Subscribe to RSS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f12/60f1207d64e709348d01b6a01c0352d16ea3240a" alt=""
DOI: 10.1055/a-0867-9450
Potential of temperature-response collagen-genipin sols as a novel submucosal injection material for endoscopic resection
Publication History
submitted 01 September 2018
accepted after revision 14 February 2019
Publication Date:
04 April 2019 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d296/3d2963aae50206bf50b3c755d9e3040c391a8749" alt=""
Abstract
Background and study aims We developed a novel submucosal (SM) injection material that contained pepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC), genipin (Ge) and phosphate buffer (PB). The aim of this study was to validate safety and usability of it for endoscopic resection (ER).
Materials and methods In preliminary studies, 1) appropriate warming time and concentration of Ge, and concentration of NaCl in PB, 2) storage modulus of PSC, Ge, and PB mixture (PSC/Ge), and PSC as a mechanical property, 3) histological finding after injection, and histological toxicity of PSC/Ge was evaluated. We injected PSC/Ge, PSC, sodium hyaluronate (SH), dextrose (DW), and normal saline (NS) into SM of resected porcine stomach. We compared mean height of mucosal elevation after immediate injection (MH) and mean retaining rate at 60 minutes (MR) as ex vivo study.
Results Optimal condition of PSC/Ge was Ge 5.5 mMol with 24 hours worming time and NaCl 280 mMol. PSC/Ge had better mechanical property than PSC. It was efficiently integrated and confined to the SM with acceptable toxicity. MH of PSC/Ge (5.1 ± 0.74 mm) and PSC (4.8 ± 0.84 mm) were significantly higher than NS (3.2 ± 0.84 mm). MR of PSC/Ge (100 ± 0.0%) was significantly higher than NS (61.7 ± 11.2%), DW (58.3 ± 11.8%) and SH (61.8 ± 8.6%).
Conclusion PSC/Ge and PSC has potential to be safe and usable for ER. PSC/Ge was better than PSC because of better mechanical property than PSC.
-
References
- 1 Soetikno RM, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 567-579
- 2 Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML. et al. En bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 332-337
- 3 Liu W, Zhao M, Liu W. et al. A feasibility study of a thermally sensitive elastin-like polypeptide for submucosal injection application in endoscopic resection in 3 animal models. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 944-952
- 4 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K. et al. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 579-583
- 5 Hikichi T, Yamasaki M, Watanabe K. et al. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using sodium carboxymethylcellulose as a new injection substance. Fukushima J Med Sci 2016; 62: 43-50
- 6 Pioche M, Lepilliez V, Deprez P. et al. High pressure jet injection of viscous solutions for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): first clinical experience. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E368-372
- 7 Wen W, Shi C, Shi Y. et al. A pilot animal and clinical study of autologous blood solution compared with normal saline for use as an endoscopic submucosal cushion. Exper Therap Med 2012; 4: 419-424
- 8 Akagi T, Yasuda K, Tajima M. et al. Sodium alginate as an ideal submucosal injection material for endoscopic submucosal resection: preliminary experimental and clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1026-1032
- 9 Uraoka T, Kawahara Y, Ohara N. et al. Carbon dioxide submucosal injection cushion: an innovative technique in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Digest Endosc 2011; 23: 5-9
- 10 Liu W, Wang M, Zhao L. et al. Thermo-sensitive isopentane aerification for mucosal lift during endoscopic resection in animal models (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 1168-1175 e1163
- 11 Sundararaghavan HG, Monteiro GA, Lapin NA. et al. Genipin-induced changes in collagen gels: correlation of mechanical properties to fluorescence. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008; 87: 308-320
- 12 Yunoki S, Ohyabu Y, Hatayama H. Temperature-responsive gelation of type I collagen solutions involving fibril formation and genipin crosslinking as a potential injectable hydrogel. Int J Biomater 2013; 2013: 620765
- 13 Narita T, Yunoki S, Ohyabu Y. et al. In situ gelation properties of a collagen-genipin sol with a potential for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers. Med Devices (Auckl) 2016; 9: 429-439
- 14 Sung HW, Huang RN, Huang LL. et al. Feasibility study of a natural crosslinking reagent for biological tissue fixation. J Biomed Mat Res 1998; 42: 560-567
- 15 Yunoki S, Hatayama H, Ebisawa M. et al. A novel fabrication method to create a thick collagen bundle composed of uniaxially aligned fibrils: an essential technology for the development of artificial tendon/ligament matrices. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 2015; 103: 3054-3065
- 16 Ruszczak Z, Schwartz RA. Collagen uses in dermatology – an update. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) 1999; 199: 285-289
- 17 Charriere G, Bejot M, Schnitzler L. et al. Reactions to a bovine collagen implant. Clinical immunologic study in 705 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 1203-1208
- 18 Macaya D, Spector M. Injectable collagen-genipin gel for the treatment of spinal cord injury: in vitro studies. Advanced Functional Materials 2011; 21: 4788-4797
- 19 Yen Chang C-CT, Huang-Chien Liang, Hsing-Wen Sung. In vivo evaluation of cellular an acellular bovine pericardia fixed with a naturally occurring crosslinking agent (genipin). Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2447-2457