PDF herunterladen
Augenheilkunde up2date 2020; 10(04): 375-394
DOI: 10.1055/a-1075-9225
Katarakt und refraktive Chirurgie

SMILE – Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

SMILE – Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
Gernot Steinwender
,
Mehdi Shajari
,
Wolfgang J. Mayer
,
Daniel Kook
,
Martin Dirisamer
,
Thomas Kohnen
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Zusammenfassung

Die SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction) zählt zu den Verfahren der refraktiven Lentikel-Extraktion und hat sich im letzten Jahrzehnt zu einem etablierten Bestandteil des modernen refraktivchirurgischen Spektrums entwickelt. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über Patientenselektion, Operationsmethode, mögliche Komplikationen und klinische Ergebnisse dieser Methode.

Abstract

Refractive lenticule extraction is a corneal surgical technique that uses a femtosecond laser exclusively to create an intrastromal refractive lenticule for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) the generated refractive lenticule is subsequently extracted through a small incision. The reported efficacy, predictability and safety of the flap-less SMILE procedure is similar to those of femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Advantages of SMILE over LASIK include less iatrogenic dry eye, fewer induced higher-order aberrations, and potentially less biomechanical weakening of the cornea. However, there is a steeper surgeon learning curve for SMILE as the procedure is technically more challenging than LASIK. Furthermore, the current SMILE laser platform cannot use cyclotorsion control or eye-tracking technology and retreatment options are more complex compared to LASIK. This review looks at patient selection, surgical method, possible complications, retreatment options, and postoperative outcome of the SMILE technique.

Kernaussagen

  • Die SMILE zählt zu den Verfahren der refraktiven Lentikel-Extraktion und wird gegenwärtig zur Myopie- und Astigmatismuskorrektur eingesetzt.

  • Sie bietet eine gute Effektivität und ein hohes Maß an Sicherheit mit klinischen Ergebnissen ähnlich jenen der Femto-LASIK.

  • Der Andockvorgang ist bei dem gänzlich Femtosekundenlaser-basierten Verfahren von großer Bedeutung, da bei diesem Schritt die Zentrierung der Behandlungszone festgelegt wird.

  • Die SMILE erfordert höhere chirurgische Fertigkeiten als die Femto-LASIK und weist eine signifikante Lernkurve auf.

  • Für refraktive Nachkorrekturen bieten sich mehrere Optionen, auch wenn sich noch keine als eindeutiger Standard etablieren konnte.

  • Ein Vorteil der SMILE gegenüber der Femto-LASIK liegt in der geringeren Induktion eines trockenen Auges.

  • Die bei der SMILE im Vergleich zur Femto-LASIK potenziell geringere biomechanische Schwächung der Hornhaut konnte bislang noch nicht in vivo nachgewiesen werden.

Schlüsselwörter

refraktive Chirurgie - SMILE - Operationsmethode - Komplikationen - Ergebnisse

Key words

refractive surgery - SMILE - surgical method - complications - results - refractive lenticule extraction


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Krueger RR, Juhasz T, Gualano A. et al. The picosecond laser for nonmechanical laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 467-469
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Heisterkamp A, Mamom T, Kermani O. et al. Intrastromal refractive surgery with ultrashort laser pulses: in vivo study on the rabbit eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 511-517
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T. et al. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 94-103
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C. et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1513-1520
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S. et al. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol 2013; 91: 355-362
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 335-339
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 127-137
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI. et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Hyperopia: 12-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 442-450
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Reinstein DZ, Pradhan KR, Carp GI. et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Hyperopia: 3-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 24-30
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Pizzarello LD. Refractive changes in pregnancy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 484-488
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Luft N, Schumann RG, Dirisamer M. et al. Wound Healing, Inflammation, and Corneal Ultrastructure After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: A Human Ex Vivo Study. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 393-399
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Morse JS, Schallhorn SC, Hettinger K. et al. Role of depressive symptoms in patient satisfaction with visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 DOG, BVA. Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung refraktiv-chirurgischer Eingriffe durch die DOG und den BVA – KRC-Empfehlungen: Stand Februar 2019. Ophthalmologe 2019; 116: 735-745
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K. Dry Eye After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: Meta-Analysis. Cornea 2017; 36: 85-91
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Gomes JAP, Azar DT, Baudouin C. et al. TFOS DEWS II iatrogenic report. Ocul Surf 2017; 15: 511-538
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Spiru B, Kling S, Hafezi F. et al. Biomechanical Properties of Human Cornea Tested by Two-Dimensional Extensiometry Ex Vivo in Fellow Eyes: Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Versus SMILE. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 419-423
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Shajari M, Jaffary I, Herrmann K. et al. Early Tomographic Changes in the Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 254-259
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Elsheikh A. et al. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 803-810
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM. et al. Functional Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and LASIK: A Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Study. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 230-237
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Chan TCY, Ng ALK, Cheng GPM. et al. Effect of the Learning Curve on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Cornea 2017; 36: 1044-1050
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Shaikh F. et al. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2018; 12: 1685-1699
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ. Coaxially sighted corneal light reflex versus entrance pupil center centration of moderate to high hyperopic corneal ablations in eyes with small and large angle kappa. J Refract Surg 2013; 29: 518-525
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond) 2014; 1: 3
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A. Results of Intraoperative Manual Cyclotorsion Compensation for Myopic Astigmatism in Patients Undergoing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg 2017; 33: 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI. et al. Quality control outcomes analysis of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia by a novice surgeon at the first refractive surgery unit in Nepal during the first 2 years of operation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 267-274
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kind R, Kiraly L, Taneri S. et al. Flushing versus not flushing the interface during small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45: 562-568
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Vetter JM, Faust M, Gericke A. et al. Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2011-2018
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS. et al. Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures. Acta Ophthalmol 2020; 98: e72-e80
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Reinstein DZ. The Surgeonʼs Guide to SMILE: small Incision Lenticule Extraction. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2018
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Rathi A. et al. Learning Curve of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Challenges and Complications. Cornea 2017; 36: 1377-1382
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Jacob S, Agarwal A. White Ring Sign and Sequential Segmental Terminal Lenticular Side Cut Dissection for Uneventful and Complete Lenticular Extraction in SMILE. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 140-141
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Brar AS. et al. “Meniscus Sign” to Identify the Lenticule Edge in Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Cornea 2018; 37: 799-801
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 822-828
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kohnen T, Schwarz L, Remy M. et al. Short-term complications of femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis cuts: Review of 1210 consecutive cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 1797-1803
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ. et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 652-665
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Azar DT. et al. Infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis: results of an ASCRS survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 2001-2006
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Kook D, Mayer WJ, Shajari M. et al. [Enhancements after Refractive Corneal Surgery]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2020; 237: 907-919
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T. et al. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 1224-1234
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Liu Y-C, Rosman M, Mehta JS. Enhancement after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 813-821
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Siedlecki J, Luft N, Kook D. et al. Enhancement After Myopic Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Surface Ablation. J Refract Surg 2017; 33: 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Breyer DRH, Beckers L, Hagen P. et al. [Comparison of Long-term Results with Small Incision Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEX SMILE) vs. Femto-LASIK]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2019; 236: 1201-1207
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Masud M. et al. Surgical options for retreatment after small-incision lenticule extraction: Advantages and disadvantages. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44: 1384-1389
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Siedlecki J, Siedlecki M, Luft N. et al. Surface Ablation Versus CIRCLE for Myopic Enhancement After SMILE: A Matched Comparative Study. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 294-300
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ. et al. Outcomes of Re-treatment by LASIK After SMILE. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 578-588
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y. et al. Clinical Outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK Used to Treat Myopia: A Meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 256-265
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM. et al. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Femtosecond LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 724-730
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I. et al. Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 178: 65-78
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Correction of myopic astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 240-247
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Blum M, Sekundo W. Refraktive Lentikelextraktion – Technik der ReLEx/SMILE. Ophthalmologe 2017; 114: 851-856
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Changes in Astigmatism, Densitometry, and Aberrations After SMILE for Low to High Myopic Astigmatism: A 12-Month Prospective Study. J Refract Surg 2017; 33: 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Liu M, Chen Y, Wang D. et al. Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Cornea 2016; 35: 210-216
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L. et al. Dry Eye Disease after Refractive Surgery: Comparative Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 669-676
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y. et al. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0158176
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Jaycock PD. et al. Effects of variation in depth and side cut angulations in LASIK and thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser: a biomechanical study. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 419-425
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE. et al. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: S85-S89
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2013; 29: 454-460
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Sefat SMM, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M. et al. Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 917-922
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Spiru B, Torres-Netto EA, Kling S. et al. Biomechanical Properties of Human Cornea Tested by Two-Dimensional Extensiometry Ex Vivo in Fellow Eyes: PRK Versus SMILE. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 501-505
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar