Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis of early gastric cancer

Abstract

Background and study aims No recommendations are available for optimal number of endoscopic biopsies for early gastric cancer (GC), and whether detection of early GC is improved by increasing the number of biopsy is unclear. We therefore evaluated the relationship between number of biopsies and diagnostic accuracy.

Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated 858 early GCs (623 from endoscopic submucosal dissection and 235 surgical specimens), which we classified as obtained after one, two, or three or more biopsies. We assessed diagnostic accuracy by number of biopsies, and in subgroups by tumor diameter, gross type, and surface color.

Results Almost half the lesions were obtained after one biopsy each, 30 % after two biopsies, and 20 % after three or more biopsies. Although diagnostic accuracy increased with biopsy number, it was significantly greater for the two-biopsy group than the one-biopsy group, (92.5 % vs. 83.9 %, P = 0.0009), but did not significantly differ between the two- and three or more-biopsy groups. This finding was seen when tumors were evaluated by size, but not by elevated type and surface color, for which more biopsies did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that two or more biopsies was the independent significant factors for diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions Two biopsies are the optimal number required to diagnose early GC.

• References

• 1 Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH. et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4: 1553-1568
• 2 Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY. et al. Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing gastric cancer mortality. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 1319-1928
• 3 Muto M, Katada C, Sano Y. et al. Narrow band imaging: a new diagnostic approach to visualize angiogenesis in superficial neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 16-20
• 4 Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K. Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 462-467
• 5 Ezoe Y, Muto M, Uedo N. et al. Magnifying narrowband imaging is more accurate than conventional white-light imaging in diagnosis of gastric mucosal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 2017-2025
• 6 Yao K, Doyama H, Gotoda T. et al. Diagnostic performance and limitations of magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening endoscopy of early gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter feasibility study. Gastric Cancer 2014; 17: 669-679
• 7 Hale MD, Gotoda T, Hayden JD. et al. Endoscopic biopsies from gastrointestinal carcinomas and their suitability for molecular analysis: a review of the literature and recommendations for clinical practice and research. Histopathology 2015; 67: 147-157
• 8 Choi Y, Choi HS, Jeon WK. et al. Optimal number of endoscopic biopsies in diagnosis of advanced gastric and colorectal cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27: 36-39
• 9 JGCA. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-112
• 10 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452-458
• 11 Dekker W, Tytgat GN. Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis. Gastroenterology 1977; 73: 710-714
• 12 Misumi A, Mori K, Ikeda T. et al. Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a study of 339 cases. Gastroenterol. Jpn 1978; 13: 255-263
• 13 Sancho-Poch FJ, Balanzó J, Ocaña J. et al. An evaluation of gastric biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc 1978; 24: 281-282
• 14 Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Okuda S. et al. Prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of gastrofiberscopic biopsy in diagnosis of gastric cancer. Cancer 1989; 63: 1415-1420
• 15 Moehler M, Al-Batran SE, Andus T. et al. German S3-guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric cancer". Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 461-531
• 16 Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 2011; 60: 1449-1472
• 17 Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S. et al. Gastric cancer, version 2. 2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr. Canc Netw 2013; 11: 531-546
• 18 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 620-627
• 19 Johnson B, Basson MD. Absence of complications after endoscopic mucosal biopsy. Dig. Dis 2018; 36: 328-332
• 20 Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M. et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig. Endosc 2016; 28: 3-15
• 21 Katsube T, Konnno S, Hamaguchi K. et al. The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection in the diagnosis and treatment of group III gastric lesions. Anticancer Res 2005; 25: 3513-3516
• 22 Miwa K, Doyama H, Ito R. et al. Can magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging be useful for low grade adenomas in preoperative biopsy specimens?. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15: 170-178
• 23 Kozawa H, Nakazawa S, Yoshino J. Clinical and pathological study on minute and small gastric cancers, with special reference to their macroscopic classification. Gastroenterol Endosc 1985; 27: 1523-1537
• 24 Takahashi H, Hirata K, Sawada S. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of minute gastric cancers. Gastroenterol Endosc 2011; 53: 1229-1240