Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1793-9414
Improved detection of early gastric cancer with linked color imaging using an ultrathin endoscope: a video-based analysis
Abstract
Background and study aims Ultrathin endoscopy causes a minimal gag reflex and has minimal effects on cardiopulmonary function. Linked color imaging (LCI) is useful for detection of malignancies in the digestive tract. The aim of this study was to clarify whether LCI with ultrathin endoscopy facilitates detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) despite its lower resolution compared with high-resolution white light imaging (WLI) with standard endoscopy.
Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis with prospectively collected video, including consecutive 166 cases of EGC or gastric atrophy alone. Ninety seconds of screening video was collected using standard and ultrathin endoscopes with both WLI and LCI for each case. Three expert endoscopists assessed each video and the sensitivity of detecting EGC calculated. Color difference calculations were performed.
Results Sensitivities using ultrathin WLI, ultrathin LCI, standard WLI, and standard LCI for the identification of cancer were 66.0 %, 80.3 %, 69.9 %, and 84.0 %, respectively. The color difference between malignant lesions and surrounding mucosa with ultrathin LCI and standard LCI were significantly higher than using ultrathin WLI or standard WLI, supported subjectively by the visibility score. Ultrathin LCI color difference and visibility score were significantly higher than standard WLI.
Conclusions LCI with a low-resolution ultrathin endoscope is superior to WLI with a high-resolution standard endoscope for gastric cancer screening. This suggests that the high color contrast between EGC and the surrounding mucosa is more important than high-resolution images.
Publication History
Received: 30 August 2021
Accepted after revision: 20 December 2021
Article published online:
13 May 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Yagi J, Adachi K, Arima N. et al. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1226-1231
- 2 Murata A, Akahoshi K, Sumida Y. et al. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 482-485
- 3 Garcia RT, Cello JP, Nguyen MH. et al. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1606-1612
- 4 Thota PN, Zuccaro GJr, Vargo 2nd JJ. et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 559-565
- 5 Preiss C, Charton JP, Schumacher B. et al. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 641-646
- 6 Mori A, Ohashi N, Tatebe H. et al. Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 38-44
- 7 Mori A, Ohashi N, Maruyama T. et al. Cardiovascular tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an ultrathin scope: prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and transoral procedures. Digest Endosc 2008; 20: 79-83
- 8 Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T. et al. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Digest Endosc 2009; 21: 141-146
- 9 Toyoizumi H, Kaise M, Arakawa H. et al. Ultrathin endoscopy versus high-resolution endoscopy for diagnosing superficial gastric neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 240-245
- 10 Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R. et al. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 279-284
- 11 Faulx AL, Catanzaro A, Zyzanski S. et al. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 620-623
- 12 Birkner B, Fritz N, Schatke W. et al. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 647-651
- 13 Yoshida Y, Hayami Y, Matuoka M. et al. Comparison of endoscopic detection rate of early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma using transnasal egd with that of transoral EGD. Digest Endosc 2008; 20: 184-189
- 14 Ono S, Kawada K, Dohi O. et al. Linked color imaging focused on neoplasm detection in the upper gastrointestinal tract : a randomized trial. Ann Internal Med 2021; 174: 18-24
- 15 Gotoda T, Uedo N, Yoshinaga S. et al. Basic principles and practice of gastric cancer screening using high-definition white-light gastroscopy: Eyes can only see what the brain knows. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 2-15
- 16 Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T. et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E518-E525
- 17 Kanzaki H, Takenaka R, Kawahara Y. et al. Linked color imaging (LCI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technology, emphasizes the color of early gastric cancer. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E1005-e1013
- 18 Fukuda H, Miura Y, Osawa H. et al. Linked color imaging can enhance recognition of early gastric cancer by high color contrast to surrounding gastric intestinal metaplasia. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 396-406
- 19 Takeda T, Nagahara A, Ishizuka K. et al. Improved Visibility of barrett’s esophagus with linked color imaging: inter- and intra-rater reliability and quantitative analysis. Digestion 2018; 97: 183-194
- 20 Pierre SA, Ferrandino MN, Simmons WN. et al. High definition laparoscopy: objective assessment of performance characteristics and comparison with standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 2009; 23: 523-528
- 21 Yabe H. Magnifying ratio and resolution of electronic endoscopes. Digest Endosc 2002; 14: S88-S90
- 22 Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Miura Y. et al. Diagnosis of depressed-type early gastric cancer using small-caliber endoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. Digest Endosc 2012; 24: 231-236
- 23 Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Yamada N. et al. Diagnosis of endoscopic Barrett's esophagus by transnasal flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1125-1132
- 24 Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Miura Y. et al. Blue laser imaging provides excellent endoscopic images of upper gastrointestinal lesions. Video J Encycloped GI Endosc 2014; 1: 607-610
- 25 Osawa H, Miura Y, Takezawa T. et al. Linked color imaging and blue laser imaging for upper gastrointestinal screening. Clin Endosc 2018; 51: 513-526
- 26 Chen HN, Wang Z, Li X. et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication cannot reduce the risk of gastric cancer in patients with intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia: evidence from a meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 2016; 19: 166-175
- 27 Saka A, Yagi K, Nimura S. Endoscopic and histological features of gastric cancers after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Gastric Cancer 2016; 19: 524-530
- 28 Takahashi H, Miura Y, Osawa H. et al. Blue laser imaging with a small-caliber endoscope facilitates detection of early gastric cancer. Clin Endosc 2019; 52: 273-277
- 29 Toma S, Osawa H, Yoshizawa M. et al. Diagnosis of small flat early gastric cancer by flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. Clin J Gastroenterol 2010; 3: 88-91