Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(12): E1671-E1682
DOI: 10.1055/a-1005-6632
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

International multicenter expert survey on endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks

Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
 1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Alessandro Repici
 2   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan; Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Gianfranco Donatelli
 3   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers Paris, France
,
Guilherme Macedo
 1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Jacques Devière
 4   Department of Gastroenterology Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
,
Jeanin E. van Hooft
 5   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Josemberg M. Campos
 6   Department of Surgery, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
,
Manoel Galvao Neto
 7   Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine at Florida International University, Department of Surgery, Miami, Florida, United States
,
Marco Silva
 1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Pierre Eisendrath
 8   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
,
Vivek Kumbhari
 9   Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Mouen A. Khashab*
 9   Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 29. Mai 2019

accepted after revision 05. August 2019

Publikationsdatum:
25. November 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims A variety of endoscopic techniques are currently available for treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) anastomotic leaks; however, no definite consensus exists on the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Our aim was to explore current management of UGI anastomotic leaks.

Methods A survey questionnaire was distributed among international expert therapeutic endoscopists regarding management of UGI anastomotic leaks.

Results A total of 44 % of 163 surveys were returned; 69 % were from gastroenterologists and 56 % had > 10 years of experience. A third of respondents treat between 10 and 19 patients annually. Fifty-six percent use fully-covered self-expandable metal stents as their usual first option; 80% use techniques to minimize migration; 4 weeks was the most common reported stent dwell time. Sixty percent perform epithelial ablation prior to over-the-scope-clip placement or suturing. Regarding endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), 56 % perform balloon dilation and intracavitary EVT in patients with large cavities but small leak defects. Regarding endoscopic septotomy, 56 % consider a minimal interval of 4 weeks from surgery and 90 % consider the need to perform further sessions. Regarding endoscopic internal drainage (EID), placement of two stents and shorter stents is preferred. Persistent inflammation with clinical sepsis was the definition most commonly reported for endoscopic failure. EVT/stent placement and EVT/EID were the therapeutic options most often chosen in patients with previous oncologic surgery and previous bariatric surgery, respectively.

Conclusions There is a wide variation in the management of patients with UGI anastomotic leaks. Future prospective studies are needed to move from an expert- to evidence- and personalization-based care.

* Full list of collaborators ordered alphabetically at the end of the article.


Supplementary material