Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife: a retrospective multicenter study

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection allows resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques, due to their location, presence of submucosal fibrosis, or suspected deep mural invasion. It is typically achieved using a dedicated over-the-scope device (full-thickness resection device or FTRD). The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection using an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) knife.

Patients and methods Consecutive patients who underwent full-thickness endoscopic resection at six tertiary care centers from August 2010 to June 2017 were retrospectively included. We conducted a comparative analysis of patient characteristics, technical success, adverse events, and time to discharge between patients treated by a full-thickness resection using an ESD knife.

Results Twenty-one procedures were performed using an ESD knife. En-bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 95.2 % and 65 %, respectively. Clinical symptoms of perforation occurred in 66.7 %. There was no need for surgery or additional endoscopic procedures.

Conclusion Endoscopic full-thickness resection of early colorectal neoplasms using an ESD knife might be feasible and safe. It allows complete resection of lesions with no limitation in size. The technique may be preferable to an other-the-scope resection device in lesions larger than 20 mm, and to surgery in selected cases of low-risk T1 colorectal carcinomas, non-lifting adenomas, submucosal tumors, or technically challenging lesion locations.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. August 2019

Angenommen: 23. Januar 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. April 2020

• References

• 1 Raju GS, Lum PJ, Ross WA. et al. Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 315-325
• 2 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57-65
• 3 Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 697-707
• 4 Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: The narrowing divide between East and West. Dig Endosc Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc 2016; 28: 296-305
• 5 Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I. et al. Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 133-139
• 6 Hong SN, Byeon JS, Lee B-I. et al. Prediction model and risk score for perforation in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 98-108
• 7 Xu J-F, Yang L, Jin P. et al. Endoscopic approach for superficial colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Tumors 2016; 3: 69-80
• 8 Iacopini F, Saito Y, Bella A. et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: predictors and neoplasm-related gradients of difficulty. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E839-E846
• 9 Buess G. Review: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993; 38: 239-245
• 10 Casadesus D. Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: a rapid review. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 3851-3854
• 11 Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JRT. et al. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 280-290
• 12 Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Caldart M. et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1831-1836
• 13 Morino M, Allaix ME, Caldart M. et al. Risk factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal malignant neoplasm. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3683-3690
• 14 Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M. et al. Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 11538-11545
• 15 Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Morino M. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 4841-4852
• 16 Schmidt A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over-the-scope device: first experience. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 719-725
• 17 Schmidt A, Riecken B, Damm M. et al. Endoscopic removal of over-the-scope clips using a novel cutting device: a retrospective case series. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 762-766
• 18 Richter-Schrag H-J, Walker C, Thimme R. et al. Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Chir Z Alle Geb Oper Medizen 2016; 87: 316-325
• 19 Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B. et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 2018; 67: 1280-1289
• 20 Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y. et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2012; 17: 1-29
• 21 Agapov M, Dvoinikova E. Factors predicting clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the rectum and sigmoid colon during the learning curve. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E235-E240
• 22 Youk E-G, Sohn DK, Hong CW. et al. Early outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms according to clinical indications. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59: 403-410
• 23 Tomiki Y, Kawai M, Takehara K. et al. Clinical pathway to discharge 3 days after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 679-686
• 24 Baatrup G, Borschitz T, Cunningham C. et al. Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2680-2683
• 25 Palma P, Horisberger K, Joos A. et al. Local excision of early rectal cancer: is transanal endoscopic microsurgery an alternative to radical surgery?. Rev Espanola Enfermedades Dig Organo Of Soc Espanola Patol Dig 2009; 101: 172-178
• 26 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil R, Friedel D. Current applications of endoscopic suturing. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 777-789
• 27 Sharaiha RZ, Kedia P, Kumta N. et al. Initial experience with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: technical success and reproducibility in the bariatric population. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 164-166
• 28 Valli PV, Mertens J, Bauerfeind P. Safe and successful resection of difficult GI lesions using a novel single-step full-thickness resection device (FTRD®). Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 289-299
• 29 Van der Spek B, Haasnoot K, Meischl C. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum: a single-center case series evaluating indication, efficacy and safety. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E1227-E1234
• 30 Zerz A, Müller-Stich BP, Beck J. et al. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection after transanal local excision of T1 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 919-924
• 31 Van der Pas MH, Meijer S, Hoekstra OS. et al. Sentinel-lymph-node procedure in colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 540-550