Die digitale Abformung in der implantatprothetischen Behandlung

Gerade im Bereich der zahnmedizinischen Prothetik haben sich in den letzten Jahren viele technische und materialtechnische Erneuerungen auf dem Markt entwickelt. Insbesondere der Bereich der digitalen Abformung scheint eine immer größere Bedeutung zu gewinnen und in Kombination mit der CAD/CAM-Fertigungstechnologie neue Behandlungsoptionen zu ermöglichen. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich grundlegend mit der digitalen Abformung und deren Anwendung in der implantatprothetischen Behandlung.

• Literatur

• 1 Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 559-570
• 2 Weidhüner W. Potenzial-Analyse im Dentallabor. Zahntechnik Magazin. Im Internet: https://www.ztm-aktuell.de/management/laborfuehrung/story/potenzial-analyse-im-dentallabor__3788.html Stand: 30.07.2019
• 3 DIN EN ISO 12836:2015-11; Zahnheilkunde – Digitalisierungsgeräte für CAD/CAM-Systeme für indirekte dentale Restaurationen – Prüfverfahren zur Beurteilung der Genauigkeit (ISO 12836:2015). Berlin: Beuth; 2015
• 4 Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P. et al. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 35-41
• 5 Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M. et al. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Sci 2018; 60: 1-7
• 6 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-19
• 7 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression – a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
• 8 Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
• 9 Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J. et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;
• 10 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
• 11 Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC. et al. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 277-283
• 12 Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty MHM, Moharrami M. Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 929-935
• 13 Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D. et al. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017; 10: 101-120
• 14 Flügge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG. et al. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 374-392
• 15 Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps I. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202916
• 16 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P. et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016; 55: 68-74
• 17 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T. et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1495-1504
• 18 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of software on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31: 375-376
• 19 Delize V, Bouhy A, Lambert F. et al. Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient-centered outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;
• 20 Joda T, Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 1401-1406
• 21 Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B. et al. In vitro comparison of analog versus digital impressions of the periodontally compromised dentition focused on interdental areas. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 131-138
• 22 Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 142-154
• 23 Duran JC, Aguirre F, Pino R. et al. Dimensional Variations in the Soft Tissue Profile After Removal of Implant-Supported Fixed Interim Restorations: A Pilot Clinical Study. Implant Dent 2018; 27: 28-32
• 24 Monaco C, Scheda L, Baldissara P. et al. Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 536-540
• 25 Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 395-397
• 26 Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T. et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 436-442