Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(08): E719-E720
DOI: 10.1055/a-2114-3681
Editorial

Retained biopsy specimens: Are they a major issue in endoscopy?

Oscar Cahyadi
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Medizinische Fakultät, Bochum, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN74889)
,
Keith Siau 
2   Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN8028)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Keywords

Other focus (of reviewers) - GI Pathology - Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complications - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Tissue diagnosis


Publication History

Received: 21 May 2023

Accepted: 12 June 2023

Article published online:
01 August 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Refers to:

Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopyEndosc Int Open 2023; 11(07): E653-E659
DOI: 10.1055/a-2098-2470

 

  • References

  • 1 Toy G. Incidence of retained biopsy specimens after esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: 653-659
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ponugoti P, Rastogi A, Kaltenbach T. et al. Disagreement between high confidence endoscopic adenoma prediction and histopathological diagnosis in colonic lesions ≤ 3 mm in size. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 221-226
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Backes Y, Seerden TCJ, van Gestel RSFE. et al. Tumor seeding during colonoscopy as a possible cause for metachronous colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 1222-1232.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ehlken H, Schmitz R, Riethdorf S. et al. Possible tumour cell reimplantation during curative endoscopic therapy of superficial Barrett’s carcinoma. Gut 2022; 71: 277-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ofstead CL, Hopkins KM, Eiland JE. Borescope inspection of endoscope working channels: Why and how?. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E109-E111 DOI: 10.1055/a-1512-2813. (PMID: 35047340)
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hookey LC, Hurlbut DJ, Day AG. et al. One bite or two? A prospective trial comparing colonoscopy biopsy technique in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Can J Gastroenterol 2007; 21: 164-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pappas A, Tan WK, Waldock W. et al. Single-bite versus double-bite technique for mapping biopsies during endoscopic surveillance for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a single-center, randomized trial. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 246-253
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R. et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1205-1234 DOI: 10.1055/a-0759-1629. (PMID: 30458567)
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chu KM, Yuen ST, Wong WM. et al. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 338-342
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar