Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/a-2165-7436
Cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective international cohort study
Authors
Supported by: KWF Kankerbestrijding 13676 TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number (trial ID): NCT04677998, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Prospective
Abstract
Background and study aims In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas is commonly performed to prevent cancer and prevent or defer duodenal surgery. However, based on studies using different resection techniques, adverse events (AEs) of polypectomy in the duodenum can be significant. We hypothesized that cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe technique for duodenal adenomas in FAP and evaluated its outcomes in our centers.
Patients and methods We performed a prospective international cohort study including FAP patients who underwent CSP for one or more superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas of any size between 2020 and 2022. At that time, this technique was common practice in our centers for superficial duodenal adenomas. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraprocedural and post-procedural AEs.
ResultsIn total, 133 CSPs were performed in 39 patients with FAP (1–18 per session). Median adenoma size was 10 mm (interquartile range 8–15 mm), ranging from 5 to 40 mm; 27 adenomas were ≥20 mm (20%). Of the 133 polypectomies, 109 (82%) were performed after submucosal injection. Sixty-one adenomas (46%) were resected en bloc and 72 (54%) piecemeal. Macroscopic radical resection was achieved for 129 polypectomies (97%). Deep mural injury type II occurred in three polyps (2%) with no delayed perforation after prophylactic clipping. There were no clinically significant bleeds, perforations or other post-procedural AEs. Histopathology showed low-grade dysplasia in all 133 adenomas.
Conclusions CSP for (multiple) superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas in FAP seems feasible and safe. Long-term prospective research is needed to evaluate whether protocolized duodenal polypectomies prevent cancer and surgery.
Publication History
Received: 12 June 2023
Accepted after revision: 28 August 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 September 2023
Article published online:
10 November 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bussey HJR. Familial polyposis coli: family studies, histopathology, differential diagnosis and results of treatment. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1975
- 2 Lepistö A, Kiviluoto T, Halttunen J. et al. Surveillance and treatment of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 504-509
- 3 Björk J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L. et al. Periampullary adenomas and adenocarcinomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: cumulative risks and APC gene mutations. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1127-1135
- 4 Bülow S, Christensen IJ, Højen H. et al. Duodenal surveillance improves the prognosis after duodenal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 947-952
- 5 Groves CJ, Saunders BP, Spigelman AD. et al. Duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): results of a 10 year prospective study. Gut 2002; 50: 636-641
- 6 Ghorbanoghli Z, Bastiaansen BA, Langers AM. et al. Extracolonic cancer risk in Dutch patients with APC (adenomatous polyposis coli)-associated polyposis. J Med Genet 2018; 55: 11-14
- 7 Walsh RM, Augustin T, Aleassa EM. et al. Comparison of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the management of duodenal polyposis syndromes. Surgery 2019; 166: 496-502
- 8 Aelvoet AS, Bastiaansen BAJ, Fockens P. et al. Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy for advanced duodenal polyposis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: short and long-term outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24: 1642-1650
- 9 Roos VH, Bastiaansen BA, Kallenberg FGJ. et al. Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 457-466
- 10 Moussata D, Napoleon B, Lepilliez V. et al. Endoscopic treatment of severe duodenal polyposis as an alternative to surgery for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 817-825
- 11 Takeuchi Y, Hamada K, Nakahira H. et al. Efficacy and safety of intensive endoscopic intervention for multiple duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: A prospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 515-523
- 12 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
- 13 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M. et al. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 417-423
- 14 Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Konstantinidis K. et al. A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2011; 13: E345-E348
- 15 Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion 2011; 84: 78-81
- 16 Rex DK, Anderson JC, Pohl H. et al. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 330-338
- 17 Hamada K, Takeuchi Y, Ishikawa H. et al. Safety of cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective exploratory study. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 511-517
- 18 Dang DT, Suresh S, Vance RB. et al. Outcomes of cold snare piecemeal EMR for nonampullary small-bowel adenomas larger than 1 cm: a retrospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1176-1182
- 19 Trivedi M, Klapheke R, Youssef F. et al. Comparison of cold snare and hot snare polypectomy for the resection of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 657-664
- 20 Repici A, Capogreco A, Spadaccini M. et al. Cold versus hot EMR for large duodenal adenomas. Gut 2022; 71: 1763-1765
- 21 Maruoka D, Matsumura T, Kasamatsu S. et al. Cold polypectomy for duodenal adenomas: a prospective clinical trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 776-783
- 22 Wang H, Sidhu M, Gupta S. et al. Cold snare EMR for the removal of large duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 1100-1108
- 23 Vanbiervliet G, Moss A, Arvanitakis M. et al. Endoscopic management of superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 522-534
- 24 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085
- 25 Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D. et al. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut 2017; 66: 1779-1789
- 26 Aelvoet AS, Pellisé M, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Personalized endoscopic surveillance and intervention protocols for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: the European FAP Consortium strategy. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E386-E393
- 27 Choksi N, Elmunzer BJ, Stidham RW RW. et al. Cold snare piecemeal resection of colonic and duodenal polyps ≥1 cm. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E508-E513