Download PDF
Gastroenterologie up2date 2022; 18(04): 349-366
DOI: 10.1055/a-1810-5534
Wichtige Methoden in der Gastroenterologie

Elastografie: Stellenwert im Gastrointestinaltrakt

Christiana Graf
,
Mireen Friedrich-Rust
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Nichtinvasive elastografische Verfahren haben in den letzten Jahren in der klinischen Praxis insbesondere in der Detektion der Leberfibrose und der Leberzirrhose, aber auch in der Einschätzung des Leberfettgehalts bei der nicht alkoholischen Fettlebererkrankung (NAFLD) an Bedeutung gewonnen. Der Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung und den Stellenwert der nichtinvasiven Verfahren in der Gastroenterologie.
Kernaussagen

  • Verschiedene nichtinvasive elastografische Verfahren (nichtinvasive Tests, NIT) wurden zur Beurteilung des Fibrosestadiums entwickelt, die im klinischen Alltag, insbesondere in der Detektion von Leberfibrose und -zirrhose, an Bedeutung gewonnen, die klinische Praxis in der Hepatologie verändert und damit den Stellenwert der Leberbiopsie als Goldstandard in den Hintergrund gerückt haben.

  • Die am besten validierte nichtinvasive Methode stellt die vibrationsgesteuerte transiente Elastografie (TE) dar, welche die Möglichkeit bietet, die Steifigkeit des Lebergewebes (Liver-Stiffness Measurement, LSM) zu bestimmen und so einen Rückschluss auf die Fibrose erlaubt.

  • Neben kombinierten serologischen Fibrosemarkern kommen zunehmend auch Elastografieverfahren zum Einsatz, um Patienten mit fortgeschrittener Fibrose einer NASH (nicht alkoholische Steatohepatitis) zu erkennen.

  • Der Einsatz von nichtinvasiven Tests bei Patienten mit alkoholbedingten Leberschäden ist sinnvoll und attraktiv, da eine frühzeitige Erkennung der Krankheit zu einer Verringerung des Alkoholkonsums führen und dadurch das Fortschreiten der Erkrankung unterbrechen könnte.

  • Liver-Stiffness Measurement (LSM) mittels transienter Elastografie ist nach wie vor das am besten validierte Instrument zur Diagnose und zum Ausschluss einer fortgeschrittenen Fibrose und Leberzirrhose sowie zur Detektion einer portalen Hypertension.

  • Die prognostische Bedeutung der transienten Elastografie ist inzwischen für zahlreiche Lebererkrankungen – chronische HBV, chronische HCV, HCV/HIV-Koinfektion, primär sklerosierende Cholangitis (PSC), primär biliäre Cholangitis (PBC), NAFLD (nicht alkoholische Fettlebererkrankung) – sowie gemischte Kollektive mit chronischen Lebererkrankungen belegt. Die Elastografie ist hierbei der Leberbiopsie überlegen und ermöglicht gerade bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose eine weitere Risikostratifizierung.

Schlüsselwörter

transiente Elastografie - nichtinvasiver Test - nicht alkoholische Fettlebererkrankung - Leberzirrhose


Publication History

Article published online:
12 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (07) 495-500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A. et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2005; 128 (07) 1898-1906
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Davison BA, Harrison SA, Cotter G. et al. Suboptimal reliability of liver biopsy evaluation has implications for randomized clinical trials. J Hepatol 2020; 73 (06) 1322-1332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mehta SH, Lau B, Afdhal NH. et al. Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers. J Hepatol 2009; 50 (01) 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Berzigotti A, Tsochatzis E, Boursier J. et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis – 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021; 75 (03) 659-689
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Petta S, Maida M, Macaluso FS. et al. The severity of steatosis influences liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2015; 62 (04) 1101-1110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Tapper EB, Challies T, Nasser I. et al. The performance of vibration controlled transient elastography in a US cohort of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111 (05) 677-684
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wong VWS, Vergniol J, Wong GLH. et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010; 51 (02) 454-462
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castéra L. et al. Quantitative elastography methods in liver disease: current evidence and future directions. Radiology 2018; 286 (03) 738-763
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Oshiro H. et al. The role of multiparametric us of the liver for the evaluation of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Radiology 2020; 296 (03) 532-540
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jiang W, Huang S, Teng H. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point shear wave elastography and transient elastography for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8 (08) e021787
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Roeb E, Steffen HM, Bantel H. et al. S2k-Leitlinie nicht alkoholische Fettlebererkrankung. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53 (07) 668-723
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Roeb E, Canbay A, Bantel H. et al. Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie nicht alkoholische Fettlebererkrankung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – 2022 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–025. Z Gastroenterol 2022; 60 (09) 1346-1421
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D. et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016; 64 (01) 73-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S. et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol 2010; 52 (02) 206-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Barthe C. et al. Non-invasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year survival of patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37 (10) 979-988
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Millonig G, Reimann FM, Friedrich S. et al. Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis. Hepatology 2008; 48 (05) 1718-1723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Trabut JB, Thepot V, Nalpas B. et al. Rapid decline of liver stiffness following alcohol withdrawal in heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012; 36: 1407-1411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Mederacke I, Wursthorn K, Kirschner J. et al. Food intake increases liver stiffness in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int 2009; 29 (10) 1500-1506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bonder A, Tapper EB, Afdhal NH. Contemporary assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Clin Liver Dis 2015; 19 (01) 123-134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR. et al. Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease – MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36 (01) 22-29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Roeb E, Geier A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) – current treatment recommendations and future developments. Z Gastroenterol 2019; 57 (04) 508-517
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Xiao G, Zhu S, Xiao X. et al. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Hepatology 2017; 66 (05) 1486-1501
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Eddowes PJ, Sasso M, Allison M. et al. Accuracy of fibroscan controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2019; 156 (06) 1717-1730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Vuppalanchi R, Siddiqui MS, Van Natta ML. et al. Performance characteristics of vibration-controlled transient elastography for evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2018; 67 (01) 134-144
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive assessment of liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2019; 156 (05) 1264-1281.e4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Herrmann E, de Lédinghen V, Cassinotto C. et al. Assessment of biopsy-proven liver fibrosis by two-dimensional shear wave elastography: An individual patient data-based meta-analysis. Hepatology 2018; 67 (01) 260-272
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hsu C, Caussy C, Imajo K. et al. Magnetic Resonance vs. Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17 (04) 630-637.e8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Labenz C, Huber Y, Michel M. et al. Impact of NAFLD on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases in a Primary Care Population in Germany. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 65: 2112-2119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016; 64 (06) 1388-1402
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Bril F, Ortiz-Lopez C, Lomonaco R. et al. Clinical value of liver ultrasound for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in overweight and obese patients. Liver Int 2015; 35 (09) 2139-2146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. Im Internet (Stand: 27.10.2022): https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241565639
    PubMed
  • 33 Kim D, Adejumo AC, Yoo ER. et al. Trends in mortality from extrahepatic complications in patients with chronic liver disease, from 2007 through 2017. Gastroenterology 2019; 157 (04) 1055-1066.e11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ratib S, Fleming KM, Crooks CJ. et al. 1 and 5 year survival estimates for people with cirrhosis of the liver in England, 1998–2009: a large population study. J Hepatol 2014; 60 (02) 282-289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of alcohol-related liver disease. J Hepatol 2018; 69 (01) 154-181
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mueller S, Englert S, Seitz HK. et al. Inflammation-adapted liver stiffness values for improved fibrosis staging in patients with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic liver disease. Liver Int 2015; 35 (12) 2514-2521
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Thiele M, Detlefsen S, Sevelsted Møller L. et al. Transient and 2-Dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography Provide Comparable Assessment of Alcoholic Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2016; 150 (01) 123-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Voican CS, Louvet A, Trabut JB. et al. Transient elastography alone and in combination with FibroTest® for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease. Liver Int 2017; 37 (11) 1697-1705
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Nguyen-Khac E, Thiele M, Voican C. et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with alcohol-related liver disease by transient elastography: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3 (09) 614-625
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Nguyen HH, Shaheen AA, Baeza N. et al. Evaluation of classical and novel autoantibodies for the diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis-Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndrome (PBC-AIH OS). PLoS One 2018; 13 (03) e0193960
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Pavlov CS, Casazza G, Nikolova D. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography for staging of fibrosis in people with alcoholic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43 (05) 575-585
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Papatheodoridi M, Hiriart JB, Lupsor-Platon M. et al. Refining the Baveno VI elastography criteria for the definition of compensated advanced chronic liver disease. J Hepatol 2021; 74 (05) 1109-1116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Mueller S, Millonig G, Sarovska L. et al. Increased liver stiffness in alcoholic liver disease: differentiating fibrosis from steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16 (08) 966-972
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Gianni E, Forte P, Galli V. et al. Prospective Evaluation of Liver Stiffness Using Transient Elastography in Alcoholic Patients Following Abstinence. Alcohol Alcohol 2017; 52 (01) 42-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Gelsi E, Dainese R, Truchi R. et al. Effect of detoxification on liver stiffness assessed by Fibroscan® in alcoholic patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011; 35 (03) 566-570
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 DʼAmbrosio R, Aghemo A, Rumi MG. et al. A morphometric and immunohistochemical study to assess the benefit of a sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2012; 56 (02) 532-543
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Singh S, Facciorusso A, Loomba R. et al. Magnitude and kinetics of decrease in liver stiffness after antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16 (01) 27-38.e4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 DʼAmbrosio R, Aghemo A, Fraquelli M. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan for cirrhosis is influenced by liver morphometry in HCV patients with a sustained virological response. J Hepatol 2013; 59 (02) 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Pan JJ, Bao F, Du E. et al. Morphometry confirms fibrosis regression from sustained virologic response to direct‐acting antivirals for hepatitis C. Hepatol Commun 2018; 2 (11) 1320-1330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Chon YE, Choi EH, Song KJ. et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7 (09) e44930
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S. et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2008; 134 (04) 960-974
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34 (02) 169-184
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 European Association for Study of Liver, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado. EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 2015; 63 (01) 237-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Kim MN, Kim SU, Kim BK. et al. Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients with transient elastography-defined subclinical cirrhosis. Hepatology 2015; 61 (06) 1851-1859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Lin Y, Lin H, Jin C. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in non-viral liver diseases using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15 (01) e0227358
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 de Franchis R. Baveno Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63 (03) 743-752
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Shi KQ, Fan YC, Pan ZZ. et al. Transient elastography: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in evaluation of portal hypertension in chronic liver disease. Liver Int 2013; 33 (01) 62-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Singh S, Eaton JE, Murad MH. et al. Accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement in detection of esophageal varices in patients with chronic liver disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12 (06) 935-945.e4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Kim BK, Kim DY, Han KH. et al. Risk assessment of esophageal variceal bleeding in B-viral liver cirrhosis by a liver stiffness measurement-based model. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106 (09) 1654-1662 1730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Singh S, Fujii LL, Murad MH. et al. Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11 (12) 1573-1584.e1–2 quiz e88–89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Corpechot C, Gaouar F, El Naggar A. et al. Baseline values and changes in liver stiffness measured by transient elastography are associated with severity of fibrosis and outcomes of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 2014; 146 (04) 970-979 quiz e15–e16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Vergniol J, Foucher J, Terrebonne E. et al. Noninvasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2011; 140 (07) 1970-1979 1979.e1–e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Vergniol J, Boursier J, Coutzac C. et al. Evolution of noninvasive tests of liver fibrosis is associated with prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2014; 60 (01) 65-76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Boursier J, Hagström H, Ekstedt M. et al. Non-invasive tests accurately stratify patients with NAFLD based on their risk of liver-related events. J Hepatol 2022; 76 (05) 1013-1020
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Colecchia A, Colli A, Casazza G. et al. Spleen stiffness measurement can predict clinical complications in compensated HCV-related cirrhosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2014; 60 (06) 1158-1164
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Elkrief L, Rautou PE, Ronot M. et al. Prospective comparison of spleen and liver stiffness by using shear-wave and transient elastography for detection of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Radiology 2015; 275 (02) 589-598
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 2011; 54 (03) 1082-1090
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Jun BG, Park WY, Park EJ. et al. A prospective comparative assessment of the accuracy of the FibroScan in evaluating liver steatosis. PLoS One 2017; 12 (08) e0182784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Castéra L, Vergniol J, Foucher J. et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2005; 128 (02) 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Arena U, Vizzutti F, Abraldes JG. et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gut 2008; 57 (09) 1288-1293
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A. et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005; 41 (01) 48-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Corpechot C, El Naggar A, Poujol-Robert A. et al. Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and PSC. Hepatology 2006; 43 (05) 1118-1124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Corpechot C, Carrat F, Poujol-Robert A. et al. Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2012; 56 (01) 198-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Rouze NC. et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using acoustic radiation force-based shear stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2011; 55 (03) 666-672
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Goertz RS, Zopf Y, Jugl V. et al. Measurement of liver elasticity with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology: an alternative noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31 (02) 151-155
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R. et al. Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15 (44) 5525-5532
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B. et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology 2012; 56 (06) 2125-2133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar