Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128(09): 429-435
DOI: 10.1055/a-0982-7159
Fortbildung | Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die digitale Abformung in der implantatprothetischen Behandlung

Dominik Kraus
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Gerade im Bereich der zahnmedizinischen Prothetik haben sich in den letzten Jahren viele technische und materialtechnische Erneuerungen auf dem Markt entwickelt. Insbesondere der Bereich der digitalen Abformung scheint eine immer größere Bedeutung zu gewinnen und in Kombination mit der CAD/CAM-Fertigungstechnologie neue Behandlungsoptionen zu ermöglichen. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich grundlegend mit der digitalen Abformung und deren Anwendung in der implantatprothetischen Behandlung.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 559-570
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Weidhüner W. Potenzial-Analyse im Dentallabor. Zahntechnik Magazin. Im Internet: https://www.ztm-aktuell.de/management/laborfuehrung/story/potenzial-analyse-im-dentallabor__3788.html Stand: 30.07.2019
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 DIN EN ISO 12836:2015-11; Zahnheilkunde – Digitalisierungsgeräte für CAD/CAM-Systeme für indirekte dentale Restaurationen – Prüfverfahren zur Beurteilung der Genauigkeit (ISO 12836:2015). Berlin: Beuth; 2015
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P. et al. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M. et al. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Sci 2018; 60: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-19
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression – a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J. et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC. et al. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty MHM, Moharrami M. Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D. et al. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017; 10: 101-120
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Flügge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG. et al. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 374-392
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps I. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202916
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P. et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016; 55: 68-74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T. et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1495-1504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of software on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31: 375-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Delize V, Bouhy A, Lambert F. et al. Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient-centered outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Joda T, Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 1401-1406
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B. et al. In vitro comparison of analog versus digital impressions of the periodontally compromised dentition focused on interdental areas. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 131-138
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 142-154
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Duran JC, Aguirre F, Pino R. et al. Dimensional Variations in the Soft Tissue Profile After Removal of Implant-Supported Fixed Interim Restorations: A Pilot Clinical Study. Implant Dent 2018; 27: 28-32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Monaco C, Scheda L, Baldissara P. et al. Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 536-540
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 395-397
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T. et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 436-442
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar