Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2204-5814
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation versus surgical resection of insulinomas
EUS-gesteuerte Alkoholablation versus chirurgische Resektion von Insulinomen Supported by: Cluster of Excellence, Controlling Microbes to Fight Infection (CMFI), University Tübingen, Germany 2124Abstract
Purpose Insulinoma is a rare tumor of the pancreas that can lead to hypoglycemia. To date, the standard therapy is surgical resection. After the first case report of successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) ethanol injection 16 years ago, the need for establishing an alternative treatment method remains unchanged given the high morbidity rates of surgery and its unsuitability in some patients.
Materials and Methods Here, we provide retrospective data from 33 insulinoma patients that were treated at our center between 2010 and 2021. Of these, 9 patients were treated with EUS-guided ethanol injection and 24 underwent pancreatic surgery.
Results The ethanol group was older (ethanol: mean ± SE 67.8±11.2 years vs. surgery: 52.3±15.7, p=0.014) with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.0 (1.0;4.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0;2.0), p=0.008). The lowest glucose values were similar between groups before (ethanol: 2.09±0.17 mmol/l vs. surgery: 1.81±0.08, p=0.158) and after (4.95±0.74 vs. 5.41±0.28, p=0.581) the respective treatments. Complications occurred more frequently in the surgery group (11 % vs. 54 %, p=0.026). One patient after prior partial pancreatectomy died postoperatively. The hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the ethanol group (4.78±0.78 days vs. 19.88±4.07, p<0.001).
Conclusion EUS-guided ethanol injection can be similarly effective for the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia compared with pancreatic surgery but seems to be associated with less severe complications. This implies the need for prospective randomized trials in insulinoma patients with a low risk for malignancy.
Zusammenfassung
Ziel Insulinome sind seltene Tumore des Pankreas, die zu Hypoglykämien führen können. Die chirurgische Resektion ist die aktuelle Standardtherapie. Nach der ersten Fallbeschreibung einer erfolgreichen EUS-gesteuerten Alkoholinjektion vor 16 Jahren besteht unverändert der Bedarf einer Behandlungsalternative – angesichts der hohen operativen Morbidität und der fehlenden Anwendbarkeit bei einigen Patienten.
Material und Methode Wir zeigen die retrospektiven Daten von 33 Insulinom-Patienten, die in unserem Zentrum zwischen 2010 und 2021 behandelt wurden. Von diesen wurden 9 Patienten durch eine EUS-geführte Alkohol-Injektion und 24 durch eine Pankreas-Chirurgie behandelt.
Ergebnisse Die Alkohol-Therapie-Gruppe war älter (Alkohol: median ± SE 67,8 ± 11,2 Jahre vs. Chirurgie: 52,3 ± 15,7, p=0,014) mit einem höheren Charlson-Comorbidity-Index (3,0 [1,0; 4,0] vs. 1,0 [0,0; 2,0], p=0,008). Die niedrigsten Blutzucker waren in beiden Gruppen gleich vor den jeweiligen Behandlungen (Alkohol: 2,09 ± 0,17mmol/l vs. Chirurgie: 1,81 ± 0,08, p=0,158) und danach (4,95 ± 0,74 vs. 5,41 ± 0,28, p=0,581). Komplikationen traten häufiger in der Chirurgie-Gruppe auf (11% vs. 54%, p=0,026). Ein Patient starb nach partieller Pankreatektomie postoperativ. Die Krankenhaus-Verweildauer war signifikant kürzer in der Alkohol-Gruppe (4,78 ± 0,78 Tage vs. 19,88 ± 4,07, p<0,001).
Schlussfolgerungen Die EUS-gesteuerte Alkoholinjektion kann genauso effektiv sein wie die chirurgische Behandlung der hyperinsulinämen Hypoglykämie, scheint aber mit weniger schweren Komplikationen assoziiert zu sein. Hieraus ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit für randomisierte Studien bei Insulinom-Patienten mit niedrigem Malignitäts-Risiko.
Keywords
insulinoma - neuroendocrine tumor - interventional endoscopic ultrasound - pancreatic surgery - alcoholPublication History
Received: 31 January 2023
Accepted after revision: 06 November 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
06 November 2023
Article published online:
05 January 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Service FJ, McMahon MM, O’Brien PC. et al. Functioning insulinoma--incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival of patients: a 60-year study. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 711-719 DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62083-7. (PMID: 1677058)
- 2 Stojadinovic A, Brooks A, Hoos A. et al. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Col Surg 2003; 196: 954-964 DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00010-3. (PMID: 12788434)
- 3 Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM. et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1310-1314 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1310. (PMID: 14662530)
- 4 Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 983-994 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70195-1. (PMID: 9287993)
- 5 Herrera-Cabezón FJ, Sánchez-Acedo P, Zazpe-Ripa C. et al. Quality standards in 480 pancreatic resections: a prospective observational study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2015; 107: 143-151 (PMID: 25733038)
- 6 Jilesen APJ, van Eijck CH, Busch OR. et al. Postoperative Outcomes of Enucleation and Standard Resections in Patients with a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor. World J Surg 2016; 40: 715-728 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3341-9. (PMID: 26608956)
- 7 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187-196 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. (PMID: 19638912)
- 8 Cauley CE, Pitt HA, Ziegler KM. et al. Pancreatic enucleation: improved outcomes compared to resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1347-1353 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1893-7. (PMID: 22528577)
- 9 van Beek DJ, Nell S, Verkooijen HM. et al. Surgery for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related insulinoma: long-term outcomes in a large international cohort. Br J Surg 2020; 107: 1489-1499
- 10 Jürgensen C, Schuppan D, Neser F. et al. EUS-guided alcohol ablation of an insulinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 1059-1062 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.10.034. (PMID: 16733126)
- 11 Armellini E, Crinò SF, Ballarè M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: A case study and literature review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 192-197 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.192. (PMID: 26862370)
- 12 Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G. et al. Consensus guidelines update for the management of functional p-NETs (F-p-NETs) and non-functional p-NETs (NF-p-NETs). Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 153-171
- 13 Uzunoglu FG, Reeh M, Vettorazzi E. et al. Preoperative Pancreatic Resection (PREPARE) score: a prospective multicenter-based morbidity risk score. Ann Surg 2014; 260: 857-863 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000946. (PMID: 25243549)
- 14 American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anaesthesiology 1963; 24: 111
- 15 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 95: 1078-1085 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.038. (PMID: 34890695)
- 16 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
- 17 So H, Ko SW, Shin SH. et al. Comparison of EUS-guided ablation and surgical resection for nonfunctioning small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity score-matching study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 741-751 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.004. (PMID: 36400239)
- 18 Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Rimbaş M. et al. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation as an alternative to surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Who should we treat?. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 220-226
- 19 España-Gómez MN, Velázquez-Fernández D, Bezaury P. et al. Pancreatic insulinoma: a surgical experience. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1966-1970 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0145-9. (PMID: 19629581)
- 20 Crinò SC, Napoleon B, Facciorusso A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for treatment of pancreatic insulinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 2834-2843.e2 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.02.022.
- 21 Wei J, Liu X, Wu J. et al. Diagnosis and surgical management of insulinomas in 33 consecutive patients at a single institution. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009; 401: 1019-1025 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1496-y. (PMID: 27539217)
- 22 Xu Q, Xie Q, Ge C. et al. Risk factors and prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after insulinoma enucleation: a retrospective study from a high-volume center. Pancreatology 2021; 21: 1208-1215
- 23 Krautz C, Nimptsch U, Weber GF. et al. Effect of Hospital Volume on In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 411-417 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002248. (PMID: 28379871)
- 24 Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY. et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1727 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y. (PMID: 22760965)
- 25 El Sayed G, Frim L, Franklin J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol and radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic insulinomas: a systematic literature review. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211042171. (PMID: 34819995)
- 26 Armellini E, Facciorusso A, Crinò SF. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59: 359 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020359. (PMID: 36837560)