Subepithelial tumors: How does endoscopic full-thickness resection & submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection compare with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery?

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic techniques are rapidly emerging for resection of subepithelial tumors (SETs). Submucosal tunneling for endoscopic resection (STER), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) are current alternatives to open surgery. In this study, we aimed to compare the three endoscopic techniques.

Patients and methods Consecutive patients who underwent resection of a submucosal esophageal or gastric lesion at several tertiary care centers were included in a dedicated registry over 3 years. Demographics, size and location of resected lesion, histology of specimen, length of procedure, adverse events (AEs), duration of hospital stay, and follow-up data were collected.

Results Ninety-six patients were included (47.7 % male, mean age 62): STER n = 34, EFTR n = 34, LECS n = 280. The lesions included leiomyoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and other. The mean lesion size was 28 mm (STD 16, range 20–72 mm). The majority of lesions in the EFTR and laparoscopic-assisted resection group were GISTs. There was no significant difference in clear resection margins, post-procedure complication rates, recurrence rate and total follow-up duration between the groups. However, the LECS group had a procedure time at least 30 minutes longer than STER or EFTR (P < 0.01). Total hospital stay for the laparoscopic-assisted resection group was also longer when compared to STER (1.5) and EFTR (1.8) (P < 0.01).

Conclusions STER, EFTR, and laparoscopic-assisted resection are efficacious approaches for resection of SETs with similar R0 resection rates, complication rates, and AE rates. Laparoscopic assisted resection appears more time-consuming and is associated with a longer hospital stay.

• References

• 1 Yuyong TanJH, Deliang Liu. Current status of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (Review). Oncology Letters 2017; 14: 5085-5090
• 2 Faulx AL, Kothari S, Acosta RD. et al. The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 1117-1132
• 3 Polkowski M. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 635-645
• 4 Chak A, Canto MI, Rosch T. et al. Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 468-473
• 5 Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C. et al. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut 2000; 46: 88-92
• 6 Kawamoto K, Yamada Y, Utsunomiya T. et al. Gastrointestinal submucosal tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US. Radiology 1997; 205: 733-740
• 7 Toshirou N, Naoki K, Shinjiro Y. et al. Submucosal tumors: Comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Digestive Endoscopy 2013; 25: 479-489
• 8 Xu MD, Cai MY, Zhou PH. et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: a new technique for treating upper GI submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 195-199
• 9 Lu J, Zheng M, Jiao T. et al. Transcardiac tunneling technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus tumors arising from the muscularis propria. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 888-892
• 10 Li QL, Chen WF, Zhang C. et al. Clinical impact of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with video). Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3640-3646
• 11 Wang H, Tan Y, Zhou Y. et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27: 776-780
• 12 Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2926-2931
• 13 Tan Y, Tang X, Guo T. et al. Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3376-3382
• 14 Zhou DJ, Dai ZB, Wells MM. et al. Submucosal tunneling and endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors at the esophagogastric junction. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 578-583
• 15 Huang LY, Cui J, Lin SJ. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors arising from the muscularis propria layer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 13981-13986
• 16 Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection with defect closure using an over-the-scope clip for gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3356-3362
• 17 Chiu PWY, Phee SJ, Wang Z. et al. Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by overstitch: a preclinical study. Surgical Endoscopy 2014; 28: 319-324
• 18 Shi Q, Chen T, Zhong YS. et al. Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 329-334
• 19 Schlag C, Wilhelm D, von Delius S. et al. EndoResect study: endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric subepithelial tumors. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 4-11
• 20 Hiki N, Nunobe S. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for the gastrointestinal tract: Updated indications. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3: 239-246
• 21 Cai MY, Carreras-Presas Martin F, Zhou PH. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 17-24
• 22 Zhang X, Modayil R, Criscitelli T. et al. Endoscopic resection for subepithelial lesions-pure endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4: 39
• 23 Wang L, Ren W, Fan CQ. et al. Full-thickness endoscopic resection of nonintracavitary gastric stromal tumors: a novel approach. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 641-647
• 24 Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T. et al. Submucosal endoscopic tumor resection for subepithelial tumors in the esophagus and cardia. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 225-230
• 25 Wang L, Ren W, Zhang Z. et al. Retrospective study of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for surgical resection of esophageal leiomyoma. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4259-4266
• 26 Chen T, Zhang C, Yao LQ. et al. Management of the complications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 149-155
• 27 Ye LP, Zhang Y, Mao XL. et al. Submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection for the treatment of esophageal submucosal tumours originating from the muscularis propria layer: an analysis of 15 cases. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 119-123
• 28 Tang X, Ren Y, Huang S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study. Gut Liver 2017; 11: 620-627
• 29 Tan Y, Lv L, Duan T. et al. Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for large esophageal leiomyoma originating from the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 3121-3127