Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-0869-7270
Inverted “upside-down” esophageal fully-covered self-expanding metal stent is effective for temporary treatment of colorectal strictures: a pilot case series
Publication History
submitted 06 April 2018
accepted after revision 06 August 2018
Publication Date:
12 June 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/201906/lookinside/thumbnails/1203_10-1055-a-0869-7270-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Placement of a fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FC-SEMS) is a valid alternative for benign and malignant colorectal strictures treatment. Despite the reportedly high technical success rate, stenting is still challenging, due to high rates of adverse events. Migration still represents the main issue, although several anti-migration systems have been proposed.
Patients and methods Before insertion, esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMSs were inverted and reloaded on the deployment device to invert the proximal and distal parts of the stent, with the largest end placed above the stricture to contrast peristaltic activity. The inverted “upside-down” Beta Niti-S FC-SEMS was placed in five consecutive patients: four pts with benign anastomotic stricture unresponsive to repeated balloon dilation and persisting for at least 10 weeks, and one with malignant rectal neoplasia. In five patients, six inverted FC-SEMSs were placed.
Results The modified FC-SEMS did not migrate in 5/6 cases (83 %). Stent migration occurred in the neoplastic case, induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The “upside-down” esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMS stayed in place for an average of 6 weeks, achieving resolution of stricture in all patients but one, who required an additional stent placement, due to incomplete stricture resolution after 6 weeks.
Conclusion The inverted esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMSs proved to be effective in treating colorectal stricture in all cases, with no spontaneous migration or significant side effects, and achieved resolution of strictures where a traditional approach, recommended by guidelines, failed.
-
References
- 1 Suchan KL, Muldner A, Manegold BC. Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colorectal anastomotic strictures. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1110-1113
- 2 Dai Y, Chopra SS, Wysocki WM. et al. Treatment of benign colorectal strictures by temporary stenting with self-expanding stents. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 1475-1479
- 3 Currie A, Christmas C, Aldean H. et al. Systematic review of self-expanding stents in the management of benign colorectal obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2013; 16: 239-245
- 4 Forshaw M, Sankararajah D, Stewart M. et al. Self-expanding metallic stents in the treatment of benign colorectal disease: indications and outcomes. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 102-111
- 5 Caruso A, Conigliaro R, Manta R. et al. Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for refractory anastomotic colorectal strictures. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 1175-1178
- 6 Cereatti F, Fiocca F, Dumont JL. et al. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent in the treatment of postsurgical colorectal diseases: outcome in 29 patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 180-188
- 7 Ji JS, Lee BI, Kim HK. et al. Antimigration property of a newly designed covered metal stent for esophageal stricture: an in vivo animal study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 148-153
- 8 de Wijkerslooth LR, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Endoscopic management of difficult or recurrent esophageal strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 2080-2091
- 9 Chen T, Hsu WL. Successful treatment of colorectal anastomosis stricture by using sphincterotomes. Front Surg 2014; 1: 22
- 10 Osera S, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting margins for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 770-773
- 11 Bonin E, Baron T. Update on the indications and use of colonic stent. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010; 12: 374-382
- 12 Vanbiervliet G, Bichard P, Demarquay J. et al. Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign colonic strictures. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 35-41
- 13 Påhlman L, Glimelius B, Frykholm G. Ischaemic strictures in patients treated with a low anterior resection and perioperative radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 605-606
- 14 Virgilio C, Cosentino S, Favara C. et al. Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colonic strictures using an achalasia dilator: short-term and long-term results. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 219-222
- 15 Park CH, Yoon JY, Park SJ. et al. Clinical efficacy of endoscopic treatment for benign colorectal stricture: ballon dilation versus stenting. Gut and Liver 2015; 9: 73-79
- 16 van Halsema EE, van Hooft JE, Small AJ. et al. Perforation in colorectal stenting: a meta-analysis and a search for risk factors. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 970-982
- 17 Currie A, Christmas C, Aldean H. et al. Systematic review of self-expanding stents in the management of benign colorectal obruction. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 239-245
- 18 Small A, Young-Fadok T, Baron T. Expandable metal stent placement for benign colorectal obstruction: outcomes for 23 cases. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 454-462
- 19 Yang D, Seo M, Lee H. et al. Stent-in-stent technique and endoscopic resection of granulation tissue to remove a migrated metal duodenal stent embedded in the colon. Endoscopy 2014; 46: E159-E160
- 20 Rejchrt S, Kopacova M, Brozik J. et al. Biodegradable stents for the treatment of benign stenosis of the small and large intestines. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 911-917
- 21 Repici A, Pagano N, Rando G. et al. A retrospective analysis of early and late outcome of biodegradable stent placement in the management of refractory anastomotic colorectal strictures. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2487-2491