Download PDF
Rofo 2022; 194(12): 1322-1332
DOI: 10.1055/a-1853-7443
Review

Concepts in the Establishment of Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Centers: The Role of Radiology

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Dirk Andre Clevert
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Grosshadern, Klinikum der Universität München Großhadern, München, Germany
,
Ernst Michael Jung
2   Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Germany
,
Marc-André Weber 
3   Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Rostock, Germany
,
Markus Herbert Lerchbaumer 
4   Department of Radiology, ChariteCentrum 6 Diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
,
Winfried Willinek
5   3. Center for Radiology, Neuroradiology, Sonography and Nuclear Medicine, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brueder, Trier, Germany
6   Radiology, University of Bonn, Germany
,
Thomas Fischer
4   Department of Radiology, ChariteCentrum 6 Diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Ultrasound (US) is widely used as a fast and cost-efficient first-choice imaging technique without relevant side effects for a variety of diagnostic tasks. Due to technical advances, more complex and sophisticated methods such as color-coded duplex ultrasound, image fusion, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and ultrasound-guided interventions have become increasingly important in diagnostic algorithms.

Method This study presents an overview of all aspects regarding the establishing of an interdisciplinary US center based on five representative examples in Germany. These aspects include topics of ultrasound education, research, economics, and administration.

Results The goal of an interdisciplinary US center is to bundle the use of equipment, staff, rooms, and infrastructure resources (optimization of equipment availability and use of new techniques) to expand the range of examinations, to promote resident training, and to boost continuing medical education of residents. This should result in better patient care and has additionally improved patient care while considering the added value for the participating institutions involved. Interdisciplinary US centers allow a reduction of the number of US devices needed in a hospital and more efficient use of available equipment through bedside time optimization by central organization within interdisciplinary management. The focused application of special US techniques such as CEUS or image fusion for complex, difficult interventions as well as the training and education of younger colleagues in using these techniques is centrally organized by experts and can be improved through the multidisciplinary experience available.

Conclusion Organizational structures, sharing of materials, and standardization of diagnostic reports facilitate and accelerate cooperation with the referring specialty.

Key Points: 

  • Interdisciplinary US centers foster clinical collaboration, research, and jointly organized, standardized training.

  • Economic aspects include optimization of available equipment, use of the latest US techniques, and centralization of organizational structures.

  • Common terminology and standardized reporting increase the satisfaction of referring doctors

Citation Format

  • Clevert DA, Jung EM, Weber M et al. Concepts in the Establishment of Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Centers: The Role of Radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1322 – 1332

Key words

education - ultrasound - economics - medical


Publication History

Received: 23 May 2021

Accepted: 12 April 2022

Article published online:
18 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Schnur S. Rationelle Ultraschalldiagnostik Grundlagen und problemorientierte Anwendung. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2001
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Clevert DA, Paprottka PM, Helck A. et al. Image fusion in the management of thermal tumor ablation of the liver. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc 2012; 52: 205-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Trottmann M, Marcon J, D’anastasi M. et al. The role of VTIQ as a new tissue strain analytics measurement technique in testicular lesions. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc 2014; 58: 195-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Durmus T. et al. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients with Suspicion for Prostate Cancer. Urology 2015; 86: 108-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lerchbaumer MH, Auer TA, Marticorena GS. et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in testicular pathologies: Single-center results. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc 2019; 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clevert DA, Paprottka P, Sommer WH. et al. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Imaging Carotid Arterial Diseases. Semin. Ultrasound, CT MRI 2013; 34: 204-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gürtler VM, Sommer WH, Meimarakis G. et al. A comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and multislice computed tomography in detecting and classifying endoleaks in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg 2013; 58: 340-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sommer WH, Becker CR, Haack M. et al. Time-resolved CT angiography for the detection and classification of endoleaks. Radiology 2012; 263: 917-926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fischer C, Krix M, Weber MA. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Musculoskeletal Applications: A World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Position Paper. Ultrasound Med. Biol 2020; 46: 1279-1295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sidhu PS. Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) Imaging: Terminology Describing the Many Aspects of Ultrasonography. Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: 315-317
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Weber MA, Delorme S. Sonografische Weiterbildung auf dem Weg zum radiologischen Facharzt: Konzepte und Herausforderungen. Radiologe 2017; 57: 967-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sidhu P, Cantisani V, Dietrich C. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Der Medizin – Eur. J. Ultrasound 2018; 39: e2-e44
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Müller T, Martiny H, Merz E. et al. DEGUM recommendations on infection prevention in ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2018; 39: 284-303
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schuler A, Karbe T, Vasilakis D. et al. Primär Ultraschall als Bildgebung in der Notaufnahme. Endergebnisse der PRIMUS-Studie (DEGUM Multicenter-Studie). Ultraschall Der Medizin – Eur. J. Ultrasound 2012; 33: A901
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Westwood M, Joore M, Grutters J. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue(R) (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver m. Health Technol. Assess 2013; 17: 1-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rice JA, Brewer J, Speaks T. et al. The POCUS Consult: How Point of Care Ultrasound Helps Guide Medical Decision Making. Int. J. Gen. Med 2021; 14: 9789-9806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wüstner M, Mertiny E, Busch HP. Arbeitsweise eines interdisziplinären Ultraschallzentrums - Ein neuer Weg zu professioneller Ultraschalldiagnostik. Klinikarzt 2012; 41: 47-51
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sǎftoiu A, Gilja OH, Sidhu PS. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Elastography in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2018. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2019; 40: 425-453
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Osterwalder J, Mathis G, Hoffmann B. New Perspectives for Modern Trauma Management – Lessons Learned from 25 Years FAST and 15 Years E-FAST. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2019; 40: 560-583
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Østergaard ML, Rue Nielsen K, Albrecht-Beste E. et al. Simulator training improves ultrasound scanning performance on patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur. Radiol 2019; 29: 3210-3218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ertl-Wagner B, Barkhausen J, Mahnken A. et al. White Paper: Radiological Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Education in Germany. RoFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgeb. Verfahren 2016; 188: 1017-1023
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Klotz LV, Gürkov R, Eichhorn ME. et al. Perfusion characteristics of parotid gland tumors evaluated bycontrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur. J. Radiol 2013; 82: 2227-2232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fischer T, Thomas A, Tardy I. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-specific microbubbles for molecular ultrasound detection of prostate cancer in a rat model. Invest. Radiol 2010; 45: 675-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nikolaou K, Cyran CC, Lauber K. et al. Präklinische Bildgebung im Tiermodell bei strahlentherapie. Radiologe 2012; 52: 252-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tzschätzsch H, Ipek-Ugay S, Nguyen Trong M. et al. Multifrequency time-harmonic elastography for the measurement of liver viscoelasticity in large tissue windows. Ultrasound Med. Biol 2015; 41: 724-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Durmus T, Stöckel J, Slowinski T. et al. The hyperechoic zone around breast lesions – An indirect parameter of malignancy. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2014; 35: 547-553
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fischer T, Grigoryev M, Bossenz S. et al. Sonografische Mikrokalkdetektion – Potenzial einer neuen Methode. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2012; 33: 357-365
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maxeiner A, Fischer T, Schwabe J. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Quantitative Perfusion Analysis in Patients with Suspicion for Prostate Cancer. Ultraschall Der Medizin – Eur. J. Ultrasound 2019; 40: 340-348
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Busch H. Kosteneffizienz eines modernen Imaging Centers. RöFo – Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Röntgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgeb. Verfahren 2013; 185: RKSP307_2
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar