Endoscopic spectrum and practical classification of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) detected during double-balloon enteroscopy

Abstract

Background and study aims Information about the endoscopic characterization of small bowel gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) is limited. The aim of this case study was to describe the endoscopic spectrum of small bowel GISTs and to present a practical classification.

Patients and methods Observational, retrospective, consecutive case series of patients with small bowel GIST.

Results A total of 10 small bowel GISTs were found in patients (6 male, 4 female, mean age 52 years, range 28 to 68).). All patients presented with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (overt, n = 8, occult, n = 2). Most GISTs were present in the proximal or middle small bowel (n = 7). The endoscopic tumor characteristics could be categorized as follows: submucosal round (n = 4), submucosal sessile (n = 2), and invasive/penetrating) (n = 4). The mucosa overlying the tumor was normal (n = 4), grooved (n = 3) or frankly ulcerated (n = 3). Tumor size ranged from 8 mm to 50 mm. Biopsy was negative in all patients with normal mucosa but showed tumor in all patients with ulcerations. Regardless of biopsy results, all patients were sent for surgery. Nine resections were carried out. One patient refused surgery. There were no complications of endoscopy in this cohort.

Conclusion Our series shows that GISTs have a wider spectrum of endoscopic characteristics than previously described. The round type with normal overlying mucosa was equally prevalent as the grooved or ulcerated variant. Endoscopists should be aware of this wide spectrum of presentation of small bowel GIST.

Publication History

Received: 13 November 2018

Accepted: 30 November 2020

Article published online:
17 March 2021

• References

• 1 Pisters PW, Patel SR. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current management. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102: 530-538
• 2 Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet 2013;
• 3 Mullady DK, Tan BR. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 578-585
• 4 Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S. et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy and small bowel tumors: a South-European single-center experience. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1520-1524
• 5 Akyüz U, Erzin Y, Cengiz C. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with double-balloon enteroscopy. Turk J Gastroenterol 2010; 21: 39-41
• 6 Fry LC, Neumann H, Kuester D. et al. Small bowel polyps and tumours: endoscopic detection and treatment by double-balloon enteroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29: 135-142
• 7 Jovanovic I, Krivokapic Z, Menkovic N. et al. Ineffectiveness of capsule endoscopy and total double-balloon enteroscopy to elicit the cause of obscure overt gastrointestinal bleeding: think GIST!. Endoscopy 2011; 43 (Suppl. 02) E91-E92
• 8 Buckley JA, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of small bowel neoplasms: spectrum of disease. Radiographics 1998; 18: 379-392
• 9 Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O. et al. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology 2003; 226: 527-532
• 10 Zagorowicz ES, Pietrzak AM, Wronska E. et al. Small bowel tumors detected and missed during capsule endoscopy: single center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 9043-9048
• 11 Madisch A, Schimming W, Kinzel F. et al. Locally advanced small? bowel adenocarcinoma missed primarily by capsule endoscopy but diagnosed by push enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 861-864
• 12 Hakim FA, Alexander JA, Huprich JE. et al. CT-enterography may identify small bowel tumors not detected by capsule endoscopy: eight year experience at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2914-2919
• 13 Fry LC, Bellutti M, Neumann H. et al. Incidence of bleeding lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes in patients undergoing double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29: 342-349