Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(12): E1130-E1137
DOI: 10.1055/a-2198-1013
Original article

A stag beetle knife can achieve stabler and safer endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus

Kohei Funasaka 
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Noriyuki Horiguchi
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Hyuga Yamada
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Keishi Koyama
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Tomomitsu Tahara 
2   Internal Medicine 3, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12880)
,
Mitsuo Nagasaka
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Yoshihito Nakagawa
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Eizaburo Ohno
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Teiiji Kuzuya
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Ryoji Miyahara
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Tomoyuki Shibata
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
,
Yoshiki Hirooka
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12695)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has a higher complication rate than gastric ESD. Scissor-type devices, including the stag beetle (SB) knife, are reportedly safer and have shorter procedure times than tip devices. To clarify the characteristics of the SB knife, we compared the treatment outcomes of esophageal ESD with a tip-type knife to those with an SB knife combination.

Patients and methods Between January 2016 and March 2023, clinical data from 197 lesions in 178 patients who underwent esophageal ESD were analyzed retrospectively. Every lesion was assigned to either the tip-type group or the SB group based on the devices with which the submucosa was initially dissected. We compared procedure time and complications and analyzed the risk of muscular exposure using multivariate analysis.

Results Procedure time was not significantly different between the tip-type and SB groups (60.3±42.2 min vs. 58.8±29.1 min). The variation in procedure time was significant according to F test P=0.002). Incidence of muscular exposure was significantly lower in the SB group than in the tip-type group (24.5% vs. 11.1%, P=0.016). These differences were significant in resected specimens larger than 21 mm. Procedure time over 60 minutes (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–5.42, P=0.02) was a risk factor for muscular exposure, and submucosal dissection with an SB knife was a safety factor (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.18–0.89, P=0.02).

Conclusions Performing esophageal ESD with an SB knife is a safe procedure with less variation in procedure time and less muscule exposure.

Keywords

Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complications

Supporting information



Publication History

Received: 27 July 2023

Accepted after revision: 19 October 2023

Article published online:
12 December 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Goto O. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 2009; 21: 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 2020; 32: 452-493
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: S67-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1066-1072
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 255-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 361-389
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hatta W, Koike T, Abe H. et al. Recent approach for preventing complications in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection. DEN Open 2022; 2: e60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Maeda Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N. et al. Mediastinal emphysema after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Its prevalence and clinical significance. Digest Endosc 2011; 23: 221-226
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Odagiri H, Yasunaga H, Matsui H. et al. Hospital volume and adverse events following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 321-326
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O. et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 775-783
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Abu-Daff S, Shamji F, Ivanovic J. et al. Esophagectomy in esophageal perforations: an analysis. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29: 34-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Oyama T, Kikuchi Y. Aggressive endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper GI tract - Hook knife EMR method. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2002; 11: 291-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Akahoshi K, Akahane H, Motomura Y. et al. A new approach: endoscopic submucosal dissection using the Clutch Cutter for early stage digestive tract tumors. Digestion 2012; 85: 80-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fujinami H, Hosokawa A, Ogawa K. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms using the stag beetle knife. Dis Esophagus 2014; 27: 50-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kuwai T, Yamaguchi T, Imagawa H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal neoplasms using the stag beetle knife. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 1632-1640
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Homma K, Otaki Y, Sugawara M. et al. Efficacy of novel SB knife Jr examined in a multicenter study on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society 2012; 24: 117-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Akahoshi K, Honda K, Akahane H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a grasping-type scissors forceps: a preliminary clinical study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 1128-1133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Oka S, Tanaka S, Takata S. et al. Usefulness and safety of SB knife jr in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Digest Endosc 2012; 24: 90-95
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kuwai T, Yamaguchi T, Imagawa H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms with a monopolar scissor-type knife: short- to long-term outcomes. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 913-918
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Oyama T. et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Carcinoma of the Esophagus April 2012 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 2015; 12: 1-30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T. et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus 2019; 16: 25-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Akahoshi K, Akahane H, Murata A. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel grasping type scissors forceps. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1103-1105
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Esaki M, Yoshida M, Takizawa K. et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection with the needle-type knife and insulated-tip knife for superficial esophageal neoplasms. Dis Esophagus 2022; 36: doac067
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar