RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-0902-4467
Self-study of the non-extension sign in an e-learning program improves diagnostic accuracy of invasion depth of early gastric cancer
Autoren
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 10. November 2018
accepted after revision 01. April 2019
Publikationsdatum:
03. Juli 2019 (online)
Abstract
Background and study aims We developed an e-learning program for endoscopic diagnosis of invasion depth of early gastric cancer (EGC) using a simple diagnostic criterion called non-extension sign, and the contribution of self-study quizzes to improvement of diagnostic accuracy was evaluated.
Methods We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study that recruited endoscopists throughout Japan. After completing a pretest, the participants watched video lectures and undertook post-test 1. The participants were then randomly allocated to either the self-study or non-self-study group, and participants in the first group completed the self-study program that comprised 100-case quizzes. Finally, participants in both groups undertook post-test 2. The primary endpoint was the difference in post-test 2 scores between the groups. The perfect score for the tests was set as 100 points.
Results A total of 423 endoscopists completed the pretest and were enrolled. Post-test 1 was completed by 415 endoscopists and 208 were allocated to the self-study group and 207 to the non-self-study group. Two hundred and four in the self-study group and 205 in the non-self-study group were included in the analysis. Video lectures improved the mean score of post-test 1 from 72 to 77 points. Participants who completed the self-study quizzes showed significantly better post-test 2 scores compared with the non-self-study group (80 vs. 76 points, respectively, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions Our e-learning program showed that self-study quizzes consolidated knowledge of the non-extension sign and improved diagnostic ability of endoscopists for invasion depth of EGC.
-
References
- 1 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: 1-9
- 2 Nagahama T, Yao K, Imamura K. et al. Diagnostic performance of conventional endoscopy in the identification of submucosal invasion by early gastric cancer: the “non-extension sign” as a simple diagnostic marker. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: 304-313
- 3 Abe S, Oda I, Shimazu T. et al. Depth-predicting score for differentiated early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 35-40
- 4 Sano T, Okuyama Y, Kobori O. et al. Early gastric cancer endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 1340-1344
- 5 Tsujii Y, Kato M, Inoue T. et al. Integrated diagnostic strategy for the invasion depth of early gastric cancer by conventional endoscopy and EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 452-459
- 6 Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP. et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoscopy for prediction of depth of tumor invasion in early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 705-713
- 7 Yanai H, Noguchi T, Mizumachi S. et al. A blind comparison of the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in staging early gastric cancer. Gut 1999; 44: 361-365
- 8 Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP. et al. Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 917-927
- 9 Pimentel-Nunes P, Buxbaum J. Internet based e-learning systems: a tool for the future in endoscopy. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 936-937
- 10 Yao K, Uedo N, Muto M. et al. Development of an E-learning system for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. EBioMedicine 2016; 9: 140-147
- 11 Yao K, Uedo N, Muto M. et al. Development of an e-learning system for teaching endoscopists how to diagnose early gastric cancer: basic principles for improving early detetion. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: S28-S38
- 12 Nakanishi H, Doyama H, Ishikawa H. et al. Evaluation of an e-learning system for diagnosis of gastric lesions using magnifying narrow-band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 957-967
