RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-1728-9187
Hospital compound-level endoscopy training quality performance: scoping the spectrum

Abstract
Background and study aims This study aimed to assess the quality of endoscopy training in a UK Statutory Educational Body compared with Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training standards (JETS).
Methods A total of 28,298 training procedures recorded by 211 consecutive cross-specialty trainee endoscopists registered with JETS in 18 hospitals during 2019 were analyzed. Data included trainer and trainee numbers, training list frequency, procedures, direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) completion, and key performance indicators.
Results Annual median training procedures per hospital were 1395 (interquartile range (IQR) 465–2365). Median trainers and trainees per unit were 11 (6–18) and 12 (7–16), respectively, (ratio 0.8 [0.7–1.3]). Annual training list frequency per trainee was 13 (10–17), 35.0 % short of Joint Advisory Group (JAG) standard (n = 20, P = 0.001, effect size –0.56). Median points per adjusted training list were 11 (5–18). Median DOPS per trainee and trainer were three (1–6) and four (1–7) respectively; completing 0.2 DOPS (0.1–0.4) per list and amounting to six (2–12) per 200 procedures: fewer than half of the JAG standard (20 per 200) (P < 0.001, –0.61). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy median KPI: J maneuver 94 % (90–96), D2 intubation 93 % (91–96); Colonoscopy KPI: cecal intubation 82 % (72–90), polyp detection rate 25 % (18–34). Compound hospital score ranged from nine to 26 (median 17 [14–20]).
Conclusions Important performance disparity emerged with three-fold variation in compound hospital training quality and most units underperforming compared with JAG standards. Trainees and training program directors should be aware of such metrics to improve quality endoscopy educational programs and consider formal adjuncts to optimize training.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 11. März 2021
Angenommen: 12. Oktober 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. April 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Barton JR, Corbett S, Van Der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: Assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 591-597
- 2 Gupta S, Anderson J, Bhandari P. et al. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: Direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1232-1239
- 3 Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Formative DOPS: Diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (OGD). https://www.thejag.org.uk/AboutUs/DownloadCentre.aspx
- 4 Jones RP, Stylianides NA, Robertson AG. et al. National survey on endoscopy training in the UK. Ann Royal Coll Surg England 2015; 97: 386-389
- 5 Health Education England. Clinical Endoscopist Training Programme. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/endoscopy/clinical-endoscopist-training-programme
- 6 Rutter MD, Brookes M, Lee TJ. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK endoscopic activity and cancer detection: a national endoscopy database analysis. Gut 2020;
- 7 Hopkins L, Robinson D, Brown C. et al. Hospital compound level surgical training quality performance metrics: more than a score?. Bull Royal Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102: e1-e8
- 8 Clough J, Fitzpatrick M, Harvey P. et al. Shape of training review: An impact assessment for UK gastroenterology trainees. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10: 356-363
- 9 Hawkes N, Karunaratne D, Phillips A. P396 Differences in endoscopy training rates in Wales – implications in the shape of training era. Gut 2021; 70: A245
- 10 Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R. et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 2014; 63: 1746-1754
- 11 Biswas S, Alrubaiy L, China L. et al. Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BsG trainees’ national survey and strategic planning for the future. Frontline Gastroenterol 2018; 9: 200-207
- 12 Hammond JS, Watson NFS, Lund JN. et al. Surgical endoscopy training: the Joint Advisory Group on gastrointestinal endoscopy national review. Frontline Gastroenterol 2013; 4: 20-24
- 13 Patel K, Ward S, Gash K. et al. Prospective cohort study of surgical trainee experience of access to gastrointestinal endoscopy training in the UK and Ireland. Int J Surgery 2019; 63: 113-116
- 14 Malik KI, Siau K, Dunckley P. et al. Colorectal trainees in the UK struggle to meet JAG certification standards in colonoscopy by the end of their training. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21: 715-722
- 15 Ratcliffe E, Subramaniam S, Ngu WS. et al. Endoscopy training in the UK pre-COVID-19 environment: A multidisciplinary survey of endoscopy training and the experience of reciprocal feedback. Frontline Gastroenterol 2021;
- 16 Ravindran S, Bassett P, Shaw T. et al. National census of UK endoscopy services in 2019. Frontline Gastroenterol 2020; 12: 1-10
- 17 Siau K, Anderson J, Valori R. et al. Certification of UK gastrointestinal endoscopists and variations between trainee specialties: results from the JETS e-portfolio. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E551-E560
- 18 Brown C, Abdelrahman T, Patel N. et al. Operative learning curve trajectory in a cohort of surgical trainees. British Journal of Surgery 2017; 104: 1405-1411
- 19 Hawkes N, Turner J, Hurley J. et al. Accelerated training in upper GI endoscopy-an analysis of sprint programme outcomes. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2015; 3: A368-A369