PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2022; 10(04): E448-E458
DOI: 10.1055/a-1765-4035
Review

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anand Kumar
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States
,
Saurabh Chandan
3   Division of Gastroenterology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
,
Babu P. Mohan
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
Pradeep R. Atla
5   Palmdale Regional Medical Center, Palmdale, California, United States
,
Evin J. McCabe
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States
,
David H. Robbins
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States
,
Arvind J. Trindade
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States
6   Division of Gastroenterology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, United States
,
Petros C. Benias
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States
2   Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States
6   Division of Gastroenterology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE) has been the mainstay treatment for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The emergence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) presents a less invasive alternative for palliation of GOO. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of EUS-GE compared to SGE.

Methods Multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings up to April 2021 were searched to identify studies that reported on safety and effectiveness of EUS-GE in comparison to SGE. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AE) and recurrence, and pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of procedure time and post-procedure length of stay (LOS) were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Cochran Q statistics.

Results Seven studies including 625 patients (372 EUS-GE and 253 SGE) were included. EUS-GE had lower pooled odds of technical success compared with SGE (OR 0.19, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.06–0.60, I 2 0 %). Among the technically successful cases, EUS-GE was superior in terms of clinical success (OR 4.73, 95 % CI 1.83–12.25, I 2 18 %), lower overall AE (OR 0.20, 95 % CI 0.10–0.37, I 2 39 %), and shorter procedure time (SMD –2.4, 95 % CI –4.1, –0.75, I 2 95 %) and post-procedure LOS (SMD –0.49, 95 % CI –0.94, –0.03, I 2 78%). Rates of severe AE (0.89, 95 % CI 0.11–7.36, I 2 67 %) and recurrence (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.18–1.38, I 2 49 %) were comparable.

Conclusions Our results suggest EUS-GE is a promising alternative to SGE due to its superior clinical success, overall safety, and efficiency. With further evolution EUS-GE could become the intervention of choice in GOO.

Supplementary material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Juli 2021

Angenommen nach Revision: 25. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. April 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Chowdhury A, Dhali GK, Banerjee PK. Etiology of gastric outlet obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1679
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Johnson CD. Gastric outlet obstruction malignant until proved otherwise. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 1740
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Takeno A, Takiguchi S, Fujita J. et al. Clinical outcome and indications for palliative gastrojejunostomy in unresectable advanced gastric cancer: multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3527-3533
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bahra M, Jacob D. Surgical palliation of advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2008; 177: 111-120
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Khashab M, Alawad AS, Shin EJ. et al. Enteral stenting versus gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2068-2075
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, van Hooft JE. et al. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 490-499
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Storm AC, Ryou M. Advances in the endoscopic management of gastric outflow disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33: 455-460
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 No JH, Kim SW, Lim CH. et al. Long-term outcome of palliative therapy for gastric outlet obstruction caused by unresectable gastric cancer in patients with good performance status: endoscopic stenting versus surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Itoi T, Baron TH, Khashab MA. et al. Technical review of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy in 2017. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 495-502
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Khashab MA, Baron TH, Binmoeller KF. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: a new promising technique in evolution. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1234-1236
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Binmoeller KF, Shah JN. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using novel tools designed for transluminal therapy: a porcine study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 499-503
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tyberg A, Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocana R. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a multicenter, international experience. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E276-E281
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Irani S, Baron TH, Itoi T. et al. Endoscopic gastroenterostomy: techniques and review. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33: 320-329
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Carbajo AY, Kahaleh M, Tyberg A. Clinical review of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kerdsirichairat T, Irani S, Yang J. et al. Durability and long-term outcomes of direct EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents for gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E144-E50
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 16-23
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Itoi T, Ishii K, Ikeuchi N. et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (EPASS) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gut 2016; 65: 193-195
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Grimm IS. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 932-938
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2946-2952
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Chandan S, Khan SR, Mohan BP. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E496-E504
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Itoi T, Itokawa F, Uraoka T. et al. Novel EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy technique using a new double-balloon enteric tube and lumen-apposing metal stent (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 934-939
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bondi G, Bazarbashi AN, Abbas AM. et al. Su1269 Endoscopic gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a retrospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: AB303
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Widmer JL, Winner M, Allendorf J. et al. Su1154 Single center comparative study of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: AB291
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Marya N, Jaruvongvanich V, Abu Dayyeh BK. et al. Su1268 A multicenter international study comparing clinical outcomes of eus-guided gastrojejunostomy, surgical gastrojejunostomy, and enteral stenting for patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: AB302-AB303
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Khashab MA, Bukhari M, Baron TH. et al. International multicenter comparative trial of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E275-E81
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Perez-Miranda M, Tyberg A, Poletto D. et al. EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy: an international collaborative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 51: 896-899
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kouanda A, Binmoeller K, Hamerski C. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus open surgical gastrojejunostomy: clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 7058-7067
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bronswijk M, Vanella G, van Malenstein H. et al. Laparoscopic versus EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: an international multicenter propensity score-matched comparison (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 526-536.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. for the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. A Proposal for Reporting. . JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009; 172: 137-159
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Wan X, Wang W, Liu J. et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 135
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Higgins JP, White IR, Wood AM. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Trials 2008; 5: 225-239
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A. et al. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 7-10
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2 ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Bronswijk M, Vanella G, Van Malenstein H. et al. VDM. Laparoscopic or EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: A propensity score matched analysis. United Europ Gastroenterol J 2020; 8: 804-805
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Xu G, Shen Y, Lv Y. et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using double balloon occlusion methods: a clinical retrospective study in 36 patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1690-E1697
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kastelijn JB, Moons LMG, Garcia-Alonso FJ. et al. Patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1194-E201
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Amateau SK, Lim CH, McDonald NM. et al. EUS-guided endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis with lumen-apposing metal stent: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 1445-1451
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Kerdsirichairat T, Yang J, Gutierrez OIB. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents for gastric outlet obstruction: A 4-year cohort. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: AB320-AB1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Ge PS, Young JY, Dong W. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 3404-3411
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Iqbal U, Berger A, Confer B. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy vs. enteral stenting for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective review: 918. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114: S536-S537
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Sanchez-Aldehuelo R, de Santiago ER. et al. Su1286 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy is superior to duodenal self expandable metal stent for pallitaive treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstructtion: a comparative case control study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: AB312-AB313
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Larghi A, Ibrahim M, Fuccio L. et al. Forward-viewing echoendoscope versus standard echoendoscope for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid lesions: a randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2019; 515: 444-451
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar