Download PDF
Schmerz.Therapie 2022; 5(02): 92-98
DOI: 10.1055/a-1756-9525
Aus der Praxis

Trainingsorganisation im ambulanten Setting

Paul Szep
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Ein Trainingsprogramm für Patient*innen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen versucht, aktuelle wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse in das ambulante physiotherapeutische Praxissetting zu integrieren. Das akribisch organisierte Programm dauert neun Monate und setzt auf die Kombination von Kraft- und individuellem Ausdauertraining. Phasen mit Eigentrainings fördern die Fähigkeit zur autonomen Selbsthilfe und die Veränderung des Lebensstils.

Publication History

Article published online:
06 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. United States: University of Chicago Press; 1962
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Buchbinder R, van Tulder M, Öberg B. et al. Low back pain: a call for action. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2384-2388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D. et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2368-2383
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A. et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391(10137): 2356-2367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Zadro J, OʼKeeffe M, Maher C. Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (10) e032329
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A. et al. 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (14) 853-864
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Skou ST, Roos EM. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA : D™): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Karstens S, Krug K, Hill JC. et al. Validation of the German version of the STarT-Back Tool (STarT-G): a cohort study with patients from primary care practices. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M. et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2011; 378(9802): 1560-1571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC. et al. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (02) 102-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wick HM. Validität der Herzfrequenz zur Bestimmung des Trainingsbereiches Grundlagenausdauer 1 [Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor medicinae (Dr. med.)]. vorgelegt dem Rat der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.. Im Internet (Stand: 20.02.2022): https://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00047070/disswick.pdf
  • 12 Rassouli F, Thurnheer R. Spiroergometrie – Indikation, Durchführung und Interpretation. Swiss Med Forum 2015; 15(1415): 315-321
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G. et al. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (02) 222-226
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bohannon RW. Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2015; 18 (05) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Itoh H, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S. et al. Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6 (04) 241-245
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED. et al. Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED. et al. Movement control tests of the low back; evaluation of the difference between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 170
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T. et al. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients. Neurosci Lett 1997; 224 (01) 5-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Godde B, Stauffenberg B, Spengler F. et al. Tactile coactivation-induced changes in spatial discrimination performance. J Neurosci 2000; 20 (04) 1597-1604
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Park P, Okonkwo DO, Nguyen S. et al. Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery?. World Neurosurg 2016; 86: 168-172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Johnsen LG, Hellum C, Nygaard OP. et al. Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JC. et al. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (01) 55-65
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rusu AC, Kreddig N, Hallner D. et al. Fear of movement/(Re)injury in low back pain: confirmatory validation of a German version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B. et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important changes for the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion during cognitive behavioral rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53 (03) 351-358
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Koho P, Aho S, Kautiainen H. et al. Test-retest reliability and comparability of paper and computer questionnaires for the Finnish version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Physiotherapy 2014; 100 (04) 356-362
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wirth B, Meier N, Koch PP. et al. Entwicklung und Evaluation einer deutschen Version der Tegner Aktivitätsskala zur Erfassung der Funktion nach einer Verletzung des vorderen Kreuzbands [Development and evaluation of a German version of the Tegner activity scale for measuring outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury]. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2013; 27 (01) 21-27
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP. et al. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021; 51 (11) CPG1-CPG60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Laube W. Sensomotorik und Schmerz. Wechselwirkungen von Bewegungsreizen und Schmerzempfinden. Heildelberg: Springer; 2020
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Peters ML, Schmidt AJM. A comparison of two-point discrimination threshold of tactual, non-painful stimuli between chronic low back pain patients and controls. Pain 1991; 44 (01) 57-60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 França FR, Burke TN, Hanada ES. et al. Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain: a comparative study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010; 65 (10) 1013-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 OʼSullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Man Ther 2005; 10 (04) 242-255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bade M, Cobo-Estevez M, Neeley D. et al. Effects of manual therapy and exercise targeting the hips in patients with low-back pain-A randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2017; 23 (04) 734-740
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Shacklock M. Neurodynamics. Physiotherapy 1995; 81 (01) 9-16 Im Internet (Stand: 08.02.2022): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Shacklock/publication/269337557_Neurodynamics/links/5c28cd1892851c22a34fc060/Neurodynamics.pdf
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S. et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54 (24) 1451-1462
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Blanchard S, Glasgow P. A theoretical model to describe progressions and regressions for exercise rehabilitation. Phys Ther Sport 2014; 15 (03) 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Blanch P, Gabbett TJ. Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute : chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a playerʼs risk of subsequent injury. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (08) 471-475
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (05) 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Gabbett TJ. How Much? How Fast? How Soon? Three Simple Concepts for Progressing Training Loads to Minimize Injury Risk and Enhance Performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50 (10) 570-573
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Impellizzeri FM, Ward P, Coutts AJ. et al. Training Load and Injury Part 1: The Devil Is in the Detail-Challenges to Applying the Current Research in the Training Load and Injury Field. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50 (10) 574-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Impellizzeri FM, Ward P, Coutts AJ. et al. Training Load and Injury Part 2: Questionable Research Practices Hijack the Truth and Mislead Well-Intentioned Clinicians. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50 (10) 577-584
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D. et al. Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs. Eur J Pain 2011; 15 (08) 775.e1-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Foster J, Taylor L, Chrismas BC. et al. The influence of acetaminophen on repeated sprint cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014; 114 (01) 41-48
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Sgherza AL, Axen K, Fain R. et al. Effect of naloxone on perceived exertion and exercise capacity during maximal cycle ergometry. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2002; 93 (06) 2023-2028
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Lagally KM, Robertson RJ. Construct validity of the OMNI resistance exercise scale. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20 (02) 252-256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Gearhart Jr RF, Lagally KM, Riechman SE. et al. Strength tracking using the OMNI resistance exercise scale in older men and women. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23 (03) 1011-1015
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J. et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (02) 333-341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Naclerio F, Rodríguez-Romo G, Barriopedro-Moro MI. et al. Control of resistance training intensity by the OMNI perceived exertion scale. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25 (07) 1879-1888
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Steele J. Intensity; in-ten-si-ty; noun. 1. Often used ambiguously within resistance training. 2. Is it time to drop the term altogether?. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48 (22) 1586-1588
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C. et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar