Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1396-4086
Paradigm shift in management of acute iatrogenic colonic perforations: 24-year retrospective comprehensive study
Abstract
Background and study aims Through advanced endoscopic clipping techniques, endoscopic treatment of both diagnostic and therapeutic acute iatrogenic colonic perforations has been shown effective. The main purpose of this study was to compare the management of acute iatrogenic perforations (AIPs) of the colon before and after the introduction of advanced clipping techniques.
Methods We conducted a retrospective study from July 1996 to February 2020. The period was divided into two sub periods, Period 1: from July 1996 to December 2012 and Period 2: from January 2013 to March 2020. All AIPs occurring during a colonoscopy and detected during or immediately (< 4 hours) after the procedure, were included in the study.
Results The total number of colonoscopies performed at our hospital was 33055 and 36831 during Periods 1 and 2 respectively. Fifteen perforations were observed in Period 1 and 11 in Period 2. The rate of surgery was 93.3 % % (14/15) in Period 1 and 27.2 % (3 /11) in Period 2 (P < 0.01). The mean hospital stay in Period 1 was 6.9 days and 4 in Period 2 (P < 0.01).
Conclusions Data from this historical cohort have clearly shown a decrease in the surgery rate and the length of hospitalization of AIPs in Period 2 compared to Period 1.
Publication History
Received: 25 November 2020
Accepted: 11 February 2021
Article published online:
27 May 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Paspatis GA, Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM. et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 792-810
- 2 Stock C, Ihle P, Sieg A. et al. Adverse events requiring hospitalization within 30 days after outpatient screening and nonscreening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 419-429
- 3 Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG. et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012; 61: 1050-1057
- 4 Rabeneck L, Saskin R, Paszat LF. Onset and clinical course of bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 520-523
- 5 Derbyshire E, Hungin P, Nickerson C. et al. Colonoscopic perforations in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 861-870
- 6 Paspatis GA, Vardas E, Theodoropoulou A. et al. Complications of colonoscopy in a large public county hospital in Greece. A 10-year study. Digest Liver Dis 2008; 40: 951-957
- 7 Paraskeva KD, Paspatis GA. Management of bleeding and perforation after colonoscopy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 8: 963-972
- 8 Takamaru H, Saito Y, Yamada M. et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic clip closure of perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 494-502.e491
- 9 Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI. et al. Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 1409-1414
- 10 Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United Europ Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 18-29
- 11 Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A. et al. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;
- 12 Voermans RP, Le Moine O, von Renteln D. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 603-608
- 13 Khater S, Rahmi G, Perrod G. et al. Over-the-scope clip (OTSC) reduces surgery rate in the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E389-E394
- 14 Carr-Locke DL. The changing management of colonoscopy-associated perforations. Digestion 2008; 78: 216-217
- 15 Martinek J, Ryska O, Tuckova I. et al. Comparing over-the-scope clip versus endoloop and clips (KING closure) for access site closure: a randomized experimental study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1203-1210
- 16 Shi Q, Chen T, Zhong YS. et al. Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 329-334
- 17 Cho SB, Lee WS, Joo YE. et al. Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 473-479
- 18 Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G. et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625
- 19 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 20 Raju GS, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al. Endoscopic management of colonoscopic perforations (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1380-1388
- 21 Baron TH, Wong Kee Song LM, Zielinski MD. et al. A comprehensive approach to the management of acute endoscopic perforations (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 838-859
- 22 La Torre M, Velluti F, Giuliani G. et al. Promptness of diagnosis is the main prognostic factor after colonoscopic perforation. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e23-e26
- 23 Hawkins AT, Sharp KW, Ford MM. et al. Management of colonoscopic perforations: A systematic review. Am J Surgery 2018; 215: 712-718
- 24 Teoh AY, Poon CM, Lee JF. et al. Outcomes and predictors of mortality and stoma formation in surgical management of colonoscopic perforations: a multicenter review. Arch Surgery 2009; 144: 9-13
- 25 Loske G, Schorsch T, Daseking E. et al. Small intestine grasped by over-the-scope-clip during attempt to close an iatrogenic colonic perforation. Endoscopy 2016; 48: E26-E27
- 26 Rahmi G, Barret M, Samaha E. et al. Ureteral obstruction after colonoscopic perforation closed with an over-the-scope clip. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 470-471 ; discussion 471-172
- 27 Velegraki M, Trikola A, Vasiliadis K. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32: 482-488
- 28 Haito-Chavez Y, Law JK, Kratt T. et al. International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 610-622
- 29 Horenkamp-Sonntag D, Liebentraut J, Engel S. et al. Use of over-the-scope clips in the colon in clinical practice: results from a German administrative database. Endoscopy 2020;
- 30 Luning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB. et al. Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 994-997
- 31 Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B. et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 2018; 67: 1280-1289
- 32 Kobara H, Mori H, Nishiyama N. et al. Over-the-scope clip system: A review of 1517 cases over 9 years. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34: 22-30
- 33 Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D. et al. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut 2017; 66: 1779-1789