulum: report of two cases and review of the literature. Surgery 1993; 113: 223-226
  • 4 Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y. et al. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2700-2706
  • 5 Fu KI, Hamahata Y, Tsujinaka Y. Early colon cancer within a diverticulum treated by magnifying chromoendoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1545-1547
  • 6 Saito Y, Otake Y, Sakamoto T. et al. Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 2013; 7: 263-269
  • 7 Kajiwara H, Umemura S, Mukai M. et al. Adenocarcinoma arising within a colonic diverticulum. Pathol Int 1996; 46: 538-539
  • 8 Ritsuno H, Sakamoto N, Osada T. et al. Large superficial tumor of the colon involving a diverticulum removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 751
  • 9 Kobara H, Mori H, Rafiq K. et al. A peripheral approach allowing successful endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal carcinoma near the diverticula. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2015; 107: 378-379
  • 10 Sakamoto T, Abe S, Nakajima T. et al. Complete removal of a colonic neoplasm extending into a diverticulum with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection-mucosal resection and endoscopic band ligation. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (Suppl. 01) E295-E296
  • 11 Kato M, Uraoka T, Wada M. et al. Laterally spreading tumor involving a colon diverticulum successfully resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 191-192
  • 12 Yoshida N, Naito Y, Kishimoto M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of T1 cancer with colonic diverticulum by pocket-creation method. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 726-727
  • 13 Takasago T, Kuwai T, Yamaguchi T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a scissors-type knife for post-EMR recurrence tumor involving the colon diverticulum. VideoGIE 2017; 2: 211-212
  • 14 Iwatsubo T, Uedo N, Yamasaki Y. et al. Traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by use of clip and line for a neoplasm involving colonic diverticulum. VideoGIE 2017; 2: 337-338
  • 15 Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T. et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8-14
  • 16 Oyama T. Counter traction makes endoscopic submucosal dissection easier. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 375-378
  • 17 Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas D, Arnau MR. et al. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by a new traction method: the clip-band technique. A feasibility study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1137-1141
  • 18 Karita M, Tada M, Okita K. et al. Endoscopic therapy for early colon cancer: the strip biopsy resection technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 128-132
  • 19 Hamilton S, Aaltonen L. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000
  • 20 Tanaka S, Sano Y. Aim to unify the narrow band imaging (NBI) magnifying classification for colorectal tumors: current status in Japan from a summary of the consensus symposium in the 79th Annual Meeting of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. Dig Endosc 2011; 23 (Suppl. 01) 131-139
  • 21 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG. et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625-632
  • 22 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
  • 23 Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 697-707
  • 24 Yamada M, Saito Y, Takamaru H. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 233-242
  • 25 Shigita K, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 546-553
  • 26 Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B. et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 2018; 67: 1280-1289
  • 27 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57-65
  • 28 Yamada M, Saito Y, Sakamoto T. et al. Endoscopic predictors of deep submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 456-464
  • 29 Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al. Treatment strategy for recurrent or residual colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 255-260
  • 30 Mori H, Tsushimi T, Kobara H. et al. Endoscopic management of a rare granulation polyp in a colonic diverticulum. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 9481-9484
  • 31 Carmo J, Marques S, Chapim I. et al. Elastic band ligation for the removal of a colonic tubular adenoma in a diverticulum. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (Suppl. 01) E490-491
  • 32 Pinho R, Oliveira M, Mascarenhas-Saraiva M. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of an inverted colonic diverticulum with intraepithelial neoplasia using the ligate-and-let-go technique. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: A33-A34
  • 33 Shakhatreh MH, Hair C, Shaib YH. et al. Removal of a colonic polyp in a diverticulum: a novel use of the over-the-scope clip device. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 756
  • 34 Valli PV, Kaufmann M, Vrugt B. et al. Endoscopic resection of a diverticulum-arisen colonic adenoma using a full-thickness resection device. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 969-971
  • 35 Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Yamamoto S. et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1024-1030