Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-1467-6257
Prophylactic colectomy and rectal preservation in FAP: systematic endoscopic follow-up and adenoma destruction changes natural history of polyposis
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/202107/lookinside/thumbnails/2316_10-1055-a-1467-6257-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Prophylactic surgery of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) includes total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) to proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA). Surgical guidelines rely on studies without systematic endoscopic follow-up and treatment. Our aim was to report our experience based on a different approach: therapeutic follow-up, comparing in this setting IRA and IAA in terms of oncological safety and quality of life.
Patients and methods Between January 1965 and November 2015, all patients who underwent prophylactic surgery for FAP with therapeutic endoscopic follow-up in Lyon University hospital: systematic endoscopic treatment of adenomas, were retrospectively and prospectively (since 2011) included.
Results A total of 296 patients were analyzed: 92 had proctocolectomy with IAA (31.1 %), 197 total colectomy with IRA (66.5 %), and seven abdominoperineal resections (2.4 %). Median follow-up was 17.1 years (range, 0–38.1). Incidence of secondary cancer (IR vs. IAA) was 6.1 % vs. 1.1 % (P = 0.06; 95 %CI 0.001–0.36). The 15-year cancer-free and overall survival (IR vs. IAA) were 99.5 % vs 100 % (P = 0.09) and 98.9 % vs. 98.8 % (P = 0.82), respectively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 44 patients: 29 (14.7 %) in the IRA and 15 (16.3 %) in the IAA group (P = 0.72). The mean number of stools per day in the respective groups were 4.4 (2.5) vs. 5.5 (2.6) (P = 0.001). Fecal incontinence occurred in 14 patients (7.1 %) in the IRA vs. 16 (17.4 %) in the IAA group (P = 0.03).
Conclusions A combination of therapeutic endoscopic treatment and extended rectal preservation appears to be a safe alternative to ileoanal J-pouch anastomosis.
Publication History
Received: 23 February 2021
Accepted: 04 March 2021
Article published online:
17 June 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Church J, Clifford S. Practice parameters for the treatment of patients with dominantly inherited colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1001-1012
- 2 Institut national du cancer. Chirurgie prophylactique des cancers avec prédisposition génétique [Internet]. 2009 Available from: https://www.e-cancer.fr/content/download/58351/531984/file/chir_prophy_predi_gene_polypose.pdf
- 3 Iwama T, Mishima Y. Factors influencing rectum-preserving surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1024-1026
- 4 Sinha A, Tekkis PP, Rashid S. et al. Risk factors for secondary proctectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surgery 2010; 97: 1710-1715
- 5 Plateforme d'échange entre les professionnels de santé (PEPS). https://peps.sante-ra.fr
- 6 Saurin JC, Napoleon B, Gay G. et al. Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) following a colectomy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 499-501
- 7 UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009
- 8 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surgery 2004; 240: 205-213
- 9 Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97
- 10 Church J, Burke C, McGannon E. et al. Risk of rectal cancer in patients after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: a function of available surgical options. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1175-1181
- 11 Jarvinen HJ. Time and type of prophylactic surgery for familialadenomatosis coli. Ann Surgery 1985; 202: 93-97
- 12 Debinski HS, Love S, Spigelman AD. et al. Colorectal polyp counts and cancer risk in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterol 1996; 110: 1028-1030
- 13 Church JM, McGannon E, Burke C. et al. Teenagers with familial adenomatous polyposis: what is their risk for colorectal cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 887-889
- 14 Van Leerdam ME, Roos VH, Van Hooft JE. et al. Endoscopic management of polyposis syndromes: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 877-895
- 15 Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S. et al. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut 2020; 69: 411-444
- 16 Vasen HF, Van der luijt RB, Slors JF. Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis. Lancet 1996; 348: 433-435
- 17 Bülow S, Bülow C, Vasen H. et al. Colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis is still an option for selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1318-1323
- 18 Church J, Burke C, Gannon EM. et al. Predicting polyposis severity by proctoscopy: how reliable is it?. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1249-1254
- 19 Arvanitis ML, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW. et al. Mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 639-642
- 20 Vrouenraets BC, Van Duijvendijk P, Bemelman WA. et al. Adenocarcinoma in the Anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis using a double-stapled technique: report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 530-534
- 21 Duff SE, ODwyer ST, Hulten L. et al. Dysplasia in the ileoanal pouch. Colorect Dis 2002; 4: 420-429
- 22 Tonelli F, Ficari F, Bargellini T. et al. Ileal pouch adenomas and carcinomas after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 322-329
- 23 Church J. Ileoanal pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis: an underestimated threat. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1708-1713
- 24 Moussata D, Nancey S, Lapalus M. et al. Frequency and severity of ileal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 120-125
- 25 Hassan I, Chua HK, Wolff BG. et al. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2032-2037
- 26 Osterfeld N, Kadmon M, Brechtel A. et al. Preoperative and postoperative quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1324-1330
- 27 Douma KFL, Bleiker EMA, Vasen HFA. et al. Quality of life and consequences for daily life of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) family members. Colorect Dis 2010; 13: 669-677
- 28 Wolf ND, Kadmon M, Wolf RC. et al. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a matter of adjustment. Colorect Dis 2011; 13: e358-e365
- 29 Durno CA, Wong J, Berk T. et al. Quality of life and functional outcome for individuals who underwent very early colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 436-443
- 30 Van Balkom KA, Beld MP, Visschers RGJ. et al. Long-term results after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at a young age. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 939-947
- 31 Ganschow P, Pfeiffer U, Hinz U. et al. Quality of life ten and more years after restorative proctocolectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1381-1387
- 32 Andrews L, Mireskandari S, Jessen J. et al. Impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: quality of life outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1306-1315