PDF herunterladen
Endoscopy 2020; 52(12): 1093-1100
DOI: 10.1055/a-1191-3011
Original article

Diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy after suboptimal bowel preparation in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program

Sandra Baile-Maxía
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Lucía Medina-Prado
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Juan Martínez-Sempere
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Oscar Murcia
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Francisco Ruíz-Gómez
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Juan A. Casellas
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
,
Pedro Zapater
2   Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, CIBERehd, Alicante, Spain
,
Rodrigo Jover
1   Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Current guidelines regarding surveillance after screening colonoscopy assume adequate bowel preparation. However, follow-up intervals after suboptimal cleansing are highly heterogeneous. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening colonoscopy.

Methods An observational study including patients who underwent colonoscopy with suboptimal bowel preparation after positive FIT screening and then repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. Suboptimal preparation was defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of 1 in any segment. Patients with a BBPS score of 0 in any segment or incomplete examination were excluded. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced ADR (AADR), and colorectal cancer rate were calculated for the index and repeat colonoscopies.

Results Of the 2474 patients with FIT-positive colonoscopy at our center during this period, 314 (12.7 %) had suboptimal preparation. Of the 259 (82.5 %) patients who underwent repeat colonoscopy, suboptimal cleansing persisted in 22 (9 %). On repeat colonoscopy, the ADR was 38.7 % (95 %CI 32.6 % to 44.8 %) and the AADR was 14.9 % (95 %CI 10.5 % to 19.4 %). The per-adenoma miss rate was 27.7 % (95 %CI 24.0 % to 31.6 %), and the per-advanced adenoma miss rate was 17.6 % (95 %CI 13.3 % to 22.7 %). After repeat colonoscopy, the post-polypectomy surveillance recommendation changed from 10 to 3 years in 14.7 % of the patients with previous 10-year surveillance recommendation.

Conclusions Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on FIT-positive colonoscopy present a high rate of advanced adenomas in repeat colonoscopy, with major changes in post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations.

Table 1s



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Dezember 2019

Angenommen: 14. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Juni 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Einführung zu:

Colonoscopy with suboptimal bowel preparation after a positive fecal immunochemical test: what lies beneath?Endoscopy 2020; 52(12): 1101-1102
DOI: 10.1055/a-1214-6146

 

  • References

  • 1 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. NEJM 1993; 329: 1753-1759
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rutter MD, Beintaris I, Valori R. et al. World Endoscopy Organization consensus statements on post-colonoscopy and post-imaging colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 909-925
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C. et al. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative colonoscopy. NEJM 2008; 359: 1218-1224
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. NEJM 2010; 8: 1795-2803
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M. et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 378-397
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M. et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 14: 1207-1214
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clark BT, Protiva P, Nagar A. et al. Quantification of adequate bowel preparation for screening or surveillance colonoscopy in men. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 396-405
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF. et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: Position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 775-794
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF. et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 781-794
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 11: 1714-1724
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 4: 686-692
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ. et al. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 224-229
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau J-M. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mangas-Sanjuan C, Jover R, Cubiella J. et al. Endoscopic surveillance after colonic polyps and colorrectal cancer resection. 2018 update. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 42: 188-201
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2680-2685
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Menees SB, Kim HM, Elliott EE. et al. The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kim JS, Kang SH, Moon HS. et al. Impact of bowel preparation quality on adenoma identification during colonoscopy and optimal timing of surveillance. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 3092-3099
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Zorzi M, Senore C, Da Re F. et al. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Gut 2015; 64: 1389-1396
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wong JCT, Chiu H, Kim H. et al. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 607-614
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Jover R, Herraiz M, Alarcon O. et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 444-451
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T. et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-1203
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Chang JY, Moon CM, Lee HJ. et al. Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study. PLoS One 2018; 13: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar