Endoscopy training in the Netherlands: a national survey among gastroenterology residents

Abstract

Background and study aims Training in endoscopy is a key objective of gastroenterology residency. There is currently no standardized or systematic training approach. This study evaluated and compared the current status of gastrointestinal endoscopy training programs in all teaching hospitals in the Netherlands from a resident perspective.

Materials and methods A national online survey with open and closed questions on gastrointestinal endoscopy training was administered to all gastroenterology residents (N = 180) in the eight educational regions in the Netherlands.

Results One hundred residents who had already started endoscopy training were included in the analyses. Sixty-five residents (65 %) were satisfied with their endoscopy training program. Participation in a preclinical endoscopy course was mandatory in seven of eight educational regions. Residents from the region without a mandatory endoscopy training course were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their endoscopy training program (32 %, P = .011). Criteria used to determine the level of supervision differed greatly between teaching hospitals (e. g. assessed endoscopy competence, predefined period of time or number of procedures). Only 26 residents (26 %) reported uniformity in teaching methods and styles between different supervising gastroenterologists in their teaching hospital.

Conclusions Although most gastroenterology residents were satisfied with the endoscopy training program and endoscopy supervision in their teaching hospital, this study identified considerable local and regional variability. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate the trainers’ perspective and trainers’ behavior during endoscopy training sessions, which might eventually lead to the development of best practices regarding endoscopy training, including standardization of training programs and supervision methods.

Publication History

Received: 11 May 2022

Accepted after revision: 30 September 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 September 2022

Article published online:
15 December 2022

• References

• 1 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
• 2 Uitgave van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Maag-Darm-Leverartsen. NOVUM Landelijk Opleidingsplan Voor De Specialistenopleiding Maag-Darm-Leverziekten. 2018 https://www.knmg.nl/web/file?uuid=6b17510e-03c7-4c31-b9af-1587ae868ae9&owner=5c945405-d6ca-4deb-aa16-7af2088aa173&contentid=73016&elementid=2178494 Accessed 2022 Apr 14
• 3 Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-bases training. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1176-1177
• 4 Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 591-597
• 5 Khan R, Plahouras J, Johnston BC. et al. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; CD008237
• 6 Suzuki N, Thomas-Gibson S, Vance M. et al. Efficacy of an accelerated colonoscopy training week: audit from one national colonoscopy training center in the UK. Dig Endosc 2006; 18: 288-293
• 7 Thomas-Gibson S, Bassett P, Suzuki N. et al. Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 818-824
• 8 Götzberger M, Rösch T, Geisenhof S. et al. Effectiveness of a novel endoscopy training concept. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 802-807
• 9 Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC. et al. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6: CD008237
• 10 Koch AD, Ekkelenkamp VE, Haringsma J. et al. Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 630-636
• 11 Mahmood T, Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1224-1230
• 12 Hatala R, Cook DA, Zendejas B. et al. Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014; 19: 251-272
• 13 Mehta T, Dowler K, McKaig B. et al. Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists. Frontline Gastroenterol 2011; 2: 35-42
• 14 Patel SG, Keswani R, Elta G. et al. Status of competency-based medical education in endoscopy training: a nationwide survey of US ACGME-accredited gastroenterology training programs. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 956-962
• 15 Han S, Obuch JC, Duloy AM. et al. Prospective multicenter study evaluating endoscopy competence among gastroenterology trainees in the era of the next accreditation system. Acad Med 2020; 95: 283-292
• 16 Khan R, Zheng E, Wani SB. et al. Colonoscopy competence assessment tools: a systematic review of validity evidence. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1235-1245
• 17 Huang C, Hopkins R, Huang K. et al. Standardizing endoscopy training: a workshop for endoscopy educators. MedEdPORTAL 2020; 16: 11015
• 18 Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2004; 24: 177-181
• 19 Kumar NL, Smith BN, Lee LS. et al. Best practices in teaching endoscopy based on a Delphi survey of gastroenterology program directors and experts in endoscopy education. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 574-579
• 20 Maida M, Alrubaiy L, Bokun T. et al. Current challenges and future needs of clinical and endoscopic training in gastroenterology: a European survey. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E525-E533