RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2085-4565
Current state of biliary cannulation techniques during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): International survey study
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopist techniques affect biliary cannulation success and the risk of adverse events during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This survey study aims to understand the current practice of biliary cannulation techniques among endoscopists.
Methods Practicing endoscopists were sent an anonymous 28-question electronic survey on biliary cannulation techniques and intraprocedural pancreatitis prophylactic strategies.
Results The survey was completed by 692 endoscopists (6.2% females). A wire-guided cannulation technique (WGT) was the preferred initial biliary cannulation approach (95%). The preferred secondary approaches were a double-wire (DWT) (65.8%), precut needle-knife technique (NKT) (25.7%), transpancreatic sphincterotomy (5.9%) or other (2.6%). Overall, 18.1% of respondents were not comfortable with NKTs. In the setting of pancreatic duct (PD) access, 81.9% and 97% reported a threshold of three or more wire passes or contrast injections into the PD, respectively, before changing strategy, 34% reported placement of a prophylactic PD stent <50% of the time and 12.1% reported removal of the PD stent at the end of the procedure. Advanced endoscopy fellowship (AEF) training and high volume (>200 ERCPs per year) were associated with comfort with precut NKTs and likelihood of prophylactic PD stent (P<0.001 for both).
Conclusions A WGT technique followed by the DWT and NKT were the preferred biliary cannulation techniques; however, almost one-fifth of respondents were not comfortable with the NKT. There was considerable variability in secondary cannulation approaches, time spent attempting biliary cannulation and prophylactic PD stent placement, factors known to be associated with cannulation success and adverse outcomes.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 14. Februar 2023
Angenommen nach Revision: 19. April 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
03. Mai 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Juni 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Enochsson L, Swahn F, Arnelo U. et al. Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1175-1184.e1–3
- 2 Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P. et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 674-683
- 3 DeBenedet AT, Elmunzer BJ, McCarthy ST. et al. Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1696-1704 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.217. (PMID: 23877349)
- 4 Peng C, Nietert PJ, Cotton PB. et al. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network. BMC Gastroenterol 2013; 13: 147 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-147. (PMID: 24112846)
- 5 El Chafic AH, Shah JN. Advances in biliary access. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22: 62 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00800-3. (PMID: 33277668)
- 6 Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 457-467 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022. (PMID: 19482278)
- 7 Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F. et al. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 625-630 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077461. (PMID: 18680074)
- 8 Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 112-125 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02463-0. (PMID: 15672074)
- 9 Rossos PG, Kortan P, Haber G. Selective common bile duct cannulation can be simplified by the use of a standard papillotome. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 67-69 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70015-2. (PMID: 8454150)
- 10 Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T. et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 362-372 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.012. (PMID: 22248605)
- 11 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. (PMID: 27299638)
- 12 Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. et al. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 605-618 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326640. (PMID: 23807804)
- 13 Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W. et al. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 356-361
- 14 Liao WC, Angsuwatcharakon P, Isayama H. et al. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 295-304 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.037. (PMID: 27720741)
- 15 DeWitt JM, Arain M, Chang KJ. et al. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound: current status and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19: 24-40 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.029. (PMID: 32950747)
- 16 Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR. et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 32-47
- 17 Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 127-149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. (PMID: 31863440)
- 18 Cote GA, Keswani RN, Jackson T. et al. Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency: a national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 65-73 e12
- 19 Lee JM, Moon SH, Park SW. et al. A national survey on the environment and basic techniques of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Korea. Gut Liver 2021; 15: 904-911 DOI: 10.5009/gnl20329. (PMID: 33790058)
- 20 Lopes L, Canena J. ERCP in Portugal: A wide survey on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and papillary cannulation techniques. GE Port J Gastroenterol 2018; 26: 14-23 DOI: 10.1159/000487150. (PMID: 30675500)
- 21 Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL. et al. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1211-1219 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.007. (PMID: 19962504)
- 22 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM. et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2343-2350 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.269. (PMID: 19532133)
- 23 Hawes RH, Devière J. How I cannulate the bile duct. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 75-77 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.008. (PMID: 29157657)
- 24 Pereira-Lima J, Arciniegas Sanmartin ID, Watte G. et al. Biliary cannulation with contrast and guide-wire versus exclusive guide-wire: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pancreatology 2021; 21: 459-465
- 25 Mariani A, Di Leo M, Giardullo N. et al. Early precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary access to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 530-535 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-102250. (PMID: 26990509)
- 26 Sundaralingam P, Masson P, Bourke MJ. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1722-1729.e2
- 27 Kylänpää L, Koskensalo V, Saarela A. et al. Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy versus double guidewire in difficult biliary cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1011-1019 DOI: 10.1055/a-1327-2025. (PMID: 33440441)
- 28 Dumonceau JM, Rigaux J, Kahaleh M. et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a practice survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 934-939.e1–2
- 29 Avila P, Holmes I, Kouanda A. et al. Practice patterns of post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis techniques in the United States: a survey of advanced endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 568-573.e2
- 30 Ashat M, Kandula S, Cote GA. et al. Utilization pattern of prophylactic measures for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a national survey study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.049.
- 31 Smith ZL, Elmunzer BJ, Cooper GS. et al. Real-world practice patterns in the era of rectal indomethacin for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis in a high-risk cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 934-940 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000623. (PMID: 32496740)
- 32 Mutneja HR, Vohra I, Go A. et al. Temporal trends and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 357-366 DOI: 10.1055/a-1220-2242. (PMID: 32668463)
- 33 Buxbaum JL, Freeman M. ASGE Standards Of Practice Committee. et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 163-183.e40 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. (PMID: 30979521)
- 34 Buxbaum J, Leonor P, Tung J. et al. Randomized trial of endoscopist-controlled vs. assistant-controlled wire-guided cannulation of the bile duct. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1841-1847 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.268. (PMID: 27377519)
- 35 Qayed E, Sheth SG, Aihara H. et al. Advanced endoscopy fellowship training in the United States: recent trends in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy advanced endoscopy fellowship match, trainee experience, and post-fellowship employment. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1207-1214.e2
- 36 Yu JX, Berzin TM, Enestvedt B. et al. Gender disparities in advanced endoscopy fellowship. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E338-E342 DOI: 10.1055/a-1311-0899. (PMID: 33655031)
- 37 Gill HK, Niederer RL, Danesh-Meyer HV. Gender differences in surgical case volume among ophthalmology trainees. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 49: 664-671 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13969. (PMID: 34218497)
- 38 Dill-Macky A, Hsu CH, Neumayer LA. et al. The role of implicit bias in surgical resident evaluations. J Surg Educ 2022; 79: 761-768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.003. (PMID: 34973900)