Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(11): C5
DOI: 10.1055/a-0884-6058
Correction
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

Carl-Fredrik Rönnow
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Noriya Uedo
2   Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
,
Ervin Toth
3   Department of Clinical Sciences, Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Henrik Thorlacius
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 23 April 2018

accepted after revision 31 July 2018

Publication Date:
29 March 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in EuropeEndosc Int Open 2018; 06(11): E1340-E1348
DOI: 10.1055/a-0733-3668

Correction

Carl-Fredrik Rönnow, Noriya Uedo, Ervin Toth et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe Endoscopy International Open 2018; 06: E1340 – E1348. DOI: 10.1055/a-0733-3668
In the above mentioned article table 3 was corrected. Correct is:

Table 3

ESD outcome according to location.

En bloc

R0

Proficiency(cm2/h)


Perforation

ComplicationBleeding


Total

Recurrence

Rectum
N = 173

150
(87%)

128
(74 %)

9
0.6 – 56

3
(2 %)

3
(2 %)

6
(4 %)

4
(2 %)

Distal Colon
N = 72

61
(83 %)

46
(64 %)

7.2
0.6 – 30

4
(6 %)

1
(1 %)

5
(7 %)

2
(3 %)

Proximal Colon
N = 56

29
(54 %)

33
(59 %)

4.8
1.2 – 20

10
(18 %)

3
(5 %)

13
(23 %)

1
(2 %)