The Benefit of Transvaginal Elastography in Detecting Deep Endometriosis: A Feasibility Study

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate elastography features of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and to define whether this technique may discriminate lesions from surrounding non-endometriotic tissue.

Methods This was an exploratory observational study on women affected by DIE treated in a third-level academic hospital gynaecology outpatient facility between 2020 and 2021. Strain elastography (SE) was conducted via transvaginal probe. Tissue deformation of DIE and surrounding tissue was expressed as percentage tissue deformation or as subjective colour score (CS; from blue=stiff to red=soft, assigned numerical values from 0 to 3). Ratios of normal tissue/DIE were compared to ratio of normal tissue/stiffer normal tissue area.

Results Evaluations were performed on 46 DIE nodules and surrounding tissue of the uterosacral ligaments (n=21), parametrium (n=7), rectum (n=14), and recto-vaginal septum (n =4). Irrespective of location, DIE strain ratio (3.09, IQR 2.38–4.14 vs. 1.25, IQR 1.11–1.48; p<0.001) and CS ratio (4.62, IQR 3.83–6.94 vs. 1.13, IQR 1.06–1.29; p<0.001) was significantly higher than that of normal tissue. ROC AUC of CS ratio was higher than ROC AUC of strain ratio (99.76%, CI.95 99.26–100% vs. 91.35%, CI.95 85.23–97.47%; p=0.007), and best ROC threshold for CS ratio was 1.82, with a sensitivity of 97.83% (CI.95 93.48–100%) and a specificity of 100% (CI.95 100–100%).

Conclusions Both strain and CS ratios accurately distinguish DIE nodules at various locations. Applications of elastography in improving the diagnosis DIE, in distinguishing different DIE lesions and in monitoring DIE evolution can be envisioned and are worthy of further evaluation.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Ziel dieser Studie war es, die elastografischen Merkmale der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose (TIE) zu untersuchen und festzustellen, ob diese Technik die Läsionen von umgebendem nicht-endometriotischem Gewebe unterscheiden kann.

Methoden Dies war eine explorative Beobachtungsstudie an Frauen mit TIE, die zwischen 2020 und 2021 in einer gynäkologischen Ambulanz eines Universitätskrankenhauses der Tertiärversorgung behandelt wurden. Die Strain-Elastografie (SE) wurde über eine transvaginale Sonde durchgeführt. Die Gewebedeformation der TIE und des umgebenden Gewebes wurde als prozentuale Gewebedeformation oder als subjektive Farbscala (CS; von blau=steif bis rot=weich, mit Zahlenwerten von 0 bis 3) angegeben. Das Verhältnis Normalgewebe/TIE wurde mit dem Verhältnis Normalgewebe/steiferes normales Gewebe verglichen.

Ergebnisse Es wurden 46 TIE-Knoten und das sie umgebende Gewebe von Ligamentum sacrouterinum (n=21), Parametrium (n=7), Rectum (n=14) und Septum rectovaginale (n=4) ausgewertet. Unabhängig von der Lokalisation waren die Strain-Ratio (3,09; IQR 2,38–4,14 vs. 1,25; IQR 1,11–1,48; p < 0,001) und CS-Ratio (4,62; IQR 3,83–6,94 vs. 1,13; IQR 1,06–1,29; p<0,001) der TIE signifikant höher als bei Normalgewebe. Die ROC-AUC der CS-Ratio war höher als die ROC-AUC der Strain-Ratio (99,76%; 95% CI=99,26–100 vs. 91,35; 95% CI=85,23–97,47; p=0,007), und der optimale ROC-Schwellenwert für die CS-Ratio betrug 1,82 bei einer Sensitivität von 97,83% (95%CI=93,48–100) und einer Spezifität von 100% (95% CI=100–100).

Schlussfolgerung Sowohl die Strain- als auch die CS-Ratio ermöglichen eine genaue Differenzierung von TIE-Knoten an verschiedenen Stellen. Der Einsatz der Elastografie zur Verbesserung der TIE-Diagnose, zur Unterscheidung verschiedener TIE-Läsionen und zur Überwachung der TIE-Entwicklung kann in Betracht gezogen werden und sollte weiter untersucht werden.

Keywords

deep endometriosis - color score ratio - strain elastography - strain ratio - endometriotic lesion

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 19. November 2022

Angenommen nach Revision: 06. Februar 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
06. Februar 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. April 2023

• References

• 1 Bulun SE, Yilmaz BD, Sison C. et al. Endometriosis. Endocr Rev 2019; 40: 1048-1079 DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00242.
• 2 Mariuzzi L, Domenis R, Orsaria M. et al. Functional Expression of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor on Mast Cells Populating Human Endometriotic Tissues. Lab Invest 2016; 96: 959-971 DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.74.
• 3 Xholli A, Filip G, Previtera F. et al. Modification of Endometrioma Size during Hormone Therapy Containing Dienogest. Gynecol Endocrinol 2020; 36: 545-549 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1703942.
• 4 Takigawa Y, Mizuno D, Iga N. et al. Catamenial Pneumothorax Due to Heterotopic Endometriosis in the Pericardium. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14: e240335 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240335.
• 5 Hudelist G, Montanari E, Salama M. et al. Comparison between Sonography-based and Surgical Extent of Deep Endometriosis Using the Enzian Classification – A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28: 1643-1649.e1 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.009.
• 6 Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA at al. The #Enzian Classification: A Comprehensive Non-Invasive and Surgical Description System for Endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100: 1165-1175 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14099.
• 7 Mehedintu C, Frincu F, Brinduse LA. et al. Postoperative Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Endometriosis. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 5211 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215211.
• 8 Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M. et al. Optimal Imaging Modality for Detection of Rectosigmoid Deep Endometriosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58: 190-200 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23148.
• 9 Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T. et al. Systematic Approach to Sonographic Evaluation of the Pelvis in Women with Suspected Endometriosis, Including Terms, Definitions and Measurements: A Consensus Opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 318-332 DOI: 10.1002/uog.15955.
• 10 Xholli A, Simoncini G, Vujosevic S. et al. Menstrual Pain and Elasticity of Uterine Cervix. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1110 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051110.
• 11 Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C. et al. The Potential of Combined Shear Wave and Strain Elastography to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in Breast Cancer Diagnostics – An International, Multicentre Trial. Eur J Cancer 2021; 161: 1-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.005.
• 12 Schiffmann ML, Schäfer SD, Schüring AN. et al. Importance of Transvaginal Ultrasound Applying Elastography for Identifying Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis – a Feasibility Study. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 561-565 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366747.
• 13 Xholli A, Kratochwila C, Cagnacci A. Sonographic Appearance of Malignant Deep Endometriosis of the Rectum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.014.
• 14 Dawood MY. Dysmenorrhoea and Prostaglandins: Pharmacological and Therapeutic Considerations. Drugs 1981; 22: 42-56 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198122010-00003.
• 15 Grandi G, Ferrari S, Xholli A. et al. Prevalence of Menstrual Pain in Young Women: What Is Dysmenorrhea?. J Pain Res 2012; 5: 169-174 DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S30602.
• 16 Grandi G, Xholli A, Ferrari S. et al. Intermenstrual Pelvic Pain, Quality of Life and Mood. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013; 75: 97-100 DOI: 10.1159/000343997.
• 17 Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FPG. et al. Terms, Definitions and Measurements to Describe Sonographic Features of Myometrium and Uterine Masses: A Consensus Opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 284-298 DOI: 10.1002/uog.14806.
• 18 Becker CM, Bokor A. Members of the Endometriosis Guideline Core Group. et al. ESHRE Guideline: Endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022: hoac009 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009.
• 19 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 927-935 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.012.
• 20 Feltovich H, Carlson L. New Techniques in Evaluation of the Cervix. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41: 477-484 DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.006.
• 21 Hee L. Overview of the Methods Available for Biomechanical Testing of the Uterine Cervix in Vivo. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 1219-1237 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12483.
• 22 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020
• 23 Deslandes A, Parange N, Childs JT. et al. Current Status of Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Before Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39: 1477-1490 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15246.
• 24 Fruscalzo A, Mazza E, Feltovich H. et al. Cervical Elastography during Pregnancy: A Critical Review of Current Approaches with a Focus on Controversies and Limitations. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2016; 43: 493-504 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-016-0723-z.
• 25 Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J. et al. Differentiating between Malignant and Benign Breast Masses: Factors Limiting Sonoelastographic Strain Ratio. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 131-136 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313168.
• 26 Oturina V, Hammer K, Möllers M. et al. Assessment of Cervical Elastography Strain Pattern and Its Association with Preterm Birth. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 925-932 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0375.
• 27 Ding D, Chen Y, Liu X. et al. Diagnosing Deep Endometriosis Using Transvaginal Elastosonography. Reprod Sci 2020; 27: 1411-1422 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-019-00108-2.