Der Staffelstab wird weitergereicht

Nach insgesamt 4 Jahren als Schriftleiter und 24 Jahren als Herausgeber bei Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound (UIM/EJU) ist die Zeit für einen Wechsel gekommen.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Dezember 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Merz E, Evans DH, Dong Y. et al. History of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology from 1971 to 2021 on occasion of the 50 years anniversary of EFSUMB. Med Ultrason 2023; 25 (02) 175-188
• 2 Merz E, Thode C, Hackelöer BJ. et al. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany after 20 Years – Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Examinations during First Trimester Screening. Ultraschall in Med 43 (02) 115-119
• 3 Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61 (01) 127-143
• 4 Merz E, Eiben B, Thode C. et al. The role of ultrasound in first-trimester screening after the introduction of NIPT as a service of public health insurance – a consensus statement of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany. Ultraschall in Med 2023;
• 5 Merz E, Abramovicz J, Baba K. et al. 3D imaging of the fetal face – recommendations from the International 3D Focus Group. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (02) 175-182
• 6 Merz E, Chaoui R. 30-year anniversary of ultrasound: Clinical use of 3D ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology (1989-2019). Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40 (03) 288-291
• 7 Merz E, Pashaj S. Three-dimensional/Four-dimensional Ultrasound: The Key for the Precise Assessment of Fetal Malformations. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023;
• 8 Benoit B. The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the screening of the fetal skeleton. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19 (07) 403-409
• 9 Pashaj S, Merz E. 3-Dimensional Ultrasound: How can the Fetal Corpus Callosum Be Demonstrated Correctly?. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (03) 278-284
• 10 Merz E, Pashaj S, Wellek S. Normal Fetal Growth Profile at 10-41 Weeks of Gestation – An Update Based on 10225 Normal Singleton Pregnancies and Measurement of the Fetal Parameters Using 3D Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 179-187
• 11 Kurjak A, Spalldi Barišić L, Stanojević M. et al. Multi-center results on the clinical use of KANET. J Perinat Med 2019; 47 (09) 897-909
• 12 Chaoui R, Heling KS. Grundlagen der 3D- und 4D-Echokardiographie beim Fetus unter Nutzung der Spatio-Temporal-Image-Correlation(STIC)-Software [Basics of 3D and 4D fetal echocardiography using spatial and temporal image correlation (STIC) software]. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27 (04) 340-346
• 13 Grab D, Merz E, Eichhorn KH. et al. Basic Gynecologic Ultrasound Examination (Level I): DEGUM, ÖGUM, and SGUM Recommendations. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 151-161
• 14 Hoopmann M, Tutschek B, Merz E. et al. Quality Requirements for gynecological ultrasound examinations of DEGUM level II – Recommendations of the Sections/Working Groups Gynecology and Obstetrics of DEGUM, ÖGUM and SGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2022; 43 (02) 146-158
• 15 Alcázar JL, Jurado M. Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessing women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120 (03) 340-346
• 16 Imboden S, Müller M, Raio L. et al. Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35 (05) 440-444
• 17 Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 (01) 110-115
• 18 Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23 (06) 615-625
• 19 Albrich S, Laterza RM, Merinsky A. et al. Die Messung des infrapubischen Winkels in der 3-D-Perineal-Sonografie und seine Beziehung zu geburtshilflichen Parametern [Measurement of the infrapubic angle using 3D perineal ultrasound and its relationship to obstetrical parameters]. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (07) E95-E100
• 20 Zhong C, Hu P, Ran S. et al. Association Between Urinary Stress Incontinence and Levator Avulsion Detected by 3D Transperineal Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (01) e39-e46
• 21 Weismann C, Hergan K. Aktueller Stand der 3D-/4D-Volumensonografie der Mamma [Current status of 3D/4D volume ultrasound of the breast]. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28 (03) 273-282
• 22 Vogel-Minea CM, Bader W, Blohmer JU. et al. Best Practice Guideline – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: 520-536
• 23 Cantisani V, David E, Barr RG. et al. US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 533-540
• 24 Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C. et al. The Potential of Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An International, Diagnostic, Multicenter Trial. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44 (02) 162-168
• 25 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How Safe Is the Use of Ultrasound in Prenatal Medicine? Facts and Contradictions. Part 1 – Ultrasound-Induced Bioeffects. Ultraschall in Med 2020; 41 (05) 476-498
• 26 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How safe is it to use ultrasound in prenatal medicine? Facts and contradictions – Part 2 – Laboratory experiments regarding non-thermal effects and epidemiological studies. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (05) 460-502
• 27 Dufke A, Hoopmann M, Waldmüller S. et al. A single center experience of prenatal parent-fetus trio exome sequencing for pregnancies with congenital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42 (07) 901-910
• 28 Miceikaite I, Fagerberg C, Brasch-Andersen C. et al. Comprehensive prenatal diagnostics: Exome versus genome sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43 (09) 1132-1141