Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0965-5766
Wirkung von kontinuierlicher Kühlung auf Schwellung, Beweglichkeit, Schmerz und Blutverlust
Systematischer ReviewEffect of Consistent Cooling on Effusion, Mobility, Pain and Blood LossSystematic ReviewPublication History
20 February 2018
18 March 2019
Publication Date:
24 July 2019 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund Bei der Anwendung von Kryotherapie gehört die Continuous Flow Cold Therapy (CFCT) zu den moderneren Anwendungsformen.
Ziel Diese Literaturübersichtsarbeit untersuchte die Wirkungen von Kältetherapie bei Personen nach einer Kniegelenkprothesenoperation.
Methode Die Literatursuche fand in den Datenbanken Cochrane, Embase und PubMed im Zeitraum Januar 2018 bis Juli 2018 statt. Eingeschlossen wurden randomisierte kontrollierte klinische Studien in deutscher oder englischer Sprache. Die Zielparameter umfassten Schwellung, maximale Beweglichkeit, Schmerz und Blutverlust. Die Bewertung der Studien erfolgte mithilfe der PEDro-Skala.
Ergebnisse Es wurden 8 prospektive Studien mit 832 Probanden eingeschlossen. Der PEDro-Score lag im Median bei 4,5 von 10 Punkten. Die Messungen waren sehr heterogen. Nur wenige Studien fanden signifikante Unterschiede zwischen der Interventions- und der Kontrollgruppe für die Zielparameter Schwellung, Schmerzen oder Beweglichkeit. Statistisch signifikante Unterschiede waren kaum klinisch relevant. Beim Blutverlust ergaben sich signifikante und klinisch relevante Unterschiede.
Schlussfolgerungen Die Ergebnisse zeigten keinen Nutzen der kontinuierlichen Kühlung gegenüber Kühl- oder Eispackungen. CFCT-Geräte riefen keine schädigenden Effekte hervor und können daher weiterhin genutzt werden.
Abstract
Background Continuous flow cold therapy (CFCT) is an up-to-date application of cryotherapy.
Objective This review investigated the effects of cryotherapy in subjects following knee arthroplasty.
Method The databases Cochrane, Embase and PubMed were searched for randomised controlled clinical trials in German or English published from January 2008 until July 2018. Outcome measures included effusion, mobility, pain and blood loss. The studies were evaluated using the PEDro scale.
Results Eight prospective studies with 832 subjects were included. PEDro scores attained a mean value of 4.5 out of 10 points (median). The assessments were very heterogeneous. Only few studies found significant differences between the intervention and control groups for the outcome measures effusion, pain or mobility. Statistically significant differences had little clinical relevance. Blood loss showed statistically and clinically significant differences.
Conclusions The results indicated no benefit of consistent cooling compared to cold- and ice-packs. CFCT devices showed no hazard effects and therefore may still be used.
-
Literatur
- 1 Bundesamt für Statistik, Schweiz. Gesundheitsstatistik 2014. www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/news/publikationen.html?publicationID=%205765 (15.08.2016)
- 2 Schmidt KL, Drexel H, Jochheim KA. (Hrsg). Lehrbuch der physikalischen Medizin und Rehabilitation. Stuttgart: G. Fischer; 1995
- 3 Hüter-Becker A, Dölken M. (Hrsg). Physikalische Therapie, Massage, Elektrotherapie und Lymphdrainage. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2011
- 4 Medzhitov R. Inflammation 2010: new adventures of an old flame. Cell 2010; 6: 771-776 . doi: org/10.1016
- 5 Markert SE. The use of cryotherapy after a total knee replacement: A literature review. Orthop Nurs 2011; 30: 29-36 . doi:10.1097/NOR.0b013e318205749a
- 6 Thienpont E. Does advanced cryotherapy reduce pain and narcotic consumption after knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 3417-3423 . doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3810-8
- 7 Desteli EE, Imren Y, Aydın N. Effect of both preoperative and postoperative cryoceutical treatment on hemostasis and postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 19150-19155
- 8 CoolSystems Inc. Game Ready Control Unit User’s Manual. 2014 www.gameready.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/GR21-CU-UM-703995B-ML-GER.pdf (15.08.2016)
- 9 DJO. Knee Cryo/Cuff IC: Patient Information. 2010 www.djoglobal.com/sites/default/files/CryoCuff%20IC%20Knee%20Patient%20Information%2000-0867%20rev%20B.PDF (15.08.2016)
- 10 Waegener Health Care Applications. Waegener’s cTreatment. 2016 www.c-treatment.com (15.08.2016)
- 11 Ener-C AG. CTM Therapy. 2016 www.ener-c.com (15.08.2019)
- 12 Barry S, Wallace L, Lamb S. Cryotherapy after total knee replacement: a survey of current practice. Physiother Res Int 2003; 8: 111-120 . doi:org/10.1002/pri.279
- 13 Adie S, Kwan A, Naylor JM. et al. Cryotherapy following total knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; CD007911 . doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007911.pub2
- 14 Bech M, Moorhen J, Cho M. et al. Device or ice: The effect of consistent cooling using a device compared with intermittent cooling using an ice bag after total knee arthroplasty. Physiother Can 2015; 67: 48-55 . doi:10.3138/ptc.2013-78
- 15 Van Wingerden BAM. Eistherapie – kontraindiziert bei Sportverletzungen. Leistungssport 1992; 2: 5-8
- 16 Wolf U. Evidenz für Kryotherapie bei Verletzungen und Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates. physioscience 2005; 1: 120-128 . doi:10.1055/s-2005-858736
- 17 Martimbianco AL, Gomes da Silva BN, de Carvalho AP. et al. Effectiveness and safety of cryotherapy after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A systematic review of the literature. Phys Ther Sport 2014; 15: 261-268 . doi:org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.008
- 18 Demoulin C, Brouwers M, Darot S. et al. Comparison of gaseous cryotherapy with more traditional forms of cryotherapy following total knee arthroplasty. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 55: 229-240 . doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2012.03.004
- 19 Kuyucu E, Bülbül M, Kara A. et al. Is cold therapy really efficient after knee arthroplasty?. Ann Med Surg 2015; 4: 475-478 . doi:org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.10.019
- 20 Ruffilli A, Castagnini F, Traina F. et al. Temperature-controlled continuous cold flow device after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial study. J Knee Surg 2017; 30: 675-681
- 21 Sadoghi P, Hasenhütl S, Gruber G. et al. Impact of a new cryotherapy device on early rehabilitation after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA): A prospective randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 2018; 42: 1265-1273 . doi:org/10.1007/s00264-018-3766-5
- 22 Su EP, Perna M, Boettner F. et al. A prospective, multi-center, randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of a cryopneumatic device on total knee arthroplasty recovery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (11) 153-156 . doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30832
- 23 De Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Austr J Physiother 2009; 55: 129-133 . doi:org/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1
- 24 Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD. et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713-721 . doi:org/10.1093/ptj/83.8.713
- 25 DonJoy. IceMan®CLEAR3, IceMan®CLASSIC & IceMan®CLASSIC3. Cold Therapy Units. Instructions for Use. 2018 www.djoglobal.com/sites/default/files/13-4446-9_B_IFU%2C%20DONJOY%20ICEMAN_0.pdf
- 26 Hilotherm. Ein neues Therapieverfahren: Gradgenau, punktgenau, natürlich. 2019 www.hilotherm.com
- 27 Oesch P, Hilfiker R, Keller S. et al. Assessments in der Rehabilitation. Bd. 2: Bewegungsapparat. Bern: Huber; 2011
- 28 Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 633-638
- 29 Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP. et al. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 485-489
- 30 Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. EMJ 2001; 18: 205-207
- 31 Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J. et al. Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med 2003; 15: 441-446
- 32 Schomacher J. Gütekriterien der visuellen Analogskala zur Schmerzbewertung. Quality Criteria of the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain Assessment. physioscience 2008; 4: 125-128 . doi:10.1055/s-2008-1027685
- 33 Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R. et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412 . doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030
- 34 Lijmer J, Mol B, Heisterkamp S. et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 11: 1061-1066 . doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1061
- 35 Cina-Tschumi B. Evidenz-basierte Pflege am Beispiel von Kälteanwendungen nach ausgewählten orthopädischen Eingriffen – eine Literaturstudie. Pflege 2007; 5: 258-267 . doi:org/10.1024/1012-5302.20.5.258
- 36 Albrecht G. Dermatologische Symptome. In: Aulbert E. Lehrbuch der Palliativmedizin. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1997
- 37 Piriyaprasarth P, Morris ME. Psychometric properties of measurement tools for quantifying knee joint position and movement: A systematic review. Knee 2007; 14: 2-8 . doi:org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.10.006
- 38 Blutspende SRK Schweiz. Spenderinformationen. 2018 www.blutspende.ch/de/blutspende/spenderinformationen (04.01.2019)
- 39 Dundon JM, Rymer MC, Johnson RM. Total patellar skin loss from cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 2: 376.e5-376.e7 . doi:org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.024