White Paper – Verbesserung der Versorgungs- und Behandlungsangebote für Menschen mit Sepsis- und Infektionsfolgen

Zusammenfassung

Hunderttausende Menschen mit Sepsis- und Infektionsfolgen werden derzeit in Deutschland nicht optimal versorgt. Dieses White Paper stellt Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Versorgung vor, die von einer multidisziplinären Expertengruppe im Rahmen des Innovationsfonds-Projektes SEPFROK erarbeitet wurden. Eine optimale Versorgung beruht auf 4 Säulen: 1. der sektorenübergreifenden Erfassung der Folgen und einem strukturierten Entlass- und Überleitungsmanagement, 2. einem gezielten Angebot von interdisziplinärer Rehabilitation- und Nachsorge mit struktureller Unterstützung, 3. der Stärkung der spezifischen Gesundheitskompetenz von Betroffenen und Angehörigen und 4. der Intensivierung der Forschung zu Ursachen, Prävention und Therapie der Folgen. Hierfür müssen entsprechende sektorenübergreifende Versorgungsstrukturen und sozialrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen geschaffen werden.

Abstract

Hundreds of thousands of individuals who experience lasting sequelae after sepsis and infections in Germany do not receive optimal care. In this White Paper we present measures for improvement, which were developed by a multidisciplinary expect panel as part of the SEPFROK project. Improved care rests on four pillars: 1. cross-sectoral assessment of sequelae and a structured discharge and transition management, 2. interdisciplinary rehabilitation and aftercare with structural support, 3. strengthening the specific health literacy of patients and families, and 4. increased research into causes, prevention and treatment of sequelae. To achieve this, appropriate cross-sectoral care structures and legal frameworks must be created.

Schlüsselwörter

Sepsis - Infektionsfolgen - Post-Sepsis-Syndrom - Nachsorge - Rehabilitation

Key words

sepsis - infection sequelae - post-sepsis-syndrome - aftercare - rehabilitation

Publication History

Article published online:
14 December 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review. JAMA 2018; 319: 62-75 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687.
• 2 Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM. et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020; 395: 200-211 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
• 3 Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D. et al. Challenges in Assessing the Burden of Sepsis and Understanding the Inequalities of Sepsis Outcomes between National Health Systems – Secular Trends in Sepsis and Infection Incidence and Mortality in Germany. Intensive care medicine 2018; 44: 1826-1835
• 4 Angus DC. The lingering consequences of sepsis: a hidden public health disaster?. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2010; 304: 1833-1834 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1546.
• 5 Mostel Z, Perl A, Marck M. et al. Post-sepsis syndrome – an evolving entity that afflicts survivors of sepsis. Mol Med 2019; 26: 6 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-019-0132-z.
• 6 Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y. et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397: 220-232 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8.
• 7 Karakike E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Kyprianou M. et al. COVID-19 as cause of viral sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Intensive Care Medicine (in revision). 2021
• 8 European Society of Intensive Care M, Global Sepsis A, Society of Critical Care M Reducing the global burden of sepsis: a positive legacy for the COVID-19 pandemic?. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47: 733-736 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06409-y.
• 9 Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A. et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med 2021; 27: 601-615 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z.
• 10 Brunkhorst FW, Pletz M, Gastmeier P. et al. S3-Leitlinie Sepsis – Prävention, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge. 2018
• 11 Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N. et al. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority – AWHO Resolution. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 414-417 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170.
• 12 Schmidt K, Worrack S, Von Korff M. et al. Effect of a Primary Care Management Intervention on Mental Health-Related Quality of Life Among Survivors of Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2016; 315: 2703-2711 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.7207.
• 13 Schofield-Robinson OJ, Lewis SR, Smith AF. et al. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11: CD012701 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012701.pub2.
• 14 Fleischmann-Struzek C, Rose N, Freytag A. et al. Epidemiology and Costs of Postsepsis Morbidity, Nursing Care Dependency, and Mortality in Germany, 2013 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2134290 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34290.
• 15 Winkler DR, Schettler A, Spoden M. et al. Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen Nach Überlebter Sepsis – eine Analyse basierend auf AOK-Daten. Deutscher Kongress Versorgungsforschung. 2020. Berlin:
• 16 Hartog CS, Bodechtel U, Fleischmann-Struzek C. et al. [Sepsis: Sequelae for Affected Patients and The Health Care System]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2020; 145: 252-259 DOI: 10.1055/a-1019-6379.
• 17 Huang CY, Daniels R, Lembo A. et al. Life after sepsis: an international survey of survivors to understand the post-sepsis syndrome. Int J Qual Health Care 2019; 31: 191-198 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy137.
• 18 Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Blackwood B. et al. Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 972-981 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201812-2383CP.
• 19 Gehrke-Beck S, Gensichen J, Turner KM. et al. General practitionersʼ views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study. BMJ open 2021; 11: e040533 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040533.
• 20 Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P. et al. Improving Patient Handovers From Hospital to Primary Care A Systematic Review. Annals of internal medicine 2012; 157: U417-U481 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006.
• 21 Hoffman K, Thomas A, Brett S. Clinical Pathways for the Continuum of Rehabilitation. In: Stevens R, Hart N, Herridge M Hrsg. Textbook of post- ICU medicine: the legacy of critical care. Oxford University Press; 2014: 546-558
• 22 Mikkelsen ME, Still M, Anderson BJ. et al. Society of Critical Care Medicineʼs International Consensus Conference on Prediction and Identification of Long-Term Impairments After Critical Illness. Critical care medicine 2020; 48: 1670-1679 DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004586.
• 23 Needham DM, Sepulveda KA, Dinglas VD. et al. Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 1122-1130 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0372OC.
• 24 Spies CD, Krampe H, Paul N. et al. Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings – Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test. J Intensive Care Soc 2021; 22: 159-174 DOI: 10.1177/1751143720923597.
• 25 Van Der Schaaf M, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Van Der Steen M. et al. Recommendations for intensive care follow-up clinics; report from a survey and conference of Dutch intensive cares. Minerva Anestesiol 2015; 81: 135-144
• 26 Beyer JB, Glaesener JJ, Liebl ME. et al. Position Paper on Interdisciplinary Acute Care Rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2015; 25: 260-280
• 27 Kayambu G, Boots R, Paratz J. Physical therapy for the critically ill in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical care medicine 2013; 41: 1543-1554 DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca637.
• 28 Liebl ME, Elmer N, Schwedtke C. et al. [Interdisciplinary Acute Medical Rehabilitation after Sepsis – A Retrospective Analysis]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2018; 57: 372-380 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117547.
• 29 Rahmel T, Schmitz S, Nowak H. et al. Long-term mortality and outcome in hospital survivors of septic shock, sepsis, and severe infections: The importance of aftercare. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0228952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228952.
• 30 Taylor SP, Chou SH, Sierra MF. et al. Association between Adherence to Recommended Care and Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Sepsis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2020; 17: 89-97 DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201907-514OC.
• 31 Rohr M, Brandstetter S, Bernardi C. et al. Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7: 90 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1.
• 32 Prescott HC, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ. Readmission diagnoses after hospitalization for severe sepsis and other acute medical conditions. JAMA 2015; 313: 1055-1057 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.1410.
• 33 Robert Koch Institut STIKO: Aktualisierung der Influenza-Impfempfehlung für Personen im Alter von≥60 Jahren. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2021; 1 DOI: 10.25646/7655.
• 34 Baker RE, Park SW, Yang W. et al. The impact of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions on the future dynamics of endemic infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2020; 117: 30547-30553 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013182117.
• 35 Warren-Gash C, Blackburn R, Whitaker H. et al. Laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections as triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: a self-controlled case series analysis of national linked datasets from Scotland. Eur Respir J 2018; 51 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01794-2017.
• 36 Rousseau AF, Prescott HC, Brett SJ. et al. Long-term outcomes after critical illness: recent insights. Crit Care 2021; 25: 108 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03535-3.