Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1970-6510
Berichtetes und gemessenes Riech- und Schmeckvermögen in einer Long-COVID-Kohorte
Reported and measured olfactory and gustatory findings in a long-COVID cohortdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ec3/b9ec34173a6428cc41bec30c0c28f9b4a4306b57" alt=""
Zusammenfassung
Einleitung Störungen des Riech- und Schmecksinns werden häufig zahlenmäßig übereinstimmend als Long-COVID-Symptom beklagt. Anhand von Befunden einer Spezialsprechstunde (HNO-LCS) soll geklärt werden, wie groß tatsächlich der Anteil pathologischer olfaktorischer bzw. gustatorischer Diagnosen in dieser Kohorte ist.
Methodik 48 erwachsene Patienten, die die HNO-LCS aus eigenem Leidensdruck aufsuchten, wurden nach ihrer Anamnese befragt, sie schätzten ihr Riech- (SER) und Schmeckvermögen (SES) mit Schulnoten ein und absolvierten als Riechtest den erweiterten Sniffin’Sticks-Test und als Schmecktest den 3-Tropfen-Test. Aus dem SDI-Riechscore und dem totalen Schmeckscore (SScore-total) wurden anhand von Normwerten Diagnosen erstellt. Zwischen den gemessenen Scores und der Selbsteinschätzung und zwischen SER und SES wurden Korrelationen berechnet.
Ergebnisse Tatsächliche pathologische chemosensorische Diagnosen bestanden bei 90% der Patienten. Pathologische olfaktorische Diagnosen waren doppelt so häufig wie gustatorische. Bei 10% der Kohorte war keine pathologische Diagnose verifizierbar. Bei 6 Patienten wurde ein Anosmie-Ageusie-Syndrom diagnostiziert. SER korrelierte stark mit SDI. SES korrelierte moderat mit SScore-total. SER korrelierte stark mit SES.
Schlussfolgerungen Bei der Interpretation berichteter chemosensorischer Symptome besteht die Gefahr einer Konfusion von Riechen und Schmecken durch die Betroffenen. Deshalb ist die Überprüfung der chemischen Sinne mit validierten Tests in Long-COVID-Ambulanzen wichtig.
Abstract
Introduction Disorders of the sense of smell and taste are often complained as a long-COVID symptom. In a special long-COVID consultation (ENT-LCS), we wanted to figure out how large the proportion of pathological olfactory or gustatory diagnoses actually is in this cohort.
Methods 48 adult patients who visited the ENT-LCS because of their own suffering were asked about their history, rated their ability to smell (SER) and taste (SES) with school grades and completed the extended Sniffin’ Sticks test and the 3-drop test as a taste test. Diagnoses were made from the SDI smell score and the total taste score using normative values. Correlations were calculated between the measured scores and the self-assessment and between SER and SES.
Results Pathological chemosensory diagnoses were present in 90%. Pathological olfactory diagnoses were twice as common as gustatory ones. No pathological diagnosis could be verified in 10% of the cohort. Anosmia-ageusia syndrome was diagnosed in six patients. SER correlated strongly with SDI. SES correlated moderately with SScore-total. SER correlated strongly with SES.
Conclusions There is a risk of smell-taste confusion when interpreting reported chemosensory symptoms. This is another reason why reference is made to the importance of quantifying the chemical senses with validated tests.
Schlüsselwörter
Long-COVID - berichtetes Riechvermögen - gemessenes Riechvermögen - berichtetes Schmeckvermögen - gemessenes Schmeckvermögen - Konfusion Riechen und SchmeckenKeywords
Long-COVID - reported olfactory function - measured olfactory function - reported gustatory function - measured gustatory function - confusion of smell and tastePublication History
Received: 20 April 2022
Accepted after revision: 26 October 2022
Article published online:
08 December 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Koczulla AR, Ankermann T, Behrends U. et al. S1-Leitlinie Post-COVID/Long-COVID. Pneumologie 2021; 75: 869-900
- 2 Boscolo-Rizzo P, Hummel T, Hopkins C. et al. High prevalence of long-term olfactory, gustatory, and chemesthesis dysfunction in post-COVID-19 patients: a matched case-control study with one-year follow-up using a comprehensive psychophysical evaluation. Rhinology 2021;
- 3 Förster C, Colombo MG, Wetzel AJ. et al. Persisting symptoms after COVID-19-Prevalence and risk factors in a population-based cohort. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2022; 119: 167-174
- 4 Rozin P. “Taste-smell confusions” and the duality of the olfactory sense. Percept Psychophys 1982; 31: 397-401
- 5 Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ. et al. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. Jama 2002; 288: 2307-2312
- 6 Hoffman HJ, Cruickshanks KJ, Davis B. Perspectives on population-based epidemiological studies of olfactory and taste impairment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009; 1170: 514-530
- 7 Welge-Luessen A, Hummel T, Stojan T. et al. What is the correlation between ratings and measures of olfactory function in patients with olfactory loss?. Am J Rhinol 2005; 19: 567-571
- 8 Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H. et al. Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 237-243
- 9 Oleszkiewicz A, Schriever V, Croy I. et al. Updated Sniffin’Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2019; 276: 719-728
- 10 Gudziol H, Kirschstein T, Pletz MW. et al. High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak. Hno 2022; 70: 224-231
- 11 Hummel T. Riechtraining nach COVID-19 beschleunigt die Erholung des ausgefallenen Geruchssinns. Accessed May 11, 2021 at: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/123785/Riechtraining-nach-COVID-19-beschleunigt-die-Erholung
- 12 Cohen J. Statistical Power 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988
- 13 Hannum ME, Ramirez VA, Lipson SJ. et al. Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19-positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chem Senses 2020;
- 14 Hemmerich WA. StatistikGuru: Korrelationen statistisch vergleichen. In. Wiesbaden. 2017
- 15 Gudziol H, Fikentscher R. Verlaufsuntersuchungen an Patienten mit einem posttraumatischen Anosmie-Ageusie-Syndrom. HNO Praxis 1986; 11: 45-50
- 16 Zou L-Q, Hummel T, Otte MS. et al. Association between olfactory function and quality of life in patients with olfactory disorders: a multicenter study in over 760 participants. Rhinology 2021;
- 17 Vaira LA, Gessa C, Deiana G. et al. The effects of persistent olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions on quality of life in Long-COVID-19 patients. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2022; 12
- 18 Gudziol H, Forster G. Medicolegal screening of olfactory function. Laryngo- rhino- otologie 2002; 81: 586-590
- 19 Doty RL, Laing DG. Psychophysical measurement of human olfactory function. Handbook of olfaction and gustation 2015; 3: 227-260
- 20 Landis BN, Hummel T, Hugentobler M. et al. Ratings of overall olfactory function. Chemical senses 2003; 28: 691-694
- 21 Cavazzana A, Larsson M, Münch M. et al. Postinfectious olfactory loss: a retrospective study on 791 patients. The Laryngoscope 2018; 128: 10-15
- 22 Schulz M, Mangiapane S, Scherer M. et al. Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection – characterization of community-treated patients in a case-control study based on nationwide claims data. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2022; 119: 177-178