CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(12): E1652-E1657
DOI: 10.1055/a-0961-7890
Innovation forum
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: experimental and clinical evaluation study (with video)

Takeshi Ogura
1   2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
,
Yosuke Nakai
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Takuji Iwashita
3   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Kazuhide Higuchi
1   2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
,
Takao Itoi
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 February 2019

accepted after revision 20 May 2019

Publication Date:
25 November 2019 (online)

The most important among the steps of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is the success of tract dilation. Electrocautery dilation can certainly dilate the biliary or luminal wall. However, bleeding may occur around the dilation site due to burning effects. Here, we describe some technical tips for tract dilation in EUS-BD using a novel electrocautery device. We attempted EUS-BD using the novel electrocautery dilator in 12 patients, among whom nine and three underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage, respectively. Severe adverse events were not seen in any patients although abdominal pain, which might occur due to stent expansion, was seen in one patient. The novel electrocautery dilator could be inserted into the biliary tract and gallbladder after guidewire placement, and the stent delivery system could also be inserted without additional dilation. Therefore, technical success was achieved in all patients. The procedural durations were less than 20 minutes for each technique. In conclusion, the novel electrocautery dilator might be useful as a tract dilation device, although additional cases and prospective evaluation studies are essential to confirm our results.

 
  • References

  • 1 Giovannini M, Dotti M, Bories E. et al. Hepaticogastrostomy by echo-endoscopy as a palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 1076-1078
  • 2 Paik WH, Park DH, Choi JH. et al. Simplified fistula dilation technique and modified stent deployment maneuver for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 5051-5019
  • 3 Amano M, Ogura T, Onda S. et al. Prospective clinical study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using novel balloon catheter (with video). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32: 716-720
  • 4 Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1276-1284
  • 5 Ogura T, Nakai Y, Itoi T. Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019; 26: E3-E4
  • 6 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: Report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 7 Hedjoudje A, Sportes A, Grabar S. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 60-68
  • 8 Ogura T, Higuchi K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: Current status and future prospects. Dig Endosc 2019; 31 (Suppl. 01) 55-64
  • 9 Honjo M, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T. et al. Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 376-382
  • 10 Walter D, Teoh AY, Itoi T. et al. EUS-guided gall bladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a prospective long-term evaluation. Gut 2016; 65: 6-8