Video anoscopy: results of routine anal examination during colonoscopies

Abstract

Background and study aims Anal examination and video anoscopy (VA) are rarely performed during colonoscopies. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that anal examination and VA provide important information in all routine colonoscopies.

Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 12,151 patients screened by VA which were performed during routine outpatient colonoscopy between 2006 and 2018. The aspects studied were: normal examination; hemorrhoidal disease; thrombosed hemorrhoids; anal fissure; perianal Crohn’s Disease; perianal fistula; condyloma; polyps; neoplasms; stenosis; bleeding.

Results Of the colonoscopies performed on 12,151 patients, 9,364 cases (77.06 %) presented some alterations. Internal I degree hemorrhoids (5911 – 48.65 %); internal hemorrhoids of II, III and IV degrees (2362 – 19.44 %); thrombosed hemorrhoids (120 – 0.99 %); bleeding (56 – 0.46 %); fissure (415 – 3.42 %); perianal fistula (42 – 0.35 %); perianal Crohn’s Disease (34 – 0.28 %); condylomas (18 – 0.15 %); anal stenosis (30 – 0.25 %); other findings (310 – 2.55 %); polyps (62 – 0.51 %), one of which was adenomatous with high-grade dysplasia; four cases of anal canal neoplasia (0.03 %): two cases of squamous cell carcinoma and two cases of adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion The association of routine video anoscopy during colonoscopy improved diagnosis of neoplastic anal lesions, allowed correct classification of the degree of hemorrhoidal disease, helped to confirm the bleeding site and detected other anal pathologies. The main findings were hemorrhoidal diseases, fissures and perianal fistulas. The study suggests that VA should be used in all colonoscopies.

• References

• 1 Harish K, Harikumar R, Sunilkumar K. et al. Videoanoscopy: useful technique in the evaluation of hemorrhoids. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 312-317
• 2 Kelly SM, Sanowski RA, Foutch PG. et al. A prospective comparison of anoscopy and fiberendoscopy in detecting anal lesions. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8: 658-660
• 3 Varadarajulu S, Ramsey WH. Utility of retroflexion in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32: 235-237
• 4 Kwon KA, Hahm KB. Rectal Retroflexion during colonoscopy: a bridge over troubled water. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 3-4
• 5 Cutler AF, Pop A. Fifteen years later: colonoscopic retroflexion revisited. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 1537-1538
• 6 Fu K, Ikematsu H, Sugito M. et al. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon following retroflexion maneuver. Endoscopy 2007; 39 (Suppl. 01) E175
• 7 Chu Q, Petros JG. Extraperitoneal rectal perforation due to retroflexion fiberoptic proctoscopy. Am Surg 1999; 65: 81-85
• 8 Ahlawat SK, Charabty A, Benjamin S. Rectal perforation caused by retroflexion maneuver during colonoscopy: closure with endoscopic clips. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 771-773
• 9 Lazas DJ, Moses FM, Wong RK. Videoendoscopic anoscopy: a new technique for examining the anal canal. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 351-354
• 10 Quallick MR, Brown WR. Rectal perforation during colonoscopic retroflexion: a large, prospective experience in an academic center. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 960-963
• 11 London S, Tichauer M. Anoscopy. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 StatPearls [Internet]. PMID: 29083587
• 12 Elbetti C, Giani I, Novelli E. et al. The single pile classification: a new tool for the classification of haemorrhoidal disease and the comparison of treatment results. Updates Surg 2015; 67: 421-426
• 13 Téllez-Ávila F, Barahona-Garrido J, García-Osogobio S. et al. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of rectal retroflexion: a prospective, single-blind study conducted in three centers. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 79-83
• 14 Saad A, Rex DK. Routine rectal retroflexion during colonoscopy has a low yield for neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 6503-6505
• 15 Lohsiriwat V. Anorectal emergencies. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 5867-5878
• 16 Koning MV, Loffeld RJ. Rectal bleeding in patients with haemorrhoids. Coincidental findings in colon and rectum. Fam Pract 2010; 27: 260-262
• 17 Cheung PS, Wong SK, Boey J. et al. Frank rectal bleeding: a prospective study of causes in patients over the age of 40. I. Postgrad Med J 1988; 64: 364-368
• 18 Henderson PK, Cash BD. Common anorectal conditions: evaluation and treatment. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2014; 16: 408
• 19 Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P. Perianal Crohn's disease: classification and clinical evaluation. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 959-962
• 20 Hughes LE. Clinical classification of perianal Crohnʼs disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 928-932
• 21 Gecse KB, Bemelman W, Kamm MA. et al. A global consensus on the classification, diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of perianal fistulising Crohnʼs disease. Gut 2014; 63: 1381-1392
• 22 Kelley KA, Kaur T, Tsikitis VL. Perianal Crohn’s disease: challenges and solutions. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2017; 10: 39-46
• 23 Albuquerque A. High-resolution anoscopy: Unchartered territory for gastroenterologists?. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 1083-1087
• 24 Uronis HE, Bendell JC. Anal cancer: an overview. Oncologist 2007; 12: 524-534
• 25 Magalhães M. Anal canal squamous carcinoma. J Coloproctol 2017; 37: 72-79
• 26 Grulich AE, Poynten IM, Machalek DA. et al. The epidemiology of anal cancer. Sex Health 2012; 9: 504-508
• 27 Ryan DP, Compton CC, Mayer RJ. Carcinoma of the anal canal. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 792-800
• 28 Tanaka A, Sadahiro S, Suzuki T. et al. Comparisons of rigid proctoscopy, flexible colonoscopy, and digital rectal examination for determining the localization of rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61: 202-206
• 29 Abunassar M, Reinders J, Jonker DJ. et al. Review of anal cancer patients at the Ottawa hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41: 653-658
• 30 Wells JS, Holstad MM, Thomas T. et al. An integrative review of guidelines for anal cancer screening in HIV-infected persons. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2014; 28: 350-357