Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2157-3941
A novel concept of passive loop-forming wire-guided biliary cannulation using an ultra-deep angled tip guidewire (with video)
Abstract
Background and study aims Wire-guided biliary cannulation (WGBC) is a standard technique during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related interventions. However, no dedicated guidewire is available. We investigated a novel “passive loop-forming WGBC” concept using a 0.035-inch ultra-deep angled tip guidewire.
Patients and methods This single-arm, single-center, retrospective study included consecutive 111 patients who underwent passive loop-forming WGBC as the first biliary intervention between October 2021 and December 2022.
Results WGBCs were completed within 5 minutes and overall were performed at a median papillary negotiation time of 81 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 39–170) and 114 seconds (IQR, 49–303) in 83 (74.8%) and 106 (95.5%) cases, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified age ≥ 80 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–11.31) and unintentional pancreatic guidewire insertion (OR: 17.67, 95% CI: 5.75–54.31) as significant risk factors for failed WGBC within 5 minutes. Among the 106 obtained cannulations, the guidewire leading part formed a small-looped tip and wide-looped body in 83 (78.3%) and 23 (21.7%) cases, respectively. Adverse events included post-procedure pancreatitis (2/111 [1.8%]) and guidewire penetration (3/111 [2.7%]).
Conclusions Passive loop-forming WGBC using an ultra-deep angled tip guidewire is a feasible procedure.
Keywords
Pancreatobiliary (ERCP/PTCD) - ERC topics - Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complicationsPublication History
Received: 08 March 2023
Accepted after revision: 17 August 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
21 August 2023
Article published online:
11 October 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. (PMID: 27299638)
- 2 Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 127-149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. (PMID: 31863440)
- 3 Paulsen FP, Bobka T, Tsokos M. et al. Functional anatomy of the papilla Vateri: biomechanical aspects and impact of difficult endoscopic intubation. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 296-301 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9073-y. (PMID: 11967682)
- 4 Horiguchi S, Kamisawa T. Major duodenal papilla and its normal anatomy. Dig Surg 2010; 27: 90-93 DOI: 10.1159/000288841. (PMID: 20551649)
- 5 Purvis NS, Mirjalili SA, Stringer MD. The mucosal folds at the pancreaticobiliary junction. Surg Radiol Anat 2013; 35: 943-950 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1128-y. (PMID: 23645171)
- 6 Bassan MS, Sundaralingam P, Fanning SB. et al. The impact of wire caliber on ERCP outcomes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 0.025-inch and 0.035-inch guidewires. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1454-1460 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.037. (PMID: 29317269)
- 7 Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, Ishii Y. et al. 0.025-inch vs 0.035-inch guide wires for wire-guided cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 9182-9188
- 8 Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Maetani I. et al. Effectiveness of the J-tip guidewire for selective biliary cannulation compared to conventional guidewires (the JANGLE study). Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2502-2508 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3658-0. (PMID: 25902745)
- 9 Hwang JC, Yoo BM, Yang MJ. et al. A prospective randomized study of loop-tip versus straight-tip guidewire in wire-guided biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 1708-1713 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5851-z. (PMID: 28916891)
- 10 Haraldsson E, Kylänpää L, Grönroos J. et al. Macroscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation: a prospective multicenter study by the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy Study Group for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 957-963 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.014. (PMID: 31326385)
- 11 Chen PH, Tung CF, Peng YC. et al. Duodenal major papilla morphology can affect biliary cannulation and complications during ERCP, an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 310
- 12 Watanabe M, Okuwaki K, Kida M. et al. Transpapillary biliary cannulation is difficult in cases with large oral protrusion of the duodenal papilla. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 2291-2299
- 13 Canena J, Lopes L, Fernandes J. et al. Influence of a novel classification of the papilla of Vater on the outcome of needle-knife fistulotomy for biliary cannulation. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21: 147 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01735-3. (PMID: 33794778)
- 14 Ogura T, Ueno S, Okuda A. et al. Experimental study of loop shape using 0.025-inch ERCP guidewires (with videos). Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E427-E437
- 15 Ogura T, Yamada M, Nishioka N. et al. Gastrointestinal: knuckle guidewire insertion: safe techniques of guidewire insertion into the pancreatobiliary tract using a novel 0.025-inch guidewire. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35: 707
- 16 Boix J, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Añaños F. et al. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006; 16: 208-211 DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00002. (PMID: 16921297)
- 17 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E. et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00363-3. (PMID: 15173796)
- 18 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. (PMID: 20189503)
- 19 Sasahira N, Kawakami H, Isayama H. et al. Early use of double-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: the multicenter randomized controlled EDUCATION trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 421-429 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391228. (PMID: 25590186)
- 20 Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T. et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 362-372 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.012. (PMID: 22248605)
- 21 Takano Y, Nagahama M, Yamamura E. et al. Perforation of the papilla of Vater in wire-guided cannulation. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016: 5825230 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5825230. (PMID: 27446851)
- 22 Masci E, Mangiavillano B, Luigiano C. et al. Comparison between loop-tip guidewire-assisted and conventional endoscopic cannulation in high risk patients. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E464-E470