Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1107-2711
Impact of observational training on endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and competency for large colorectal polyps: single endoscopist experience
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard treatment for large colorectal polyps. However, it is a specialized technique with limited data on the effectiveness of training methods to acquire this skill. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of observational training on EMR outcomes and competency in an early-stage endoscopist.
Patients and methods A single endoscopist completed comprehensive EMR training, which included knowledge acquisition and direct observation of EMR cases, and proctored supervision, during the third year of gastroenterology fellowship. After training, EMR was independently attempted on 142 consecutive, large (i. e., ≥ 20 mm), non-pedunculated colorectal polyps between July 2014 and December 2017 (mean age 61.7 years; mean polyp size 30.4 mm; en-bloc resection 55 %). Surveillance colonoscopy for evaluation of residual neoplasia was available for 86 % of the cases. Three primary outcomes were evaluated: endoscopic assessment of complete resection, rate of adverse events (AEs), and rate of residual neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy.
Results Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 93 % of cases, the rates of AEs and residual neoplasia were 7.8 % and 7.3 %, respectively. The rate of complete resection remained stable (at 85 % or greater) with increasing experience while rates of AEs and residual neoplasia peaked and decreased after 60 cases.
Conclusions An early-stage endoscopist can acquire the skills to perform effective EMR after completing observational training. At least 60 independent EMRs for large colorectal polyps were required to achieve a plateau for clinically meaningful outcomes.
* Drs. Lee and Kidambi: These authors contributed equally.
Publication History
Received: 25 June 2019
Accepted: 02 December 2019
Article published online:
21 February 2020
© 2020. Owner and Copyright ©
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
-
References
- 1 Conio M, Ponchon T, Blanchi S. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 653-663
- 2 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 3: 270-297
- 3 Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K. et al. Knack and practical technique of colonoscopic treatment focused on endoscopic mucosal resection using snare. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: S38-S42
- 4 Hwang JH, Konda V. ASGE Technology Committee. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 215-226
- 5 Rao AK, Soetikno R, Raju GS. et al. Large sessile serrated polyps can be safely and effectively removed by endoscopic mucosal resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 568-574
- 6 Ma MX, Bourke MJ. Complications of endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon. Best Pract Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 749-767
- 7 Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Singh R. et al. Cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 271-278 e271-272
- 8 Raju GS, Lum PJ, Ross WA. et al. Outcome of emr as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 315-325
- 9 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: Results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the australian colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57-65
- 10 Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2016; 65: 806-820
- 11 Conio M. Competency in endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 969-970
- 12 Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD. et al. Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018; 5: 1352-1360
- 13 Lee RF, Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ. Training and competency in endoscopic mucosal resection. Techniques Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 19: 125-136
- 14 Hunt GC, Coyle WJ, Pais SA. et al. Core curriculum for EMR and ablative techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 725-729
- 15 Bhurwal A, Bartel MJ, Heckman MG. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection: Learning curve for large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 959-968 e957
- 16 Draganov PV, Chang M, Roman RM. et al. Role of observation of live cases done by Japanese experts in the acquisition of ESD skills by a western endoscopist. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 16: 4675-4680
- 17 Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T. Dynamic submucosal injection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20: 497-502
- 18 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Long term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosa resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR study. Gut 2015; 1: 57-65
- 19 Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF. et al. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 234-241
- 20 Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A. et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal lesions ≥1. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 857-865
- 21 Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 859-866
- 22 Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 255-263
- 23 Rex KD, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Recurrence rates after EMR of large sessile serrated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 538-541
- 24 Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Sekiguchi M. et al. An effective training system for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasm. Endoscopy 2011; 12: 1033-1038
- 25 Wani S, Keswani R, Hall M. et al. A prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among advanced endoscopy trainees: The rapid assessment of trainee endoscopy skills study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1758-1767 e1711
- 26 Rex DK, Hassan C, Dewitt JM. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States: Why do we hear so much about it and do so little of it?. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 554-558
- 27 Fuccio L, Repici A, Hassan C. et al. Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut 2018; 67: 1464-1474
- 28 Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Digest Endosc 2010; 22: 302-306