Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endoscopy 2021; 09(06): E911-E917
DOI: 10.1055/a-1452-8919
Original article

Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Rutger Quispel
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
,
Hannah M. Schutz
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
,
Nora D. Hallensleben
2   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
Abha Bhalla
3   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HAGA Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands
,
Robin Timmer
4   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
,
Jeanin E. van Hooft
5   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
6   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Netherlands
,
Niels G. Venneman
7   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
,
Nicole S. Erler
8   Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
Bart J. Veldt
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
,
Lydi M.J.W. van Driel
9   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
,
Marco J. Bruno
9   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a tool widely used to diagnose bile duct lithiasis. In approximately one out of five patients with positive findings at EUS, sludge is detected in the bile duct instead of stones. The objective of this study was to establish the agreement among endosonographers regarding: 1. presence of common bile duct (CBD) stones, microlithiasis and sludge; and 2. the need for subsequent treatment.

Patients and methods 30 EUS videos of patients with an intermediate probability of CBD stones were evaluated by 41 endosonographers. Experience in EUS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and the endosonographers’ type of practices were recorded. Fleiss’ kappa statistics were used to quantify the agreement. Associations between levels of experience and both EUS ratings and treatment decisions were investigated using mixed effects models.

Results A total of 1230 ratings and treatment decisions were evaluated. The overall agreement on EUS findings was fair (Fleiss’ κ 0.32). The agreement on presence of stones was moderate (κ 0.46). For microlithiasis it was fair (κ 0.25) and for sludge it was slight (κ 0.16). In cases with CBD stones there was an almost perfect agreement for the decision to subsequently perform an ERC + ES. In case of presumed microlithiasis or sludge an ERC was opted for in 78 % and 51 % of cases, respectively. Differences in experience and types of practice appear unrelated to the agreement on both EUS findings and the decision for subsequent treatment.

Conclusions There is only slight agreement among endosonographers regarding the presence of bile duct sludge. Regarding the need for subsequent treatment of bile duct sludge there is no consensus.

Supplementary material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. September 2020

Angenommen: 20. Januar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Mai 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany