Endoscopy International Open, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(12): E1755-E1760
DOI: 10.1055/a-0967-4744

Original article

Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD

Motohiko Kato

¹Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Motoki Sasaki

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Mari Mizutani

¹Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Koshiro Tsutsumi

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Yoshiyuki Kiguchi

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Teppei Akimoto

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Makoto Mutaguchi

¹Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Atsushi Nakayama

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Kaoru Takabayashi

³Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Ai Fujimoto

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Yasutoshi Ochiai

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Tadateru Maehata

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Takanori Kanai

¹Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

,

Naohisa Yahagi

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background and study aims Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still considered technically challenging; however, few studies have objectively analyzed predictors of the technical difficulty. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to elucidate predictors of the technical difficulty of duodenal ESD.

Patients and methods This was a retrospective observational study. From June 2010 to June 2017, a total of 174 consecutive patients with superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD were included in this study. We tried to identify predictors for technical difficulty of ESD by defining technical difficulty as either procedure time > 100 minutes or intraprocedural perforation. Moreover, we constructed a scoring system consisting of factors that were significant in the multivariate analysis.

Results The proportion of patients with technical difficulty was 34.5 %. In the multivariate analysis, lesion location in flexural part [odds ratio (OR), 2.61; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.02 – 6.68], larger lesion size (> 40 mm) (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.15 – 12.9), and occupied circumference > 50 % of the duodenum (OR, 5.80; 95 % CI, 1.83 – 18.4) were associated with technical difficulty.

Conclusion A lesion location in flexural part, lesion size >40 mm and occupied circumference > 50 % were risk factors for technical difficulty of duodenal ESD.

References
1 Murray MA, Zimmerman MJ, Ee HC. Sporadic duodenal adenoma is associated with colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2004; 53: 261-265
2 Burgerman A, Baggenstoss AH, Cain JC. Primary malignant neoplasms of the duodenum, exclusing the papilla of vater; a clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Gastroenterology 1956; 30: 421-431
3 Barclay TH, Kent HP. Primary carcinoma of the duodenum. Gastroenterology 1956; 30: 432-446
4 Arai T, Murata T, Sawabe M. et al. Primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum in the elderly: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 17 cases. Pathol Int 1999; 49: 23-29
5 Fischer HP, Zhou H. Pathogenesis of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004; 11: 301-309
6 Kim HK, Lo SK. Endoscopic approach to the patient with benign or malignant ampullary lesions. Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America 2013; 23: 347-383
7 Kakushima N, Kanemoto H, Tanaka M. et al. Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 12501-12508
8 Goda K, Kikuchi D, Yamamoto Y. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in Japan: Multicenter case series. Dig Endosc 2014; 26 (Suppl. 02) 23-29
9 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Chathadi KV, Khashab MA. et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 773-781
10 Horiki N, Omata F, Uemura M. et al. Risk for local recurrence of early gastric cancer treated with piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection during a 10-year follow-up period. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 72-78
11 Katada C, Muto M, Manabe T. et al. Local recurrence of squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 219-225
12 Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y. et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 635-640
13 Kato M, Nishida T, Hamasaki T. et al. Outcomes of ESD for patients with early gastric cancer and comorbid liver cirrhosis: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 1560-1566
14 Kato M, Nishida T, Yamamoto K. et al. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group. Gut 2013; 62: 1425-1432
15 Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O. et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 775-783
16 Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group. J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 325-331
17 Yahagi N, Kato M, Ocihai Y. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 676-682
18 Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumor. Digestion 2017; 95: 36-42
19 Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 270-274
20 Takahashi T, Ando T, Kabeshima Y. et al. Borderline cases between benignancy and malignancy of the duodenum diagnosed successfully by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1377-1383
21 Endo M, Abiko Y, Oana S. et al. Usefulness of endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenoma. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 360-365
22 Jung JH, Choi KD, Ahn JY. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 133-135
23 Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Yoshida Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors: a single-center experience. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 136-137
24 Kakushima N. Hurdles of duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection, delayed bleeding and perforation. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 298-299
25 Nonaka S, Oda I, Tada K. et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal tumors. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 129-135
26 Imagawa A, Okada H, Kawahara Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 987-990
27 Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K. et al. Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 862-870
28 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
29 Kato M, Yahagi N. Advanced endoscopic treatment of gastric and duodenal neoplasms: beyond standard EMR and ESD. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1423-1426
30 Yahagi N, Nishizawa T, Sasaki M. et al. Water pressure method for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E227-E228
31 Miura Y, Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y. et al. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 8-14
32 Tashima T, Nonaka K, Kurumi H. et al. Successful traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection using dental floss and a clip for a huge superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumor with severe fibrosis (with video). JGH Open 2019; 3: 179-181
33 Goda Y, Mori H, Kobara H. et al. Efficacy of sufficient operation view by ring-shaped thread counter traction for safer duodenal ESD. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2018; 27: 327-332