Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1352-9692
Spondyloarthritis
Therapien im In- und Off-Label-BereichSpondyloarthritisIn- and off-label use of therapies
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
Der Begriff Spondyloarthritis umfasst mehrere Krankheitsbilder, die sich in der Pathophysiologie und im klinischen Erscheinungsbild ähneln. Zu der Gruppe der Spondyloarthritiden werden die axiale Spondyloarthritis, die Psoriasisarthritis, die reaktive Arthritis, die chronisch entzündliche Darmerkrankung (CED)-assoziierte Spondyloarthritis und die undifferenzierte Spondyloarthritis gezählt. Die Auswahl von geeigneten Therapiestrategien mit hoher klinischer Effektstärke basiert stärker auf der Charakterisierung des klinischen Phänotyps und des Manifestationstyps als auf der indikationsbasierten Zuordnung. Durch die Heterogenität der Erkrankung und durch das Fehlen kontrollierter klinischer Studien, die als Endpunkt die Effektivität auf verschiedene Manifestationsformen vorsieht, ist die Evidenzlage für verschiedene Therapieprinzipien bezogen auf das Manifestationslevel niedrig. Dies beschränkt den In-Label-Einsatz verschiedener Wirkprinzipien. Hier besteht ein hoher Bedarf für die Potenzierung von Evidenz, damit effektive Therapien individualisiert im Patientenkollektiv eingesetzt werden können.
SUMMARY
The term “spondyloarthritis” encompasses several clinical indications that are similar in pathophysiology and clinical appearance. Spondyloarthritis includes axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated spondyloarthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis. The selection of suitable therapy strategies with a high clinical effect size is based more on the characterization of the clinical phenotype and the manifestation type than on the indication-based assignment. Due to the heterogeneity of the diseases and the lack of controlled clinical studies, which envisage the effectiveness on various forms of manifestation as an endpoint, the evidence base for various therapeutic principles in relation to the level of manifestation is low. This limits the in-label use of various active principles. There is a high need here for the potentiation of evidence so that effective therapies can be used in an individualized way in this special patient cohort.
Schlüsselwörter
Axiale Spondyloarthritis - Psoriasisarthritis - reaktive Arthritis - Therapieempfehlungen - KlassifikationKeywords
Axial spondyloarthritis - psoriatic arthritis - reactive arthritis - treatment recommendations - classificationPublication History
Article published online:
20 April 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Duba AS, Mathew SD. The Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies. Prim Care 2018; 45: 271-287
- 2 Stolwijk C, van Onna M, Boonen A. et al Global Prevalence of Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68: 1320-1331
- 3 Colmegna I, Cuchacovich R, Espinoza LR. HLA-B27-associated reactive arthritis: pathogenetic and clinical considerations. Clin Microbiol Rev 2004; 17: 348-369
- 4 Peluso R, Di Minno MN, Iervolino S. et al Enteropathic spondyloarthritis: from diagnosis to treatment. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013: 631408
- 5 Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R. et al The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2009; 68: 777-783
- 6 Mandl P, Navarro-Compán V, Terslev L. et al EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015; 74: 1327-1339
- 7 Brandt J, Westhoff G, Rudwaleit M. et al [Adaption and validation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for use in Germany]. Z Rheumatol 2003; 62: 264-273
- 8 Araujo EG, Englbrecht M, Hoepken S. et al Effects of ustekinumab versus tumor necrosis factor inhibition on enthesitis: Results from the enthesial clearance in psoriatic arthritis (ECLIPSA) study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 48: 632-637
- 9 Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH. et al Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet (London, England) 2018; 391: 2213-2224
- 10 Sebastian S, Walker GJ, Kennedy NA. et al Assessment, endoscopy, and treatment in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis during the COVID-19 pandemic (PROTECT-ASUC): a multicentre, observational, case-control study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021
- 11 Ganapati A, Gowri M, Antonisamy B. et al Combination of methotrexate and sulfasalazine is an efficacious option for axial spondyloarthritis in a resource-limited, real-world clinical setting: a prospective cohort study. Clin Rheumatol 2020
- 12 Coates LC, Corp N, van der Windt DA. et al GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations: An Update From the 2020 GRAPPA Annual Meeting. J Rheumatol 2021
- 13 Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A. et al EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2020; 79: 700-712
- 14 Kiltz U, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J. et al [Evidence-based recommendations on diagnostics and therapy of axial spondyloarthritis : S3 guidelines of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) in cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF)]. Z Rheumatol 2017; 76: 111-117
- 15 ASAS. http://www.asas-group.org/ In 2020
- 16 Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P. et al Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis and rheumatism 2006; 54: 2665-2673