PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2022; 10(12): E1544-E1547
DOI: 10.1055/a-1964-7458
Original article

Implementation of the Aldrete score reduces recovery time after non-anesthesiologist-administered procedural sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Philip Roelandt
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2   Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Rico Haesaerts
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Ingrid Demedts
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2   Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Raf Bisschops
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2   Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
› InstitutsangabenGefördert durch: Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G072621N
Gefördert durch: Stichting Tegen Kanker 2018-045
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) by trained non-anesthesiologist physicians and/or nurses is often performed during endoscopic procedures. Discharge from the recovery area after monitored observation is frequently based on fixed time parameters or subjective clinical assessment. In this study, the effect of implementation of the Aldrete score on recovery time after procedural sedation was analyzed in a real-life setting.

Patients and methods A prospective observational study of patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia during gastroscopy, colonoscopy or endoscopic ultrasound was performed. All procedures were randomly included to represent a real-life situation with different endoscopists, recovery nurses, endoscopy systems and indications. After a first observation period, all endoscopy nurses were trained to implement the Aldrete score when discharging patients, followed by a second observation period.

Results During the first observation period, the average time spent in the recovery area was 59 ± 22 minutes after procedural sedation. After implementation of the Aldrete score, the recovery time decreased significantly to 47 ± 25 minutes (P < 0.01) with identical doses of procedural sedation and analgesia. The decrease in time was between 19 % and 35 % for the different endoscopic procedures.

Conclusions Implementation of the Aldrete score after procedural sedation and analgesia significantly reduces the time spent in the recovery area. The score can be used to safely implement a discharge policy that provides more efficient and standardized management for an endoscopy service.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Juli 2022

Angenommen nach Revision: 12. Oktober 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Dezember 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Schreiber F. et al. Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline – Updated June 2015. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 1175-1189
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 89-91
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bisschops R, Saunders R, Dooms C. et al. Implementing capnography to help improve patient safety during procedural sedation: quality improvement in a high-volume gastroenterology department. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33: e522-e528
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924-934
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953; 32: 260-267
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Aldrete JA. Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 1998; 13: 148-155
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 DE-Quadros LG, Kaiser-Júnior RL, Felix VN. et al. Colonoscopy: randomized comparative study of insufflation with carbon dioxide versus air. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2017; 30: 177-181
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Marshall SI, Chung F. Discharge criteria and complications after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 508-517
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar