CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(04): E440-E442
DOI: 10.1055/a-2066-8191
Editorial

Endoscope reprocessing: How to perform an adequate air drying?

Ulrike Beilenhoff
1   ESGENA Scientific Secretary, Ulm, Germany
› Institutsangaben

Due to their transmission route, endoscopy-associated infections can be divided into endogenous and exogenous infections.

Endogenous infections are triggered by the spread of the patient's own local flora and mainly include Escheria coli, Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species and enterococci. Endogenous infections cannot completely be avoided due to the nature of endoscopic procedures and vary according to the invasiveness of the procedure.

Since the 1970 s there have been sporadic reports of exogenous infections associated with endoscopic procedures [1]. Since the 2000 s, increased focus has been given on exogenous infections with multi-resistant organisms [2]. In exogenous infections, the endoscope or the endoscopic instruments can be the vehicles for pathogenic or facultative pathogenic germs that originally come from previously examined patients or from the environment.

The decisive factor in triggering an exogenous infection is the germ load within the endoscope channels or on critical endoscope components (e. g. the albarran elevator).

The quality of endoscope reprocessing is an important factor in the development of exogenous infections:

  • If cleaning and disinfection is insufficient, organic residues and germs remain on endoscope surfaces and in endoscope channels. If the endoscope is not dried sufficiently, these germs have enough moisture and good living conditions to multiply and become a danger to the next patient.

  • If the last rinsing water contains germs, the freshly disinfected endoscope can be re-contaminated with this water. If the endoscope is not dried sufficiently, these germs can then multiply and pose a danger to the next patient.

Therefore, inadequate drying is not the sole cause of exogenous infections. It is rather a catalyst that amplifies existing errors and irregularities and turns them into a problem [3].

There are various manual and automated options available for drying and storage of flexible endoscopes. Kwakman et al. investigated a new device which provides an automated drying cycle and storage in a closed system.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. April 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Kovaleva J, Peters FT, van der Mei HC. et al. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26: 231-254
  • 2 Muscarella LF. Risk of transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobactericeae and related “superbugs” during gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 457-474
  • 3 Kovaleva J. Endoscope drying and its pitfalls. J Hosp Infect 2017; 97: 319-328
  • 4 Tian H, Sun J, Guo S. et al. The Effectiveness of Drying on Residual Droplets, Microorganisms, and Biofilms in Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology Research and Practice 2021; 2021: 6615357
  • 5 International Organization for Standardization. DIN EN ISO 15883–4: Washer- disinfectors – Part 4: Requirements and tests for washer-disinfectors employing chemical disinfection for thermolabile endoscopes. 2008 Available at (Accessed 13.03.2023): https://www.iso.org/standard/63696.html
  • 6 Thaker AM, Kim S. et al. Inspection of endoscope instrument channels after reprocessing using a prototype borescope. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 612-619
  • 7 Day LW, Muthusamy VR, Collins J. et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes and accessories. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 11-33 e16
  • 8 Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Snyder AK. et al. Endoscope reprocessing methods: a prospective study on the impact of human factors and automation. Gastroenterol Nurs 2010; 33: 304-311
  • 9 Thaker AM, Muthusamy VR, Sedarat A. et al. Duodenoscope reprocessing practice patterns in U.S. endoscopy centers: a survey study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 316-322
  • 10 EN 16442:2015(MAIN). Controlled environment storage cabinet for processed thermolabile endoscopes. Available at (Accessed 13.03.2023): https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/73067757-7a82-4998-858c-0b0dd1d644a7/en-16442-2015
  • 11 Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R. et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) – Update 2018. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1205-1234
  • 12 BSG Guidance for Decontamination of Equipment for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy (BSGE); 2020 Available at (Accessed 13.03.2023): https://www.bsg.org.uk/clinical-resource/guidance-on-decontamination-of-equipment-for-gastrointestinal-endoscopy/
  • 13 Pineau L, Villard E, Duc DL. et al. Endoscope drying/storage cabinet: interest and efficacy. J Hosp Infect 2008; 68: 59-65
  • 14 Grandval P, Hautefeuille G, Marchetti B. et al. Evaluation of a storage cabinet for heat-sensitive endoscopes in a clinical setting. J Hosp Infect 2013; 84: 71-76
  • 15 Perumpail RB, Marya NB, McGinty BL. et al. Endoscope reprocessing: Comparison of drying effectiveness and microbial levels with an automated drying and storage cabinet with forced filtered air and a standard storage cabinet. Am J Infect Control 2019; 47: 1083-1089
  • 16 Barakat MT, Huang RJ, Banerjee S. Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 124-132
  • 17 Kwakman JA, Vos MC, Bruno MJ. Investigation of the efficacy of an innovative endoscope drying and storage method in a simulated ERCP setting. Endoscopy International Open 2023; 11: 419-425
  • 18 Higa JT, Choe J, Toms D. et al. Optimizing duodenoscope reprocessing: rigorous assessment of a culture and quarantine protocol. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 223-229
  • 19 Pineau L, De Philippe E. Evaluation of endoscope cleanliness after reprocessing: a clinical-use study. Zentralsterilisation – Central Service 2013; 21: 15-27
  • 20 Alfa MJ, Degagne P, Olson N. Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 392-401
  • 21 Borges-Primo AG. et al. Biofilm accumulation in new flexible gastroscope channels in clinical use, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 43: 174-180
  • 22 Barakat MT, Huang RJ, Banerjee S. Simethicone is retained in endoscopes despite reprocessing: impact of its use on working channel fluid retention and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence values (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 115-123
  • 23 Speer T. et al. Minimizing the Risks of Simethicone in Endoscope Reprocessing. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57: 153-158